Abstract
Earlier, I have distinguished between the ordinary and the technical use of the expression ‘reason for action’. A clear case of the latter is the use of that notion in the analysis of other concepts — for instance, that of a legal norm, or that of the acceptance or justification of a decision. The technical use presupposes a precise meaning of ‘reason for action’ since otherwise statements containing the expression cannot fulfil the cognitive function assigned to them.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Redondo, C. (1999). Reasons for Action — Second Part. In: Reasons for Action and the Law. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9141-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9141-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5301-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9141-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive