Skip to main content

“Descriptive Phenomenology”: Remarks on Husserl’s Approach to the Foundation of Knowledge

  • Chapter
Book cover The Husserlian Foundations of Science

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 30))

  • 160 Accesses

Abstract

I. The phrase “descriptive phenomenology” might seem like a pleonasm, since there is no phenomenology that claims to proceed in any other than a descriptive way. Nevertheless, all phenomenologists emphasize the attribute “descriptive,” and at the beginning of our considerations it may be helpful to focus upon what they mean by it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. See Alfred Kastil, Die Philosophie Franz Brentanos (Bern: A. Francke Verlag, 1951), and

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oskar Kraus, Franz Brentano (München: Beck, 1919). This book includes a contribution by.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edmund Husserl: “Erinnerungen an Franz Brentano,” 153-167, and also a list of Brentano’s publications during his lifetime. English translation, “Reminiscences of Franz Brentano,” in The Philosophy of Brentano, ed. Linda L. McAlister (London: C. Duckworth, 1976), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ernst Mach, Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen (Jena, 1886). Later editions with the title: Die Analyse der Empfindungen und das Verhältnis des Physischen zum Psychischen, 9th ed., Jena 1922. For the relations between Brentano, Mach, and Husserl in a short survey see Elisabeth Ströker, “Die Philosophie Edmund Husserls. Vorbedingungen, Ausarbeitung, Wirkungen,” in: Elisabeth Ströker and Paul Janssen, Phänomenologische Philosophie, (Freiburg/München: Karl Alber Verlag, 1989), 21ff.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edmund Husserl, “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft,” Logos I, 1910–11, 289–341. (Reprinted Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1965 and 1981, and now in Hua XXV, 4-62). English translation.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edmund Husserl “Philosophy as Rigorous Science,” in: Edmund Husserl, Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, trans. Q. Lauer (New York: Harper and Row, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie, Hua IX / PP, where the best analysis of the eidetic procedure is to be found. For an abbreviated version of this analysis see Edmund Husserl, Erfahrung und Urteil, Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik, ed. by Ludwig Landgrebe (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1972), Chapter II; EJ, Chapter II. See also Chapter V in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  8. This is due to the fact that unshakable truth and absolute validity of knowledge would be in need of being given to the phenomenologist in completely adequate evidence. However, Husserl saw already rather early (cf. Ideas I, section 44) that this kind of evidence cannot even be gained for the immanent knowledge of acts, not to speak of the knowledge of transcendent objects. Husserl’s later investigations into the phenomenon of “horizon,” which belongs essentially to anything given, stresses this fact and makes it clear that all knowledge, even in phenomenology itself, is in principle presumptive knowledge. For more detailed information on this topic as well as for some conceptual differentiations of Husserl’s claim to ultimate foundations,. cf. Elisabeth Ströker, Husserls transzendentale Phänomenologie (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann-Verlag, 1987), English translation. Elisabeth Ströker Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. Lee Hardy (Stanford University Press, 1993), 53ff.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The general importance of this difference for Husserl’s philosophy on the whole has clearly be seen and used in fine phenomenological analyses by Robert Sokolowski in several of his works. Cf. especially Husserlian Meditations, Chapter 2 (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974); Presence and Absence (Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ströker, E. (1997). “Descriptive Phenomenology”: Remarks on Husserl’s Approach to the Foundation of Knowledge. In: The Husserlian Foundations of Science. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8824-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8824-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4910-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8824-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics