Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leibniz and Chinese Thought

  • Chapter
Book cover Leibniz, Mysticism and Religion

Abstract

Leibniz’s approach to Chinese thought has been the subject of some scholarly interest in recent years. The prevailing interpretation is that his motivation is that of accommodation between Christianity and Chinese thought. In this paper, I wish to present a different view, namely, that his approach is dominated by his enterprise to combat religious scepticism in Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Richard H. Popkin, “The Religious Background of 17th-century Philosophy,” The Third Force in Seventeenth-Century Thought (Leiden: Brill, 1992), pp. 268–284.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blaise Pascal, Pensées, No, 822, in Oeuvres Complètes, edited with notes by Louis Lafuma (New York: Macmillan, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richard H. Popkin, Isaac La Peyrère (1596–1676): His Life, Work and Influence (Leiden: Brill, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin Martini, Historiae sinicae decas prima a gentis origine ad Christum natum (Amsterdam, 1658); Philippe Couplet, Tabula chronologica monarchiae Sinicae (Paris, 1686).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Virgile Pinot, La Chine et la Formation de l’Esprit Philosophique en France (Paris, 1932; Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1971), p. 214. The verdict of today’s scholarship is that Fu Hsi is mythical, and that verifiable history began in China around 1766 B.C.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Don Cameron Allen, The Legend of Noah (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963), p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Popkin, Isaac La Peyrère, p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Isaac Vossius, Dissertatio de vera aetate mundi ... (The Hague, 1659), pp. 44–48. See Pinot’s summary, La Chine, pp. 204–206.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pinot, La Chine, p. 215. Pinot provided a detailed account of the controversy regarding the merit and demerit of the Septuagint version of the Bible in the context of debates on Chinese antiquity. See also Allen, The Legend of Noah, pp. 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  10. George Horn, Arca Noae (Leyden, 1666). For a succinct account of the controversies surrounding Chinese chronology, See Edwin J. Van Kley, “Europe’s ‘Discovery’ of China and the Writing of World History,” American Historical Review 76 (1971): 358–385.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John Webb, The Antiquity of China (London, 1678), 2nd. edition, p. 193. There is no difference in pagination from the first edition of 1669.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Arnold Rowbotham, Missionaries and Mandarins (New York: Russell and Russell, 1966), pp. 319–320, note 10; Pinot, La Chine, p. 98; and Le Comte’s Nouveaux Mémoires sur l’état présent de la Chine (Paris, 1696), I:134–135, and 141.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richard H. Popkin, The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979), p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Popkin, History of Scepticism, p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pinot, La Chine, p. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. W. Leibniz, Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, series 1, Allgemeiner politischer und historischer Briefwechsel, edited by the Leibniz Archive of the Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek, Hannover (1691–92) (Berlin, 1964), 7:617. See the translation in Moral Enlightenment: Leibniz and Wolff on China, eds. Julia Ching and Willard G. Oxtoby (Nettetal: Steyler Verlag, 1992), pp. 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leibniz, “The Confession of Nature Against Atheists,” 1669 in Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters (PPL), ed. Leroy E. Loemker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), 1:169. See Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz, ed. Carl Immanuel Gerhardt (Berlin, 1875–1890; Hildesheim, Georg Olms, 1960), IV.105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pinot, La Chine, pp. 333–335.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Pinot, La Chine, p. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leibniz Selections, ed. Philip P. Wiener (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1951), p. 577. See also Daniel J. Cook, “Leibniz: Biblical Historian and Exegete”, Leibniz’ Auseinandersetzung mit Vorgängern und Zeitgenossen, eds. Ingrid Marchlewitz and Albert Heinekamp (Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 1990), pp. 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  21. New Essays on Human Understanding, translated and edited by Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett (London: Cambridge University Press 1981), IV, 2,14, and lxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Louis Davillé, Leibniz Historien: Essai sur l’activité et la méthode historiques de Leibniz (Paris: Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1986), p. 426.

    Google Scholar 

  23. New Essays, IV, 16, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Pinot, La Chine, p. 335.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See René Etiemble, L’Orient philosophique au XVIIIe Siècle (Paris: Centre de documentation universitaire, 1957–58), p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. W. Meyer, Leibnitz and the Seventeenth-Century Revolution, translated by J. P. Stern (Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes, 1952), pp. 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Adolf Reichwein, China and Europe (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1925), p. 81 and note 12.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid. See also Donald F. Lach, “Leibniz and China,” Journal of the History of Ideas 4 (1945): 436–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Leibniz, Oeuvres de Leibniz, ed. Louis Alexandre Foucher de Careil (Verlag:Georg Olms, 1969), 5: 32–58.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leroy E. Loemker, “A Note on the Origin and Problem of Leibniz’ Discourse of 1686,” Journal of the History of Ideas 8 (1949): 449–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leibniz, The Preface to Leibniz’ Novissima Sinica, trans. Donald F. Lach (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1957), p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leibniz, untitled, in Schriften, ed. Gerhardt VIII: 188. This translation is from Leibniz Selections, ed. Wiener, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Joseph de Acosta, Historia natural y moral de los Indios (1590). This has been translated as The Natural and Moral History of the Indies in Hakluytus Posthumus, or Purchas His Pilgrimes (Glasgow, 1906). See Bk 6, ch. 5, p. 398. See also Matteo Ricci ‘s China diaries, edited by Jesuit Father Nichola Trigault, published as De Christiane Expeditione apud Sinas, suscepta ab Societe Jesu... (1615), and translated by L. J. Gallagher, The China that Was; China as Discovered by the Jesuits at the Close of the Sixteenth Century (Milwaukee, 1952). See pp. 446–447.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Francis Bacon, Of the Advancement of Learning (1605), Bk. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  36. This view had many subscribers. It was the position, for example, of Athanasius Kircher as set forth in Turris Babel (Amsterdam, 1679). Kircher was a professor of oriental languages in the Roman College of the Jesuits. See Paul Cornelius, Languages in Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth-Century Imaginary Voyages (Geneva: Librarie Droz, 1965), pp. 7ff. Leibniz was familiar with Kircher’s writings.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Johannes Goropius Becanus, Origines Antwerpiannae (Antwerp, 1569). See Arnold Williams, The Common Expositor (Chapel Hill: University of Northern Carolina Press, 1948), p. 230. Leibniz thought Becanus’ approach ridiculous. See Leibniz, New Essays, III, 2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  38. This view was held by Athanasius Kircher. Paul Cornelius claims that the French linguist Claude Duret held substantially the same view. See his Languages in Imaginary Voyages, pp. 7–10. Allison P. Coudert mentions that the search for a universal language, or “real” characters which “unambiguously denote the essence of things,” was influenced by Kabbalistic language theory. See her “Forgotten ways of knowing: the Kabbalah, language, and science in the seventeenth century,” in Donald R. Kelley and Richard H. Popkin eds., The Shapes of Knowledge from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991), p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  39. John Webb, Antiquity of China, p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid., p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See Louis Couturat and Leopold Leau, Histoire de la Langue Universelle (Paris: Librarie Hachette, 1903), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  42. René Descartes, Oeuvres, ed. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery (Paris: L. Cerf, 1897–1910), 1:76–82. Translation is from Philosophical Letters, ed. Anthony Kenny (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970), pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., pp. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Leibniz, Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, IV: 27–104.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid., VII: 184–189. Translation is from “Towards a Universal Characteristic,” in Leibniz Selections, ed. P. P. Wiener, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Leibniz, “Disputatio Metaphysica de Principio Individui” (1663) in Schriften, ed. Gerhardt IV: 14–26. See also “Leibniz,” Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, IV: 422–423.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Leibniz, untitled, in Schriften, ed. Gerhardt,VII: 184–5.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Couturat and Leau, Histoire de la Langue Universelle, ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Untitled, in Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, VII: 198–199. Translation is from “On the Universal Science: Characteristic,” in Monadology and Other Philosophical Essays, translated by Paul and Anne Schrecker (New York: Bobbs Merrill, 1965), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Descartes, Oeuvres, I: 76–82. Translation is from Philosophical Letters, ed. Kenny, pp. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  53. See Donald F. Lach, “The Chinese Studies of Andreas Müller,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 60 (1940): 564–575. The list of questions can be found in Leibniz, Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Darmstadt, 1927), Series I, II: 419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Leibniz, New Essays, III, 7, 6; III, 1, 5; III, 9, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Leibniz, New Essays, II, 9, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Olivier Roy, Leibniz et la Chine (Paris: J. Vrin, 1972), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Friedrich Schlegel (1772–1829) discussed this parallel in Vorlesungen zur Philosophie der Geschichte (Vienna, 1829), translated by J. B. Robertson, The Philosophy of History, 2 vols (London, 1835). Subsequent scholars have written on this. The contributions of Gorai Kinzo and to a lesser extent, of Liu Pai-min, Hellmut Wilhelm, and Arthur Waley have been discussed by E. J. Aiton and Eikoh Shimao, “Gbrai Kinzo’s Study of Leibniz and the I Ching Hexagrams,’“ Annals of Science 38 (1981): 71–92. For recent authoritative accounts, see Joseph Needham, Science and Civilisation in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962), 2: 340–345, and David Mungello in Leibniz and Confucianism: The Search for Accord (Honolulu, University Press of Hawaii, 1977). See also Hans J. Zacher, Die Hauptschriften zur Dyadik von G. W. Leibniz (Frankfurt am Main, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Leibniz korrespondiert mit China. Der Briefwechsel mit den Jesuitenmissionaren (1689–1714), ed. Rita Widmaier (Frankfurt: V. Klostermann, 1990), pp. 47–170. David Mungello’s careful analyses of the correspondence are invaluable. See Leibniz and Confucianism and Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origin of Sinology (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bouvet’s diagram featuring the Prior to Heaven order of the hexagrams in his letter to Leibniz on November 4, 1701 is archived, as a part of his correspondence with Leibniz, at the Leibniz Gesellschaft, Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek, Hanover, Germany. It has been either copied or reproduced in several publications. The most accessible in North America is Mungello, Leibniz and Confucianism, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Leibniz mistakenly believed that the Prior to Heaven hexagram order was extremely ancient. It was actually the result of a speculative effort of Shao Yung (1011–1077 A. D.). See Hellmut Wilhelm, “Leibniz and the I-Ching,” Collectanea Commissionis Synodalis in Sinis 16 (1948): 210.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Leibniz korrespondiert, ed. Widmaier, pp. 134–146.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Leibniz to Bouvet, 18 May 1703. See Leibniz korrespondiert, p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Leibniz korrespondiert, pp. 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ibid., p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  65. D. P. Walker, The Ancient Theology; Studies in Christian Platonism from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Century (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1972), p. 224.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Leibniz korrespondiert, pp. 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ibid, p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  68. This paper is published in Mémoires de l’Academie des Sciences de Paris, and included in G. G. Leibnintii: Opera Omnia, ed. Ludovici Dutens (Geneva: Fratnes de Tournes, 1768) 3: 390–394.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Leibniz, Oeuvres de Leibniz, ed. Foucher de Careil, 5:28. See also Madeleine V. David, Le débat sur les écritures et l’hyéroglyphe au XVIIe etXVIIIe siècles (S.E.V.P. E.N., Paris, 1965), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Leibniz to Bouvet, 18 May 1703, see especially Leibniz korrespondiert, ed. Widmaier, p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Leibniz, Discourse on the Natural Theology of the Chinese in Writings on China, trans. Daniel J. Cook and Henry Rosemont, Jr. (Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 1994). I shall refer to this work as Discourse, and follow the numbering of the sections, which is similar to Dutens’ numbering, with minor differences. See p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Bayle, Réponse aux Questions d’un Provincial, ch. 11, in Oeuvres Diverses (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1965), 3: 927.

    Google Scholar 

  73. See Pinot, La Chine, p. 327.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bayle, Réponse aux Questions d’un Provincial, ch. 11, in Oeuvres Diverses, 3:915.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Nicholas Malebranche, Oeuvres complètes de Malebranche, ed. André Robinet (Paris: J. Vrin, 1958–1967), vol. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Nichola Longobardi, Traité sur quelques points de la religion des chinois (Paris, 1701); Antoine de Sainte-Marie, Traité sur quelques points importants de la mission de la Chine (Paris, 1701).

    Google Scholar 

  77. See my paper entitled “The Linking of Spinoza and China by Bayle and Malebranche,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1985): 151–178.

    Google Scholar 

  78. For a description of the two versions of naturalistic providentialism which Bayle attributed to the Chinese, see my Ph. D. dissertation, Variations on the Theme of the Philosopher’s God: Europe and China (University of California, San Diego, 1984), p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  79. See Leibniz, Discourse, p. 31

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ibid., pp. 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ibid., pp. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Leibniz, Ibid., p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ibid., p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ibid., p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Leibniz, Essais de Théodicée, p. 181 in Schriften ed. Gerhardt, VI:223. This quotation is from Theodicy, translated by E. M. Huggard (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1952), p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Quoted from the English translation: “Letter of Mr. Leibniz on a General Principle useful in explaining the Laws of Nature through a consideration of the Divine Wisdom: to serve as a Reply to the Response of the Rev. Father Malebranche,” Leibniz: PPL, ed. Loemker, 1: 352–353.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ibid., p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  89. André Robinet, Malebranche et Leibniz: relationspersonells (Paris: J. Vrin, 1955), p. 490.

    Google Scholar 

  90. For an account of Malebranche’s approach to Chinese thought, see Yuen-Ting Lai, Philosopher’s God: Europe and China, ch. 2–6; and David Mungello, “Malebranche and Chinese Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Ideas 41, 4 (1980): 551 – 578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Bayle, Oeuvres Diverses (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1965) III:113: 344.

    Google Scholar 

  92. See C. B. Kerford, “Strato and Stratonism,” Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, 8: 24.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Bayle, Réponse aux questions d’un Provincial, 111: 341.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ibid., 113:344–345.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ibid., 114:346–347.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Leibniz, Essais de Théodicée, p. 187 in Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, 6: 224. The quotation is from the English translation: Theodicy, ed. Huggard, p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Ibid., p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Ibid., p. 189. In this passage, Leibniz clearly implies that it is not the case that all possible worlds are infused with order and regularity. His claim is that the existent world is orderly, is regular, and is due to the preference in the understanding of God.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Ibid., pp. 171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Leibniz, Discourse, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ibid., 2 and 45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Yuen-Ting Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA

    Allison P. Coudert  & Gordon M. Weiner  & 

  2. University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA

    Richard H. Popkin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lai, YT. (1998). Leibniz and Chinese Thought. In: Coudert, A.P., Popkin, R.H., Weiner, G.M. (eds) Leibniz, Mysticism and Religion. Archives Internationales D’histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 158. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9052-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9052-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5088-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9052-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation