Advertisement

Elk Theories — A Galilean Strategy for Validating a New Scientific Discovery

  • Neil Thomason
Chapter
Part of the Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 12)

Abstract

In January 1610, Galileo turned his telescope toward Jupiter and soon afterwards announced that he had discovered four moons circling it. Although a considerable controversy ensued, by the summer of 1611 a consensus had emerged among the knowledgeable that the telescope was reliable (at least in this case) in the super-lunar realm and that the Jovian system was real. This is a remarkably fast closure of serious debate about a complex scientific issue, considering the slowness of early 17th century communication, the problematic nature of the new instrument and the importance of the astronomical discovery.

Keywords

Geiger Counter Telescopic Observation Moon Illusion Litmus Paper Celestial Equator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brown, H.I. (1985) ‘Galileo, the Telescope and the Eye’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 46: 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler, S. (1854) Complete Poetical Works, Volume II.Google Scholar
  3. Chalmers, A. (1990) Science and Its Fabrication, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  4. Débarbat, S. and Wilson, C. (1989) The Galilean Satellites of Jupiter from Galileo to Cassinni, Romer and Bradley’ in Taton and Wilson (eds.) (1989), pp. 144–57.Google Scholar
  5. Drake, S. (1957) Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, translated with an introduction and notes by Stillman Drake, Anchor Books, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Drake, S. (1976) ‘Galileo’s First Telescopic Observations’, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 7: 153–68.Google Scholar
  7. Drake, S. (1978) >Galileo at Work. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Drake, S. (1979) ‘Galileo and Satellite Prediction’, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 10: 75–95.Google Scholar
  9. Drake, S. (1983) Telescopes, Tides, and Tactics: A Galilean Dialogue about the Starry Messenger and Systems of the World. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Feyerabend, P. (1975) Against Method. First Edition, Verso Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Finocchiaro, M. (1989) The Galileo Affair: A Documentary History, University of California Press, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  12. Frankel, H. (1978) ‘The Importance of Galileo’s Nontelescopic Observations Concerning the Size of the Fixed Stars’, Isis, 69: 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franklin, A. (1986) The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin, A. (1990) Experiment Right or Wrong. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Galilei, Galileo (1890–1910) Opera, 20 volumes; National Edition edited by Antonio Favaro, Florence.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franklin, A. (1610/1989) Sidereus Nuncius or The Sidereal Messenger, translated with commentary by Albert Van Helden, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Geymonat, L. (1965) Galileo Galilei: A Biography and Inquiry into his Philosophy of Science, translated by Stillman Drake, McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  17. Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Kosso, P. (1989) Observability and Observation in Physical Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhn, T.S. (1957) The Copernican Revolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  20. Machamer, P.K. (1973) ‘Feyerabend and Galileo: The Interaction of Theories, and the Reinter- pretation of Experience’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 4: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Python, Monty (1989) Monty Python’s Flying CircusJust the Words, Volume Two, Methuen- Mandarin Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  22. Rasmussen, N. (1993) ‘Facts, Artifacts, and Mosesomes: Practicing Epistemology with the Electron Microscope’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 24: 227–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosen, E. (1965) Kepler’s Conversation with Galileo’s Sidereal Messenger, Johnson Reprint Company.Google Scholar
  24. Segre, M. (1991) In the Wake of Galileo, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J.Google Scholar
  25. Stubbe, H. (1670) The Plus Ultra reduced to a Non Plus: Or, a Specimen of some Animadver sions upon the Plus Ultra of Mr. Glanvill, wherein sundry Errors of some Virtuosi are discovered, the Credit of the Aristotelians in part Re-advanced; and Enquiries made about the Advantages of the Ancient Education in England above the Novel and Mechanical. Printed for the Author.Google Scholar
  26. Taton, R. and Wilson, C. (eds.) (1989) Planetary Astronomy from the Renaissance to the Rise of Astrophysics. Part A: Tycho Brake to Newton. Volume 2 of The General History of Astronomy under the general editorship of Michael Hoskin, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Thomason, N. (1994) ‘The Power of ARCHED Hypotheses: Feyerabend’s Galileo as a Closet Rationalist’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45: 255–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Helden, A. (1974) ‘ ‘Annulo Cingitur’: The Solution of the Problem of Saturn’, Journal for the History of Astronomy: 155–74.Google Scholar
  29. Van Helden, A. (1989) ‘Galileo and Telescopic Astronomy’ in Taton and Wilson (eds.) 1989.Google Scholar
  30. Wallace, W. (1992) Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science Volume 137, Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil Thomason
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations