Advertisement

Hierarchical Learning of Boolean Functions

  • Patrick Suppes
  • Shuzo Takahashi
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 257)

Abstract

The learning of Boolean functions has been the focus of a number of papers in computer science in the last few years, many of which have been stimulated by the work of Valiant [3, 4]. We also mention especially the recent long article by Blumer et al [1] on learnability for various classes of concepts including especially Boolean classes. The thrust of most of this theoretical work has essentially been to show under what conditions concepts can be learned in polynomial time or space. It is of course important to show that learning is feasible for as wide a class of concepts as possible. However, it is also important to focus on detailed results of a very finitistic kind, which are characteristic of learning theory as applied to human behavior, and are of intrinsic interest also in machine learning. In this paper we consider conditions under which a hierarchy of Boolean functions can increase in significant ways the rate of learning of a given Boolean function of n variables. In this context we also compare serial and parallel hierarchical learning, with, as might be expected, the most dramatic effects being produced by parallel hierarchical learning. Because in general the results are better for parallel than for serial learning the reader might wonder why we include a systematic study of serial learning. The reason is that even under serial learning conditions hierarchical learning can often lead to dramatic improvement in the rate of learning.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Blumer, A. Ehrenfeucht, D. Haussler and M. K. Warmuth. Learnability and the Vapnik—Chervonenkis dimension. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 36, 929–965, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. L. Rivest and R. Sloan. Learning complicated concepts reliably and usefully. [Extended Abstract]. Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2, 635–640, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. G. Valiant. A theory of the learnable. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 27, 1134–1142, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. G. Valiant. Learning disjunctions of conjunctions. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1, 560–566, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Suppes
  • Shuzo Takahashi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations