Abstract
This paper investigates the way to dissolve the adversary either/or position represented by realism and antirealism by suggesting the complementarity approach which was so successfully introduced by Niels Bohr in his revolutionary way of thinking applied to modern physics. Bohr himself hoped that one day the complementarity principle would become the backbone of everyone’s education and would be applied in the entire spectrum of our society. However, Bohr’s approach is regarded as revolutionary only in the western philosophico-scientific tradition. Outside of it there are similar philosophical, moral, and spiritual perspectives to be found in Taoism, Buddhism, Upanishads, and Jainism whose followers regard complementarity of Bohr as more-or-less commonplace.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Abbé of Galiana (1728–1787) quoted by John Wheeler, in his address at the ceremony conferring the Atoms for Peace Award on Niels Bohr, 1957.
Wigner, Eugene (1967). Symmetries and Reflections, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, p. 189.
Isaac Newton himself hoped to explain with his mechanistic laws only “all corporeal things”, still maintaining an existence of non-corporeal ones. Mathematicians and logicians due to their a prioristic approaches were outside of the realist-materialistic orbits.
Lenin, Vladimir I. (1952). Materialism and Empiriocriticism, Critical comments on a Reactionary Philosophy, 1909 (originally published), Moscow.
Wheeler, John Archibald (1982). ‘Physics and Austerity — Laws without Laws’, working paper, Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, p. 32f.
Müller, Johannes (1834–1840). Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen. “Sensation consists in the sensorium’s receiving through the medium of the nerves, and as a result of the action of an external cause, a knowledge of certain qualities or conditions, not of external bodies, but of nerves themselves.” Müller’s quotation is in
E. Boring (1950). A History of Experimental Psychology, 2nd ed., Appleton, New York, p. 82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krejci, R. (1996). Dissolution of the Realism/Antirealism Problem. In: Cohen, R.S., Hilpinen, R., Renzong, Q. (eds) Realism and Anti-Realism in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 169. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4493-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8638-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive