Skip to main content

A Full-Circle Theorem for Simple Tense Logic

  • Chapter
Advances in Intensional Logic

Part of the book series: Applied Logic Series ((APLS,volume 7))

Abstract

A full-circle theorem 1 for a given logical system ℒ says that certain proof systems S 1, ..., S 4 for ℒ of the four most important types of inference systems (Hilbert-style, natural deduction, tableaux, sequent calculi) are all equivalent in the following sense (cf. Figure 1):

  • Every proof of a wff A from wffs A 1,..., A k in S 1 can be transformed into a proof of A from A 1,..., A k in S 2;

  • every proof of A from A 1,..., A n in S 4 can be transformed into a proof of A from A 1,..., A k in S 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E.M. Barth and E.C.W. Krabbe. From Axiom to Dialogue. De Gruyter, Berlin, 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Belnap. Display logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11:14–25, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Belnap. Linear logic displayed. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 31:14–25, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Blarney and I. Humberstone. A perspective on modal sequent logic. Publ. RIMS Kyoto University, 27:763–782, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Borghuis. Interpreting modal natural deduction in type theory. In M. de Rijke, editor, Diamonds and Defaults, pages 41–66, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.A. Bull and K. Segerberg. Basic modal logic. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. 2, pages 1–88. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Dosen. Sequent-systems for modal logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50:149–168, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Kracht. Power and weakness of the modal display calculus. In H. Wansing, editor, Proof Theory of Modal Logic, pages 95–122. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Masini. 2-Sequent calculus: a proof theory of modalities. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 58:229–246, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Wansing. Sequent calculi for normal propositional logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 4:125–142, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wansing, H. (1997). A Full-Circle Theorem for Simple Tense Logic. In: de Rijke, M. (eds) Advances in Intensional Logic. Applied Logic Series, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8879-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8879-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4897-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8879-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics