Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 176))

  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

The question that motivated this research was the study of the origin of capital. This naturally led to biological and thermodynamic structures and, in turn, to the substancce of thermodynamics itself. Is thermodynamics a field on a par with, say, electrodynamics? With quantum mechanics? Apparently not, since thermodynamics is the result of utilitarian concerns; to be understood it needs the concept of value. Value derives because a biological entity whether by design or evolution must shed information (data) if it is to survive. Thermodynamics is par excellence the field that does this successfully. It is the epitome of the concept of scarcity and with its engines and processors it provides the more lucid examples of capital structures. This justified the lengthy critique of thermodynamics. At the same time these structures have to be assembled. This gave me the opportunity to explore the physical processes of coalescence of matter and of the formation of structures in order to acquire a sense of what is known in order to discuss experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. U. Eco, Lector in Fabula, Bompiani, Milan 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. General Theory,p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W.V. Quine, “Otherwordly,” a book review in The New York Review of Books, 23 Nov. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. bid. form which I paraphrase and use “algorithmical” for Quine’s “technical.”

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a taste of Landau’s style refer to D. ter Haar, Men of Physics: L.D. Landau, Volumes 1 and 2, Pergamon Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  6. La matière travaillée“ CDR,Sartre p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  7. From Sartre’s Méthode; Barnes’ translation, p. 25. An interesting passage which merges Bohr’s theory of measurement (plagiarized? without giving credit) with Marx’s dialectic. He accepts the “truth of microphysics,” a truth one supposes, that can be reached asymptotically with research. This truth, however, being non-dialectical is unalterable with participation. The dialectical derives from the variety of possible outcomes which the truth of microphysics permit. Sartre’s Marxism may not be all that pure as one may argue on reading (Méthode p. 25) that “the physicist’s hypothesis, before it has been confirmed by experimentation, is also an interpretation of experience; it rejects empiricism simply because it is mute. But the constitutive schema of his hypothesis is universalizing, not totalizing. The Marxist approaches the historical process with universalizing and totalizing schemata…” One also suspects that Sartre may have been influenced by Schum-Peter’s early work on the subject of equilibrium.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.A. Wheeler, Frontiers in Time,in Corso 72, School of Physics Enrico Fermi,G. Toraldo di Francia, ed. Amsterdam 1979. This places Wheeler in the category of Dialectics in the philosophical table of Chapter. II, 3. Wheeler recognizes the self-observation of the Universe through the biological instrumentation. For more see Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 1982, Papers from Conference on Computation. Also Wheeler, J.A., “The Computer and the Universe,” pp 557–600 which relates to the theory of measurement discussed in Chapter IV. 6, and J.A. Wheeler, “On recognizing `law without law”’ Am. J. Phys. 51 (5), 1983: 398–404, which has a bearing on our views for the assembly of structures.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Beckett, Pas Moi,Les Editions de Minuit, 1975; this is Beckett’s deeper play.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quoted in Tolstoy (1982: 77). Quite a different view from that adopted by Planck.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Macrakis, M.S. (1997). Summary and Conclusions. In: Scarcity’s Ways: The Origins of Capital. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 176. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8861-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8861-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4919-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8861-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics