Skip to main content

Can I Anticipate Myself? Self-Affection and Temporality

  • Chapter
Self-Awareness, Temporality, and Alterity

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 34))

Abstract

It is a commonly shared opinion among phenomenologists that temporality is a constitutive part of subjectivity. As living subjects, we are bound to time, but we are able, as Refslecting subjects, to alter or to change this external, objective time into an immanent, lived one.

“Nee tarnen invenitur, nee est possibile quod aliquid sit causa efficiens sui ipsius ; quia sit esset prius se ipso”1—Thoughout my paper I am going to be addressing this: “being prior to oneself.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. “The second way is from the nature of efficient causes: In the world of sensible things we find there is an order of efficient causes. There is no case known (neither it is, indeed, possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself ; for it would be prior to itself, which is impossible” Thomas, Summa Theologica, I. q. 2, a. 3, The Summa Theologica, Edited with an Introduction by Anton C. Pegis (New York: Modern Library College Edition, The Modern Library, 1948).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Let me mention here the article where I give evidence for this interpretation of Husserl’s late analysis of time ; “Temporalité et affection dans les manuscrits tardifs sur la temporalité (1929–1935) de Husserl,” , Alter 2 (1994), 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  3. One idea that might well be able to capture this kind of affection is perhaps Eckhart’s and his concept of Abgeschiedenheit. A renewed (because embodied) version of Husserl’s unbeteiligten Zuschauers could also be fitted in.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Brand, Welt, Ich und Zeit, (Den Haag: M. Nijhoff, 1955), § 13–14 (die Refslexion im Ansatz)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Held, Lebendige Gegenwart (Den Haag: M. Nijhoff, 1966), 94–126 (Selbstvergemeinschaftung). See also K Held, “Phänomenologie der Zeit nach Husserl,” Perspektiven der Phänomenologie, Bd. 7 (1981), 199 ff

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.-P. Sartre, L’être et le néant (Paris: Gallimard, 1943)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sokolowski, The Formation of Husser Vs Concept of Constitution (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Let me Refser here to the concept of “self-alterity” (altérité à soi) I used in a previous work about intersubjectivity in Husserl (Transcendance et incarnation, le statut de l’intersubjectivité comme altérité à soi chez Edmund Husserl, Paris, Vrin, 1995) in order to account for the genetic process of intersubjectivation.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Dreyfus (cf. Being in the World, MIT Press, 1991, Introd., x) suggested translating Befindlichkeit with “affectedness”. See also the most recent translation of Sein und Zeit by Joan Stambaugh (State University of New York Press, 1995). (Th. Kiesel’s choice, “disposedness” or Marcarrie’s, “disposition” seem either awkward or a bit too plain.) I thank F. Varela for giving me access to these different choices of translation.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Barbaras, “Le sens de l’auto-affection chez M. Henry et Merleau-Ponty”, Epokhè 2, (1991), 91–113, especially 98.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Levinas, “Intentionalité et sensation,” in En découvrant Vexistence avec Husserl et Heidegger (Paris: Vrin, 1988), 155–156.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Levinas, Le temps et Vautre (1946–47) (Paris: P.U.F., 1985), Préface (1979), 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.E. Levinas, Autrement qu ‘être ou au delà de V essence’ (den Haag: M. Nijhoff, 1978), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Op. cit., 41.*U.E. Levinas, Autrement qu ‘être ou au delà de V essence’ (den Haag: M. Nijhoff, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Henry, L’essence de la manifestation (1963), (Paris: P.U.F., 1990), 582–583.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Henry, Phénoménologie matérielle (Paris: P.U.F. 1990), first Part.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The ambivalence inherent in the concept of retention has been quite precisely shown by R. Bernet in his articles “La présence du passé (Husserl)” and “La voix de son maître (Husserl et Derrida),” both recently published in La vie du sujet, Recherches sur l’interprétation de Husserl dans la phénoménologie (Paris: P.U.F., 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. This has been very well shown by Y. Yamagata in his article “Une autre lecture de L’essence de la manifestation: immanence, présent vivant, altérité,” Etudes philosophiques 2(1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Henry, C’est moi, la vérité, pour une philosophie du christianisme (Paris: Seuil, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  20. For all this, let me Refser to the second Part (“Temporalité de l’auto-antécédance”) of a forthcoming book called Lucidité du corps. La chair transcendantale comme possibilité de la phénoménologie. With regard to this point about time I am primarily endebted to F. Varela and P. Vermersch. See N. Depraz, F. J. Varela, P. Vermersch, On becoming aware, steps towards a phenomenological pragmatics (MIT Press, forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  21. As far as such a conception of reduction as a praxis is concerned let me Refser to 1) “Das Ethos der Reduktion als leibliche Einstellung,” in Phänomenologische Ethik, ed. B. Waldenfels (München: Fink Verlag, 1997); 2) “The phenomenological reduction as a praxis,” Journal of Consciousness Studies (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.-P. Sartre, L’être et le néant (Paris: Gallimard, 1943), 538–612: “Liberté et facticité: La Situation.”

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heidegger spoke of the being of being as a wonder; just before dying, Husserl told his wife that he had just seen something wonderful.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fink mentions the reduction as a katastrophè; Levinas links the face-to-face relationship with a timeless trauma.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Arendt, Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin (Berlin: Springer, 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  26. As for such a description ofthat full mobility as a constitutive aspect of emotion in its unceasing fluctuation, see my “Délimitation de l’émotion. Approche d’une phénoménologie du cœur,” in Alter 7 (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hua XI, especially the chapter about Erfüllung. In The Embodied Mind (MIT Press, 1989), F. Varela (and al.) uses a very well chosen word to account for this attentively passive receptivity: he calls it “mindfulness.” It was translated into French by “présence attentive.”

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Depraz, N. (1998). Can I Anticipate Myself? Self-Affection and Temporality. In: Zahavi, D. (eds) Self-Awareness, Temporality, and Alterity. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9078-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9078-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5031-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9078-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics