Abstract
What is the right price for transportation services? Economic theory suggests that prices are correctly set and resources are efficiently allocated when prices reflect social marginal costs. If market prices are distorted, from a social point of view, ‘Pigouvian’ taxes and subsidies could be introduced to bring prices in line with social marginal costs. In principle, the determination of such an optimal tax structure would imply the identification of all positive and negative externalities, and the valuation of all of them. In practice, things are more complicated. For urban transportation services, for example, difficulties may arise because (1) it may not be easy to single out all positive and negative externalities associated with transport activities, especially in the case of negative environmental externalities, because the impact on the environment of some pollutants may be uncertain; (2) the valuation of externalities may be subjective, because of the need to attach values to things like human health and life. Alternative methods can then be used to assess the monetary value of externalities, but there is not a single best method available for all circumstances; (3) marginal costs may not be constant. If marginal costs depend on activity levels, demand-supply interactions in the markets should be taken into account. This is made more complicated by the fact that the market for transport services is a very complex one. Transport modes are imperfect substitutes and are sometimes linked by complementarity relationships.
This paper is partly based on some preliminary results obtained by a model developed within the research projects Trenen (Joule II) and Trenen II Stran (Transport) of the European Commission (DG XII). Research assistance from Stefania Pasquon, Laura Valentini, and Silvio Pancheri is gratefully acknowledged. Detailed comments by Kenneth Small and an anonymous referee helped to improve earlier versions of this work. However, the usual disclaimer applies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cobello, F., 1994, Il trasporto pubblico locale nel Vencto (Local public transport in the Veneto region), Economia Pubblica, 3, 123–141.
Conto Nazionale dei Trasporti, published yearly by the Italian Ministry of Transportation.
Amhad, E. and N. Stern, 1984, The theory of reform and Indian indirect taxes, Journal of Public Economics, 25, 259–298.
Christiansen, V. and E.S. Jansen, 1978, Impicit social preferences in the Norwegian system of indirect taxation, Journal of Public Economics, 10, 217–245.
European Commission DG XII, 1995,TRENEN — Final Report, Brussels: Research Project Joule II.
Keller, W.J., 1976, A nested CES-type utility function and its demand and price index functions, European Economic Review, 7, 175–186.
Mayeres, I., S. Ochelen and S. Proost, 1996, The Marginal External Costs of Transport, Public Economics Research Paper N. 51, Leuven: CES, Katholieke University.
Ministem dei Trasporti, 1994, Radiografia delle FS 1992, Roma: DGPOC.
Roson, R., 1995, Fiscal Policies and Externalities for Complex Technologies: the Transport Case, GRETA working paper n.95.04.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roson, R. (1998). Revealed Preferences, Externalities and Optimal Pricing for Urban Transportation. In: Roson, R., Small, K.A. (eds) Environment and Transport in Economic Modelling. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9109-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9109-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4983-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9109-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive