Advertisement

Toward a Mathematical Modeling of Creativity

  • Donald G. Saari
  • Anneli L. Saari
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 258)

Abstract

“Creativity” is fascinating! We know so much about the topic without having the slightest idea what it is. We even know how to promote creative behavior by encouraging subjects to avoid strict adherence to rules, to explore new explanations or paradigms, to welcome novelty, to transform a problem into a different framework, to generalize through abstraction, to brainstorm, and to explore options before making evaluations. But, other than knowing that these approaches tend to work (sufficiently well so that some are “corporate brainstorming strategies” while others are tried in the classroom), we really don’t know why. The “why” becomes an important issue. Also, all these different approaches emphasize “generality” over details. What explains this commonality?

Keywords

World View Input Node Adaptation Conflict Final Interpretation Necker Cube 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arieti, S., Creativity: The Magic synthesis, Basic Books (New York), 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Boden, M., “What is Creativity?”, in Dimensions of Creativity,(Boden, M.), MIT Press, 1994, PP. 75–118.Google Scholar
  3. Erickson, E., Toys and Reason, Norton (New York), 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Galton, F., English men of science, their nature and nurture, Macmillan (London), 1874.Google Scholar
  5. Hadamard, J., The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, Princeton University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
  6. Kragh, U. and Smith G., Percept-Genetic Analysis, Gleerup ( Lund, Sweden ), 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Smith, G.J.W. and I.M. Carlsson, The Creative Process, International Universities Press, Inc. ( Madison, Connecticut ), 1990.Google Scholar
  8. Littlewood, J., Some Problems in Real and Complex Analysis, Heath ( Lexington, Mass ), 1968.Google Scholar
  9. Poincaré, H., “Mathematical creation”, The creative process, (ed. Chiselm, B. ), University of Calif. Press (Berkeley), 1952.Google Scholar
  10. Saari, D.G., “Cognitive development and the dynamics of adaptation”, Northwestern University preprint, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Szekely, L., Denkverlauf Einsamkeit und Angst, Huber ( Bern, Switzerland ), 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald G. Saari
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anneli L. Saari
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Education and Social PolicyNorthwestern UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsNorthwestern UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations