Abstract
The modern science of color vision dates essentially from the 1850s, when Clerk Maxwell and Hermann von Helmholtz introduced the modern techniques of colorimetry and popularized the first comprehensive and broadly successful theory of color vision -- Thomas Young’s trichromatic theory. Both Helmholtz and Maxwell, however, acknowledged the powerful influence of Hermann Günther Grassmann and his seminal article, „Zur Theorie der Farbenmischung,“ which appeared in Poggendorff’s Annalen der Physik in 1853. That article has powerfully shaped all subsequent study of color, yet it presents many historical problems. It was Grassmann’s first and only real contribution to the field. It contained many assumptions and assertions that were immediately rejected by others. And in it Grassmann himself claimed to do nothing more than rigorously deduce certain universally-known and accepted principles of color-mixing which Newton had already laid down. Understanding the significance of Grassmann’s contribution, therefore, requires placing it within the larger context of thought about color and colorimetry and beginning, not with Grassmann, but with Helmholtz.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Jean-Baptiste Biot, Traité de physique expérimentale et mathématique, 4 vols. ( Paris: Deterville, 1816 ).
Heinrich Wilhelm Dove, Darstellung der Farbenlehre und optische Studien ( Berlin: G. W. F. Müller, 1853 ).
Ernst Gottfried Fischer, Lehrbuch der mechanischen Naturlehre, 2 vols. ( Berlin and Leipzig: Nauck’s Buchhandlung, 1819 ).
James David Forbes, “Hints towards a Classification of Colours”, The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine, 1849, 3rd ser. 34: 161–78.
Hermann G. Grassmann, “Zur Theorie der Farbenmischung”, In Grassmann, 2.1:161–173. (Original: [Poggendorffs] Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 1853, 89:69–84.)
Hermann G. Grassmann, 1894–1911. Hermann Grassmanns gesammelte mathematische und physikalische Werke, ed. Friedrich Engel. 3 vols. in 6. (Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1894–1911).
David Hargreave, Thomas Young’s Theory of Color Vision: Its Roots, Development, and Acceptance by the British Scientific Community. Ph.D. Diss., University of Wisconsin 1973.
Hermann von Helmholtz, “Ueber Herrn D. Brewster’s neue Analyse des Sonnenlichts.” In Helmholtz 1892–95, 2:24–44. (Original: [Poggendorffs] Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 1852, 86: 501–23.) [ 1852a ].
Hermann von Helmholtz, “Ueber die Theorie der zusammengesetzten Farben.” In Helmholtz 1892–95, 2:3–23. (Original: [Poggendorffs] Annalen der Physik und Chemie1852, 87:45–66.) [1852b].
Hermann von Helmholtz, “Veber die Zusammensetzung von Spectralfarben.” In Helmholtz 1892–95, 2:45–70. (Original: [Poggendorffs] Annalen der Physik und Chemie1855 94:1–28.) [1855].
Hermann von Helmholtz,Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen von Hermann von Helmholtz3 vols. (Leipzig: J. A. Barth,1892–95).
Ewald Hering, “Ueber Newton’s Gesetz der Farbenmischung”, Lotos, 1887, 7: 177–268.
Richard L. Kremer, “Innovation through Synthesis. Helmholtz and Color Research”, Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, ed. David Cahan ( Berkeley: University of California Press 1993 ) 205–258.
James Clerk Maxwell, “On the Theory of Colours in Relation to Colour-Blindness”, In Maxwell 1890, 1:119–25. (Original: Transactions of the Royal Scottish Society of Arts, 1856, 4.3:420–28.) [ 1855a ].
James Clerk Maxwell, “Experiments on Colour, as Perceived by the Eye.” In Maxwell 1890, 1:126–54. (Original: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1855, 21:275–98.) [ 1855b ]
James Clerk Maxwell, The Collected Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, ed. W. D. Niven. 2 Vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1890 ). Reprint. New York: Dover, 1965.
James Clerk Maxwell, The Scientific Letters and Papers of James Clerk Maxwell. Vol. 1: 1846–1862, ed. P. M. Harman ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990 ).
Isaac Newton, Opticks, or a Treatise on the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light, 4th ed. (London 1730 ). Reprint. New York: Dover, 1952.
Claude Servais Mathias Pouillet, Elémens de physique expérimentale et de métérologie,2 vols. (Paris 1828/29).
Alan E. Shapiro, “The Evolving Structure of Newton’s Theory of White Light and Color”, Isis 1980, 71: 211–235.
Paul D. Sherman, Colour Vision in the Nineteenth Century: The Young-HelmholtzMaxwell Theory ( Bristol: Adam Hilger, 1981 ).
R. Steven Turner, In the Eye’s Mind. Vision and the Helmholtz-Hering Controversy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, R.S. (1996). The Origins of Colorimetry: What did Helmholtz and Maxwell Learn from Grassmann?. In: Schubring, G. (eds) Hermann Günther Graßmann (1809–1877): Visionary Mathematician, Scientist and Neohumanist Scholar. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 187. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8753-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8753-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4758-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8753-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive