Skip to main content

The Sequential Dynamics of Cabinet Formation, Stochastic Error, and a Test of Competing Models

  • Chapter
Collective Decision-Making: Social Choice and Political Economy

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 50))

Abstract

Axelrod (1970) introduced the idea of connected coalitions in one dimension. Grofman (1982) provided a straightforward generalization of that idea to the multidimensional case and offered a multistage model of protocoalition formation in an m-dimensional ideological space which gave rise to the prediction of a unique m-connected winning coalition.

This research was supported by NSF Grant SES-85-06376, Decision and Management Sciences, to the first-named author. We are indebted to Dorothy Gormick for bibliographic assistance. We are especially indebted to Amnon Rapoport for making the raw data of his Israeli study available to us. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conference on European Cabinet Coalition Formation, European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy, May 24–29, 1987.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aumann, R. J. and M. Maschler. 1964. “The Bargaining Set for Cooperative Games,” Annals of Mathematical Studies 52: 443–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. 1970. Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics. Chicago: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSwaan, A. 1973. Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation as Applied to Nine European Parliaments after 1918. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S. L. and B. Grofman 1988. “Majority Rule Outcomes and the Structure of Debate in One-Issue-at-a-Time Decision Making,” Public Choice 59: 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. E. and H. Valen. 1971. “Dimensions of Change and Perceived Party Distances in Norwegian Voting,” Scandinavian Political Studies 4: 107–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B. 1982. “A Dynamic Model of Proto-Coalition Formation in Ideological N—Space, ” Behavioral Science 27: 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R., P. Ordeshook, and M. Winer. 1978. “The Competitive Solution for N-person Games with Transferable Utility with an Application to Committee Games,” American Political Science Review 72: 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, P. C. and M. Winer. 1980. “Coalitions and Spatial Policy Outcomes in Parliamentary Systems: Some Experimental Results,” American Journal of Political Science 24: 730–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B. 1981. “Coalition Formation in Simple Games with Dominant Players,” International Journal of Game Theory 10: 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. and E. Weg. 1986. “Dominated, Connected, and Tight Coalitions in the Israeli Knesset,” American Journal of Political Science 30: 577–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. and E. Golan. 1985. “Assessment of Political Power in the Israeli Knessett,” American Political Science Review 79: 673–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusk, J.G. and O. Borre. 1976. “The Changing Party Space in Danish Voter Perceptions, 1971–73,” in Party Identification and Beyond, I. Budge, I. Crewe and D. Fairlie, eds. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. 1976. “The Kernel and Payoffs to European Government Coalitions,” Public Choice 26: 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models,” American Journal of Political Science 23: 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P. and B. Grofman. 1984. “Parliamentary Coalitions: A Tour of Models,” Mathematics Magazine 57: 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer, M. 1979. “Cabinet Coalition Formation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis,” in Applied Game Theory, S. Brams, A. Schotter, and G. Schwodiauer, eds. Vienna: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grofman, B., Straffin, P., Noviello, N. (1996). The Sequential Dynamics of Cabinet Formation, Stochastic Error, and a Test of Competing Models. In: Schofield, N. (eds) Collective Decision-Making: Social Choice and Political Economy. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8767-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8767-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5800-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8767-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics