Abstract
We shall explore the different texts of Kant and Husserl on the structure of knowledge. The distinction between acts of knowing and knowledge as such is one of the distinctions with which we are concerned. We shall refer to the texts dealing with these aspects, taking into account the component of sensuality and the sensuous data that are central in this context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
E. Husserl, Erste Philosophie (1923/24), Part I, Kritische Ideengeschichte, ed. R. Boehm (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1956), pp. 228, 357 ff (hereafter cited as “EP“). On the whole issue of A. Gurwitsch, “Der Begriff des Bewusstseins bei Kant und Husserl,” Kant Studien, LV (1964), pp. 410–427. The term “anthropology” is used in this context not in the sense of a theory of the unique features of man or the position of man in the cosmos. It is used as synonymous with “psychology.” Hence the choice is between anthropologism and transcendentalism.
Cf. E. Husserl, “Phenomenology and Anthropology,” trans. Richard G. Schmitt, in Realism and the Background of Phenomenology, ed. M. Chisholm (Glencoe, 1960), pp. 410–427. Kr.d.r.V. B. pp. 38–40; Kemp-Smith’s transl. pp. 68–69.
EP,p. 357 ff.
Ibid., Chap. 1.
Kr.d.r. V. A, p. 328; Kemp-Smith’s transl. p. 319. B p. 408; p. 369.
Ibid., p. 413; transl. p. 372.
Ibid., p. 135; transl. p. 154–155.
Ibid., p. 574; transl. p. 471.
Ibid., p. 409; transl. p. 370.
Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, Ak. Ausgabe Bde V, pp. 7 ff
Kr.d.r.V. B, p. 33; transl. p. 65.
Erste Philosophie, p. 376.
Ibid., p. 358.
Ibid., p. 287.
See H. Scholz, “Das Vermachtnis der Kantischen Lehre von Raum und von Zeit,” Kant Studien, XXIX (1924), p. 21–69.
Erste Philosophie, pp. 225–226.
Ibid., p. 386.
E. Husserl, Die Krisis der europaeischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phanomenologie, ed. W. Biemel (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1954, p. 203; transl. David Carr, Northwestern University Press, Evanston 1970, p. 199.
Erste Philosophie, p. 357.
Ibid., p. 364.
Ibid., p. 148.
Kr. d. r. V. B, p. 148; p. 163.
Ibid., p. 160; transl. p. 170.
Prolegomena zu einer jeden kunfligen Metaphysik, para. 36. One wonders whether there is warrant for Paul Ricoeur’s statement that the Copernican revolution, disengaged from the epistemological hypothesis, “is nothing other than the phenomenological epoche” (Paul Ricoeur, Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology, trans. Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree [Evanston, 1967], p. 180). The question is essentially related to the concept of constitution dealt with later in this book.
Kant’s Metaphysics of Experience (London, 1965), p. 105.
Kr.d.r.V. B, p. 68; p. 88.
Erste Philosophie, p. 36.
Ideen zu einer reinen Phanomenologie und phanomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch, Allgemeine Einfuhrung in die reine Phanomenologie, ed. W. Biemel (The Hague), p. 119.
Ibid., pp. 3 70–371.
A. Roth, Edmund Husserl’s ethische Untersuchungen, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1960, p. 38; cf. EP, p. 229.
Vorlesungen zur Phanomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins, Max Niemeyer, Halle a.d.S., 1929; English trans. by James S. Churchill, The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind., 1964), p. 29.
Ideen, pp. 370–371.
. Ibid., p. 368. 33. Cf. Scholz “Das Vermachtnis der Kantischen Lehre von Raum und von Zeit.“ Kant-Studien 1924, pp. 21 ff. A further analysis of these issues is contained in the present author’s Wege zur Erkennbarkeit der Welt, Verlag Karl Alber, Freiburg Munchen, 1983; and Legislation and Exposition, Hegel-Studien Beiheft 24, Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, Bonn, 1984, pp. 37 ff.
Kr.d.r.V., p. 33; transl. p. 65.
Ibid.
. Ibid., p. 1; p. 41.
Prolegomena, para. 57.
Kr.d.r.V., p. 68; p. 88.
Ibid., p. 3 5 5; p. 300.
Cartesian Meditations, p. 66.
Kr. d. r. V., p. 404; p. 331.
Cartesian Meditations, p. 66.
Ibid., p. 27.
Ibid., p. 26.
Ibid., p. 23 ff.
Ibid., p. 26.
Ibid., p. 37.
Ibid., pp. 104–105.
Ibid., p. 65.
Ibid., p. 52 note.
Kr. d. r. V., B, p. 89.
Ibid., p. 81.
Die Krisis, p. 259; p. 70.
Ibid.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rotenstreich, N. (1998). Sensuality and Ideation. In: Synthesis and Intentional Objectivity. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8992-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8992-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4997-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8992-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive