Skip to main content

Where are We Going with Do-Not-Resuscitate Policies?

  • Chapter
Legislating Medical Ethics

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 48))

  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

Whenever there are technologic advances in medicine, there are necessarily questions concerning their appropriate use. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a noteworthy exception to this statement. Questions about CPR concern the appropriateness of not using it. Developed as a means to respond to sudden, unexpected cardiac or respiratory arrest, CPR has given rise to a technologic imperative that mandates its use and which has spawned a sizable body of medical, legal, and bioethical literature, as well as institutional policies and procedures pertaining to decisions not to use it. In New York State, the Governor’s Task Force on Life and the Law has even issued a proposal for legislation governing such decisions [4].

This article is reprinted with the permission of the The New York State Journal of Medicine 86, 618–620, December 1986.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. American Hospital Association: 1985, The Patient’s Choice of Treatment Options, American Hospital Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: 1986, Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Medical Treatment, American Medical Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  3. New York Public Health Law, Article 29-B, Statute 413-A, Effective April 1, 1988. Reprinted in this volume, pp. 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  4. New York State Task Force on Life and The Law: 1986, Do Not Resuscitate Orders: The Proposed Legislation and Report of the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, New York State Government, Albany, New York. Reprinted, in part, in this volume, pp. 3–7, and pp. 381–413.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quill, T.E., Stankaitis, J.A. and Krause, C.R.: 1986, ‘The Effect of a Community Hospital Resuscitation Policy on Elderly Patients’, New York State Journal of Medicine 86, 622 – 625, reprinted in this volume, pp. 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenlaw, J. (1995). Where are We Going with Do-Not-Resuscitate Policies?. In: Baker, R., Strosberg, M.A., Bynum, J. (eds) Legislating Medical Ethics. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 48. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8593-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8593-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4438-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8593-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics