Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 169))

  • 291 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the way to dissolve the adversary either/or position represented by realism and antirealism by suggesting the complementarity approach which was so successfully introduced by Niels Bohr in his revolutionary way of thinking applied to modern physics. Bohr himself hoped that one day the complementarity principle would become the backbone of everyone’s education and would be applied in the entire spectrum of our society. However, Bohr’s approach is regarded as revolutionary only in the western philosophico-scientific tradition. Outside of it there are similar philosophical, moral, and spiritual perspectives to be found in Taoism, Buddhism, Upanishads, and Jainism whose followers regard complementarity of Bohr as more-or-less commonplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Abbé of Galiana (1728–1787) quoted by John Wheeler, in his address at the ceremony conferring the Atoms for Peace Award on Niels Bohr, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wigner, Eugene (1967). Symmetries and Reflections, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Isaac Newton himself hoped to explain with his mechanistic laws only “all corporeal things”, still maintaining an existence of non-corporeal ones. Mathematicians and logicians due to their a prioristic approaches were outside of the realist-materialistic orbits.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lenin, Vladimir I. (1952). Materialism and Empiriocriticism, Critical comments on a Reactionary Philosophy, 1909 (originally published), Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wheeler, John Archibald (1982). ‘Physics and Austerity — Laws without Laws’, working paper, Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, p. 32f.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Müller, Johannes (1834–1840). Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen. “Sensation consists in the sensorium’s receiving through the medium of the nerves, and as a result of the action of an external cause, a knowledge of certain qualities or conditions, not of external bodies, but of nerves themselves.” Müller’s quotation is in

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Boring (1950). A History of Experimental Psychology, 2nd ed., Appleton, New York, p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krejci, R. (1996). Dissolution of the Realism/Antirealism Problem. In: Cohen, R.S., Hilpinen, R., Renzong, Q. (eds) Realism and Anti-Realism in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 169. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4493-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8638-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics