Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Franz Brentano (1838–1917)

  • Chapter
The School of Franz Brentano

Part of the book series: Nijhoff International Philosophy Series ((NIPS,volume 52))

Abstract

Franz Brentano was born at Marienberg am Rhein in Germany on 16th January 1838 into a family of Italian origins.1 His father, Christian Brentano, a writer of religious pamphlets, was the brother of the poet Clemens and of Bettina von Arnim. On graduating from high school in 1855, Brentano enrolled at the Faculty of Philosophy of Munich University (for three semesters) and then transferred to Würzburg (one semester) where he also attended courses in theology. He then moved to Berlin to study under Trendelenburg (one semester) and then, finally, to Münster where he was a pupil of Clemens and received training in scholasticism (two semesters).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. L. Albertazzi, “La psicologia empirica di Franz Brentano: un caso filosofico”, in Brentano 1989, 7–65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Albertazzi, Strati,Trento, Reverdito.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Albertazzi, “Brentano and Mauthner’s critique of language”, Brentano Studien 2, 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Albertazzi, “L’infinito per ecceterazione”, introduction to Kaufmann 1989, 7–49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Albertazzi, “Nominalismo e critica della lingua in Franz Brentano”, Idee 13/15, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Albertazzi, “Brentano, Meinong and Husserl on internal time”, Brentano Studien 3, 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Albertazzi, “Franz Brentano e Francesco De Sarlo: la psicologia descrittiva in Italia”, in Feichenfeldt adn Zagari 1992, 92–114.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Albertazzi, “Descriptive psychology in Italy”, Brentano Studien 4, 155–193.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Il presente psichico tra analisi concettuale e laboratorio, Franz Brentano e Renata Calabresi”, in Albertazzi adn Poli 1993, 131–172.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Albertazzi] “Formal qualities”, in Poli 1993d, 63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  11. “Il valore come qualità figurale”, Rivista di psicologia 3, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Albertazzi, “Psicologia descrittiva e psicologia sperimentale: Brentano e Bonaventura sul tempo psichico”, Axiomathes 4, 389–412.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A L. Albertazzi, “Die Theorie der indirekten Modifikation”, Brentano Studien 6, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Albertazzi, “The psychological whole. I. The temporal parts of presentation”, Axiomathes 1, 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Albertazzi adn Poli 1993] L. Albertazzi and R. Poli (eds), Brentano in Italia. Una filosofia rigorosa contro positivismo e attualismo,Milano, Guerini e associati.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.J. Allenton, E. Carney and D. Holdcroft (eds.), Function and context in linguistic analysis,Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. Apelt, Beiträge zur Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie, Leipzig, Duncker adn Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  18. O. Apelt, Die Kategorienlehre des Aristoteles,in Apelt 1891a, 101–216. R. E. Aquila, Intentionality. A study of mental acts,University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aristoteles, Metaphysics,a revised text with introduction and commentary, edited by W. Jäger, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Apelt 1891b] Aristoteles, Categoriae et De interpretation,a revised text with introduction and commentary, edited by L. Minio Paulello, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aristoteles, Physics,a revised text with an introduction and commentary, edited by W.D. Ross, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aristoteles, De anima,a revised text with an introduction and commentary, edited by W.D. Ross, Oxford, Clarendon Press. Aristotele, Le categorie,Milano, Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Bergmann, Logic and reality,Madison/London, University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Bergmann, Untersuchungen zum Problem der Evidenz und der inneren Wahrnehmung,Halle.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Bergmann, “Franz Brentano”, Revue internationale de Philosophie,349–372.

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. Berti, Aristotele, dalla dialettica alla filosofia prima,Padova, Cedam.

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. Berti, Profilo di Aristotele,Roma, Studium.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Besoli and G. Franci, “Zur Riickfiihrbarkeit der kategorischen

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aussagen und Existenzialsätze. Eine Auseinandersetzung Brentano’s mit Leibniz“, in Leibniz, Werk und Wirkung. IV. Internationaler Leibniz Kongress,Hannover, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. Bonitz, Über die Kategorienlehre des Aristoteles,Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Phil.-hist. Klasse, 10. Band, Wien, Holder, 591–645.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Brandi, “Vorwort zu F. Brentanos `Von der Natur der Vorstellung”’, Conceptus 53/54, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  33. F. Brentano, Lectures on metaphysics,MS M 96 a u. b.

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. Brentano, Meine letzten Wünsche für Österreich,Wien, Neue Freie Presse, Wien 5 and December 1894, now Stuttgart, Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. Brentano, Von der Klassifikation der psychischen Phänomene,Leipzig, Duncker adn Humb lot.

    Google Scholar 

  36. F. Brentano, La classificazione dei fenomeni psichici, Lanciano, Carabba (Italian transi. by Mario Puglisi of Brentano 1911 ).

    Google Scholar 

  37. F. Brentano, Die Lehre Jesu und ihre bleibende Bedeutung, edited by A. Kastil, Leipzig, Duncker adn Humblot, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  38. F. Brentano, Religion und Philosophie,aus dem Nachlaß,edited by F. Mayer-Hillebrand, Berne, Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  39. F. Brentano, Die Lehre vom richtigen Urteil,aus dem Nachlaß,edited by F. Mayer-Hillebrand, München/Bern, Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  40. F. Brentano, The true and the evident,London/New York, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  41. F. Brentano, Die Abkehr vom Nichtrealen,aus dem Nachlaß,edited by F. Mayer-Hillebrand, Bern-München, Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. Brentano, Die Psychologie von Aristoteles, insbesondere seine Lehre vom nous poietikos. Nebst einer Beilage über das Wirken des aristotelischen Gottes,Mainz, Kirchheim, 1867, anast. repr. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  43. F. Brentano, Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt 3, Vom sinnlichen und noetischen Bewußtsein, aus dem Nachlaß, edited by F. Mayer-Hillebrand, Hamburg, Meiner; revised text edited by O. Kraus, Leipzig, Dunker adn Humblot, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  44. F. Brentano, Vom Dasein Gottes, aus dem Nachlaß, edited by A. Kastil. Hamburg, Meiner; first edition Leipzig, Dunker adn Humblot 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  45. F. Brentano, Die vier Phasen der Philosophie und ihr augenblicklicher Stand,Cotta, Stuttgart, 1895; new enlarged edition by O. Kraus, Leipzig, Meiner 1926; reprint. by F. Mayer-Hillebrand, Hamburg, Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  46. F. Brentano, Über die Zukunft der Philosophie,Wien, A. Holder, 1893; 2. ed. edited by O. Kraus, Leipzig, Dunker adn Humblot, 1929; edited by P. Weingartner, Hamburg, Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  47. F. Brentano, Vom Ursprung sittlicher Erkenntnis, Hamburg, Meiner; repr. of 2nd ed. edited by O. Kraus, Leipzig, Dunker adn Humblot 1921; 1st edition Leipzig, Duncker adn Humblot 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  48. F. Brentano, Versuch über die Erkenntnis, aus dem Nachlaß second increased edition edited by F. Mayer-Hillebrand, Hamburg, Meiner; 1st edition edited by A. Kastil, Leipzig, Dunker adn Humblot 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  49. F. Brentano, Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt 2, Von der Klassifikation der psychischen Phänomene mit neuen Abhandlugen aus dem Nachlaß 1874/1911, Leipzig, Duncker adn Humblot; Hamburg, Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  50. F. Brentano, Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt,1 Bd., Leipzig, Duncker adn Humblot, 1874, 2. ed. with introduction and commentary, edited by O. Kraus, 1924–25, repr. Hamburg, Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  51. F. Brentano, Wahrheit und Evidenz. Erkenntnistheoretische Abhandlungen und Briefe, aus dem Nachlaß, edited by O. Kraus, Hamburg, Meiner; Leipzig, Dunker adn Humblot 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  52. F. Brentano, Philosophische Untersuchungen zu Raum, Zeit und Kontinuum,aus dem Nachlaß,edited by S. Körner and R. Chisholm, Hamburg, Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  53. F. Brentano, Aristoteles und seine Weltanschauung, edited by R.M. Chisholm, Hamburg, Meiner; 1st edition Leipzig, Quelle adn Meyer, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  54. F. Brentano, Grundlegungen und Aufbau der Ethik,aus dem Nachlaß,edited by F. Mayer-Hillebrand, Berne, Franke, 1952; repr. Hamburg, Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  55. F. Brentano, Untersuchungen zur Sinnespsychologie,Leipzig 1907; new enlarged edition by R.M. Chisholm and R. Fabian, Hamburg, Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  56. F. Brentano, Deskriptive Psychologie,1890–1891, aus dem Nachlaß edited by W. Baumgartner e R.M. Chisholm, Hamburg, Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  57. F. Brentano, Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles,Freiburg i. Breisgau, Herder, 1862; anast. repr. Olms, Hildesheim.

    Google Scholar 

  58. F. Brentano, Kategorienlehre, aus dem Nachlaß, edited by A. Kastil, Hamburg, Meiner; repr. Leipzig, Dunker adn Humblot, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  59. F. Brentano, “Von der Natur der Vorstellung” (1903), Conceptus 53/54, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  60. F. Brentano, La psicologia dal punto di vista empirico, edited by L. Albertazzi, translation of Brentano 1874.

    Google Scholar 

  61. G. Calò, “Concezione tetica e concezione sintetica del giudizio”, La cultura filosofica,337–368.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Chisholm 1967] R. Chisholm, “Intentionality”, Encyclopaedia of Philosophy,edited by P. Edwards, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  63. R. Chisholm, “Brentano als analytischer Metaphysiker”, in Marek 1977, 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  64. R. Chisholm, Brentano and Meinong studies,Amsterdam, Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  65. R. Chisholm, “Brentano’s conception of substance and accident”, in Chisholm 1982a, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  66. . Chisholm, Brentano and intrinsic value,Cambridge, Cambridge U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  67. R. Chisholm and R. Haller (ed.), Die Philosophie Franz Brentanos,Amsterdam, Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  68. R.M. Chisholm et al (eds.), Philosophy of mind — Philosophy of psychology,Vienna, Hölder/Pichler/Tempsky.

    Google Scholar 

  69. F. Coniglione, R. Poli and J. Wolenski (eds.), Polish Scientific Philosophy. The Tradition of the Lvov-Warsaw School,Amsterdam, Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  70. H. Cruz-Hernandez, “La doctrina fenomenologia”, Acta Salamanticensia,Salamanca, Universidad, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  71. I. mbska, “Francois Brentano et la pensèe philosophique en Pologne, Casimir Twardowski et son école”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 5, 126–129.

    Google Scholar 

  72. W. Dilthey, Ideen über eine bescrhreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie,now in Dilthey 1974, 139–240.

    Google Scholar 

  73. W. Dilthey, Gesammelte Schriften 5, Stuttgart, Teubner; Göttingen, Vandenhoek adn Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  74. C. von Ehrenfels, “Über Gestaltqualitäten”, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14, 249–292.

    Google Scholar 

  75. K. Feichenfeldt and L. Zagari (eds.), Die Brentanos. Eine Europäische Familie,Tübingen, Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  76. H. Feigl and M. Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  77. J.N. Findlay, Meinong’s theory of objects and values,2nd ed., Oxford, Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  78. E. Garin, “Nota su Francesco Brentano”, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana 2

    Google Scholar 

  79. R. Giannetti, “La presenza di Franz Brentano in Italia agli inizi del novecento”, Rivista di Filosofia neoscolastica 69, 86–102.

    Google Scholar 

  80. L. Gilson, Méthode et métaphysique selon Franz Brentano,Paris, Vrin. R. Grossmann, The structure of mind,Milwankee, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  81. R. Haller, “Ludwig Wittgenstein und die österreichische Philosophie”, Wissenschaft und Weltbild,2.

    Google Scholar 

  82. R. Haller, “Brentanos Sprachkritik, oder daß `man unterscheiden muß was es (hier) zu unterscheiden gibt”’, in Chisholm adn Haller 1978, 211–224

    Google Scholar 

  83. K. Hedwig, “Deskription. Die historischen Voraussetzungen und die Rezeption Brentanos”, Brentano Studien 1

    Google Scholar 

  84. M. Heidegger, Die Lehre vom Urteil im Psychologismus,Leipzig, Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  85. F. Hillebrand, Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüge,Wien. A. Höfler, Logik,Wien, Tempsky.

    Google Scholar 

  86. E. Husser, “Erinnerung an Franz Brentano”, in Kraus 1919, 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  87. E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen,Halle, Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  88. E. Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Husserliana III-V.

    Google Scholar 

  89. E. Husserl, “Vorlesungen zur Phänomelogie des inneren Zeit- bewußtseins”, in Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 9, 367–496.

    Google Scholar 

  90. E. Husserl, “Intentionale Gegenstände” (1894), in Husserliana XXII, The Hague, Martin Nijhoff, 303–348.

    Google Scholar 

  91. A. Kastil, Die Philosophie Franz Brentanos. Eine Einführung in seine Lehre,Bern, A. Francke Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  92. G. Katkov, “Bewußtsein, Gegenstand, Sachverhalt. Eine Brentano- Studie”, Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 75, no. 3–4, 462–544. Kaufmann 1989 F. Kaufmann, L ‘infinito in matematica,Trento, Reverdito.

    Google Scholar 

  93. G. Kirchhoff, Vorlesungen über mathematische Physik,2 vol., Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  94. S. Körner, “Über Brentanos Reismus und die extensionale Logik”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 5, 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  95. . Körner, “On the logic of relations”, in Allenton Carney adn Holdcroft 1979, 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  96. T. Kotarbinski, “Franz Brentano comme réiste”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 20, 459–476.

    Google Scholar 

  97. T. Kotarbinski, Gnosiology. The scientific approach to the theory of knowledge (1929), Oxford/Wroclaw, Pergamon Press/Ossolineum.

    Google Scholar 

  98. O. Kraus, Franz Brentano. Zur Kenntnis seines Lebens und seiner Lehre, mit Beiträgen von Carl Stumpf und Edmund Husserl, München, Beck. Kraus 1925

    Google Scholar 

  99. Offene Briefe an Albert Einstein und Max von Laue über die gedanklichen Grundlagen der speziellen und allgemeinen Relativitäts theorie,Wien/Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  100. O. Kraus, “Zur Phänomenognosie des Zeitbewußtseins”, Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie,1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  101. O. Kraus, “Die Mißdeutungen der Relativitätstheorie”, in Naturwissen-schaft und Metaphysik,Brünn/Leipzig, 33–77.

    Google Scholar 

  102. N. Kretzmann (ed.), Ancient and medieval thought,Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  103. b N. Kretzmann, Infinity and continuity, in Kretzmann 1982a.

    Google Scholar 

  104. N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny and J. Pingborg (eds), The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy,Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  105. G. Küng, “Der Intentionale und der Reale Gegenstand”, in Chisholm et al. 1985, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  106. L. Landgrebe, Der Weg der Phänomenologie,Gütersloh.

    Google Scholar 

  107. G.W. Leibniz, “Generales inquisitiones de analysi notionum et veritatum”, in Leibniz 1903, 356–399.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Leibniz 1890]G. W. Leibniz, New essays on human understanding,in Philosophical Works of Leibniz, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  109. G.W. Leibniz, Opuscles et fragments inédits de Leibniz,ed. by L. Couturat, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  110. M. Libardi, Teorie delle parti e dell’intero. Mereologie estensionali, Trento, Centro studi per la filosofia mitteleuropea.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Marek 1977 J.C. Marek, Österreichische Philosophie und ihr Einfluß auf die analy-tische Philosophie, vol. I, Conceptus, Innsbruck.

    Google Scholar 

  112. A. Marras, “The tomistic roots of Brentano’s conception of intentionality”, Rassegna di scienze filosofiche,213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  113. A. Marras, “Scholastic roots of Brentano’s conception of intentionality”, in McAlister 1976, 128–39.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Marty 1884–1895] A. Marty, “Über subjektlose Sätze und das Verhältnis der Grammatik zu Logik und Psychologie”, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie,1884–95 (seven papers).

    Google Scholar 

  115. A. Marty, Untersuchungen zur Allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie,Halle, Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Marty 1916 A. Marty, Gesammelte Schriften, edited by J. Eisenmeier, A. Kastil and O. Kraus, Bd. 1, Halle, Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  117. McAlister 1970 L. McAlister, “Franz Brentano and intentional inexistence”, in Journal of the History of Philosophy 8, 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  118. McAlister 1974–75 L. McAlister, “Chisholm and Brentano on intentionality”, Rewiew of Metaphysics,328–338.

    Google Scholar 

  119. F. Mayer-Hillebrand, “Franz Brentanos ursprüngliche und spätere Seinslehre und ihre Beziehungen zu Husserls Phänomenologie”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung,313–339.

    Google Scholar 

  120. -63 F. Mayer-Hillebrand, “Remarks concerning the interpretation of the philosophy of Franz Brentano. A reply to Dr. Srzednicki”, Philosophy and phenomenological research, 1962, 438–444; 1963, 445–446.

    Google Scholar 

  121. F. Mayer-Hillebrand, “Einleitung der Herausgeberin”, in Brentano 1966, 399–400 (Anmerkungen).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Mayer-Hillebrand 1969 F. Mayer-Hillebrand, Johannes Christian Michael Brentano, Innsbruck.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Meinong 1904 A. Meinong (ed.), Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psycho- logie, Leipzig, Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  124. A. Meinong, Uber Annahmen,2 ed. amply revised, Leipzig, Barth (1902). E. Melandri, Logica e esperienza in Husserl,Bologna, Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  125. E. Melandri, Contro il simbolico. Dieci lezioni di filosofia,Firenze, Ponte alle Grazie.

    Google Scholar 

  126. E. Melandri, Le Ricerche logiche di Husserl. Introduzione e commento alla Prima ricerca,Bologna, Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  127. F. Modenato, Coscienza ed essere in Franz Brentano, Bologna, Patron. E. Morscher, “Brentano and his place in Austrian philosophy”, in Chisholm adn Haller 1978, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  128. K. Mulligan (ed.), Speech acts and Sachverhalt. Reinach and the foundations of realist phenomenology,Dordrecht, Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Mulligan 1987a K. Mulligan, “Promising and other social acts. Their costituents and structure”, in Mulligan 1987a.

    Google Scholar 

  130. K. Mulligan (ed.), Mind, meaning and metaphysics. The philosophy and theory of language of Anton Marty,Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Mulligan, Language, truth and ontology,Kluwer, Dordrecht.1985 K. Mulligan and B. Smith, “F. Brentano on the ontology of mind”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, 637–644.

    Google Scholar 

  132. J.E. Murdoch, “Infinity and continuity”, in Kretzmann Kenny adn Pingborg 1982,564–587.

    Google Scholar 

  133. J. Pa§niczek, Theories of objects: Meinong and Twardowski,Lublin, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej.

    Google Scholar 

  134. S. Poggi, I sistemi dell ‘esperienza,Bologna, Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  135. R. Poli, “Brentano e Freud”, The object and its identity, Topoi Supplement 4, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  136. R. Poli, Ontologia formale,Genova, Marietti.

    Google Scholar 

  137. R. Poli, “Towards a non-symbolic semantic”, Brentano Studies 4, 22 1234.

    Google Scholar 

  138. R. Poli, “Twardowski and Wolff’ in Pa§niczek 1992, 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  139. R. Poli, “Le credenze fra logica e mondo. Reismo, pragmatismo e common-sense philosophy alle soglie del problema dell’analiticità”, in Albertazzi adn Poli 1993, 66–89.

    Google Scholar 

  140. R. Poli, “Twardowski’s theory of modification against the background of traditional logic”, Axiomathes 1, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  141. R. Poli, “Ontologia e logica in Franz Brentano: giudizi categorici e giudizi tetici”, Epistemologia 16, 39–76.

    Google Scholar 

  142. R. Poli (ed.), Consciousness, knowledge and truth,Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  143. R. Poli, “La teoria del giudizio in Franz Brentano e Anton Marty, giudizi tetici e giudizi doppi” (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  144. R. Poli, “The dispute over reism. Kotarbiriski-Ajdukiewicz-Brentano”, in Coniglione Poli adn Wolenski 1993, 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  145. M. Puglisi, “Prefazione del traduttore”, Brentano 1913, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  146. M. Puglisi, “Franz Brentano (Notizie e ricordi)”, Bilychnis, 1–12Riondato 1961

    Google Scholar 

  147. R. Richardson, “Brentano on intentional inexistence and the distinction between mental and psychical phenomena”, Archiv far Geschichte der Philosophie 65, 250–282.

    Google Scholar 

  148. E. Riondato, “L’aristotelismo di Franz Brentano e il suo influsso sulla cultura filosofica italiana”, in Atti del II convegno internazionale di studi italo-tedeschi,Merano, 341–345.

    Google Scholar 

  149. G. Rossi, Giudizio e raziocinio. Studi sulla logica dei brentaniani,Milano, Sodalitas.

    Google Scholar 

  150. B. Rothenberg, Studien zur Logik Franz Brentanos,Dissertation, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Schad 1984] A. Santucci, “Franz Brentano e i pragmatisti italiani”, in Albertazzi adn Poli 1993, 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  152. B. Schad, Die Aschaffenburger Brentanos. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Familie aus unbekanntem Nachlaß-Material,Aschaffenburg, Geschichtsund Kunstverein Aschaffenburg e. V.

    Google Scholar 

  153. Sellars 1958 E. Seiterich, Die Gottesbeweise bei Franz Brentano,Freiburg, Herder. J.R. Sellars, “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”, in Feigl adn Scriven 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  154. P. Simons, “A Brentanian basis for Lesniewskian logic”, Logique et Analyse 27, 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  155. P. Simons, Parts. A study in formal ontology,Oxford, Clarendon. P. Simons, “Brentano’s reform of logic”, Topoi,25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  156. F. Sirchia, “Filosofia e religione nel pensiero di Franz Brentano”, Rivista di filosofia neoscolastica 56, 649–680.

    Google Scholar 

  157. L. Skrbensky, Franz Brentano als Religionphilosoph,Zürich, Verlag der freigeistigen Vereinigung der Schweiz.

    Google Scholar 

  158. B. Smith (ed.), Parts and moments. Studies in logic and formal ontology,Munich/Vienna, Philosophia.

    Google Scholar 

  159. B. Smith, “The substance of Brentano’s ontology”, Topoi 6, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  160. B. Smith, “Brentano and Marty. An inquiry into being and truth”, in Mulligan 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  161. B. Smith, “The soul and its parts. A study in Aristoteles and Brentano”, Brentano Studien 1, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Smith 1988b]B. Smith, “The primacy of place. An investigation in Brentanian ontology”, Topoi 8, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  163. B. Smith, “On the phases of reism”, in Wolenski 1990, 170–174. B. Smith, “Caracteristica universalis”, in Mulligan 1992, 48–77.

    Google Scholar 

  164. B. Smith and K. Mulligan, “Pieces of a theory”, in Smith 1982, 2535.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Smith 1992] Smit H. Spiegelberg, The phenomenological movement, A historical introduction,The Hague/Boston/Lancaster, Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  166. H. Spiegelberg, “Der Begriff der Intentionalität in der Scholastik bei Brentano and bei Husserl”, Philosophische Hefte 5 (1936), repr. Studia Philosophica 29 (1970), 189–316.

    Google Scholar 

  167. P. Spinicci, “Realtà e rappresentazione. Saggio sulla genesi della filosofia dell’esperienza nel pensiero di Franz Brentano”, Rivista di storia della filosofia 2, 229–254.

    Google Scholar 

  168. J. Srzednicki, “Remarks concerning the interpretation of the philosophy of Franz Brentano”, in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,308–316.

    Google Scholar 

  169. J. Srzednicki, Franz Brentano’s analysis of truth,The Hague, Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Srzednicki 1961–1 J. Srzednicki, “Some elements of Brentano’s analysis of language and their ramifications”, in Revue International de Philosophie 20, 434–445.

    Google Scholar 

  171. W. Stegmüller, “Das Universalienproblem einst and jetz”, in Archiv für Philosophie, 1956, 192–225; 1957, 45–81.

    Google Scholar 

  172. W. Stegmüller, Metaphysik Skepsis Wissenschaft,2nd ed., Berlin, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  173. Stegmüller 1956–19 W. Stegmüller, Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie. Eine kritische Einführung,5th ed., Stuttgart, Kroner.

    Google Scholar 

  174. J. Stuart Mill, A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive, 1843.

    Google Scholar 

  175. C. Stumpf, Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung,Leipzig, S. Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  176. C. Stumpf, “Erinnerungen an Franz Brentano” in Kraus 1919, 89–149.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Stumpf 1873 W. Tatarkiewicz, Nineteenth century philosophy,Belmont (CA), Wadsworth Publishing Co. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  178. L. B. Terrell, “Brentano’s argument for reism”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 20, 446–458.

    Google Scholar 

  179. K. Twardowski, Zur Lehre vom Inhalt and Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung,Vienna, Holder, 1894; anast. repr. München/Wien, Philosophia.

    Google Scholar 

  180. E. Utitz, “Erinnerungen an Franz Brentano”, in Zeitschrii t für philosophische Forschung,102–110.

    Google Scholar 

  181. G. Vailati, Scritti,edited by M. Quaranta, Sala Bolognese, Arnaldo Forni ed., especially “Sulla portata logica della classificazione dei fatti mentali proposta dal prof. F. Brentano”, 336–340, “La distinzione tra conoscere e volere”, 626–629, “La ricerca dell’impossibile”, 659–666.

    Google Scholar 

  182. P. Valori, “Storia della fenomenologia husserliana”, in La fenomenologia, Atti dell’XI Convegno del Centro Studi Filosofici tra professori universitari, Gallarate 1955, Brescia, La scuola, 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  183. S. Vanni Rovighi, Studi di filosofia medioevale,Milano, Vita e pensiero.

    Google Scholar 

  184. F. Volpi, Heidegger e Brentano. L ‘aristotelismo e il problema dell ‘univocità dell ’essere nella formazione del giovane M. Heidegger,Padova, Cedam.

    Google Scholar 

  185. J. Wolenski (ed.), Kotarbiriski: Logic, semantics and ontology,Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  186. E. Zalta, Intensional logic and the metaphysics of intentionality. Cambridge Mach., The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  187. M. Zanatta, “La genesi e il significato dottrinale delle categorie”, in Aristotele 1989, 7–298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Massimo Libardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Trento, Trento, Italy

    Liliana Albertazzi  & Roberto Poli  & 

  2. Centro Studi fer la Mitteleuro Trento, Trento, Italy

    Massimo Libardi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Libardi, M. (1996). Franz Brentano (1838–1917). In: Albertazzi, L., Libardi, M., Poli, R. (eds) The School of Franz Brentano. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, vol 52. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8676-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8676-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4628-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8676-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation