Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Taking Stock of Policies for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Perception and Practice

  • Chapter
Legislating Medical Ethics

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 48))

  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

In the waning hours of the 1987 legislative session, the New York State Legislature passed Article 29-B of the Public Health Law, commonly known as the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) law [25]. Based on a proposal by the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law [26], the law embodied a widely accepted consensus about policies that should guide advance decisions to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). That consensus reflected a judgment that CPR offered little or no benefit for some patients and should not be provided. The consensus also recognized the participation of patients, or surrogates for incapacitated patients, as an important part of the process for deciding whether an order to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be entered for patients in a hospital or other health care facility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 52 N.Y.2d 363, 420 N.E.2d 63, cert. denied, 454 U.S. 858 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Act of July 4, 1991. ch. 370 (amending N.Y. Public Health Law, 2965, 2967), this volume, pp. 445–454.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahronheim, J., Maheswaran S., and Rosenberg, C.: 1992 ‘Impact of Do-Not-Resuscitate Legislation on the Use of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Three Teaching Hospitals’, New York State Journal of Medicine, 92:181–185. See also this volume, pp. 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Assembly Bill No. A 7166, New York State Assembly, May 1993

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker, R.: 1995, ‘The Legitimation and Regulation of DNR Orders’, this volume, pp. 33–101.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, R.: 1995, ‘A Review of the Empirical Studies of the DNR Law and a Rejoinder to Tracy Miller’, this volume, pp. 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, R., Strosberg, M., et al.: 1994, ‘The 1988 Do-Not-Resuscitate Reforms: A Comparative Study of the Impact of the New York DNR Law and the JCAHO Accreditation Requirements for DNR Policy’, this volume, pp. 263–301.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bedell, S. and Pelle, D. et al.: 1986, ‘Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders for Critically Ill Patients in the Hospital — How Are They Used and What is Their Impact’, Journal of the American Medical Association 256, 233–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedell, S. and Delbanco, T.: 1984, ‘Choices About Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Hospital: When Physicians Talk with Patients’, New England Journal of Medicine 310, 1089–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blackhall, L.: 1987, ‘Must We Always Use CPR?’, New England Journal of Medicine 317, 1281–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association: 1991, ‘Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders’, Journal of the American Medical Association 265, 1868–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dersch, V.: 1992, Summary of Written Responses by Critical Care Nurses, Unpublished manuscript version of the essay in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dersch, V.: 1995, ‘Differences in Clinician Reactions to the New York DNR’, this volume, pp 303–321.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fader, R., and Gambert, et al.: 1989, ‘Implementing a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Policy in a Nursing Home’, 1989, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 37, 544–48.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Farber, S.: 1988, [Letter] New England Journal of Medicine 318, 1757–58.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Finucane, T., Shumway, J. et al.: 1988, “Planning with Elderly Outpatients for Contingencies of Severe Illness,” Journal of General Internal Medicine 3, 322–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. High, D.: 1988, ‘All in the Family: Extended Autonomy and Expectations in Surrogate Health Care Decision-Making’, Gerontologist 28, Suppl.: 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. High D., and Turner, H.: 1987, ‘Surrogate Decision-Making: The Elderly’s Familial Expectations’, Theoretical Medicine 8, 303–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kamer, R., Dieck, E. et al.: 1990 ‘Effect of New York State’s Do-Not-Resuscitate Legislation on In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Practice’, American Journal of Medicine, 88, 108–11, reprinted in this volume, pp. 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lantos, J., Singer, P. et al.: 1989, ‘The Illusion of Futility in Clinical Practice’, American Journal of Medicine 87, 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lo, B., McLeod, G. et al.: 1986, ‘Patient Attitudes to Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment’, Archives of Internal Medicine 146, 1613–1615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Longo, E.: 1988, ‘Extent of DNR Policies Varies Across Health Care Settings’, Health Progress June, 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, T.: 1995, ‘An Assessment of the Union College Study and a Response to Robert Baker’s Analysis of the DNR Law’, this volume, pp. 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murphy, D.: 1988, ‘Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Time for Reappraisal in Long-term Care Institutions’, Journal of the American Medical Association 260, 2098–2101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. New York Public Health Law Art. 29-B, 2960–2978 (McKinney 1992), this volume, pp. 381–413.

    Google Scholar 

  26. New York State Department of Health, Medical Society of New York State, and the Hospital Association of New York State: 1990, ‘Do Not Resuscitate Orders: Questions and Answers for Health Care Professionals’, this volume, pp. 415–438.

    Google Scholar 

  27. New York State Task Force on Life and the Law.: 1986, Do Not Resuscitate Orders: The Proposed Legislation and Report of the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, New York, New York. Reprinted in part in this volume, pp. 3–7, and pp. 381–413.

    Google Scholar 

  28. New York State Task Force on Life and the Law: 1992, When Others Must Choose: Deciding for Patients without Capacity, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ouslander, J., Tymchuk, A., and Rahbar, B.: 1989, ‘Health Care Decisions Among Elderly Long-Term Care Residents and Their Potential Proxies’, Archives of Internal Medicine 149, 1367–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Plowe, C.: 1988, ‘Letter to the Editor’, New England Journal of Medicine 318, 1758.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Praeger, K.: 1989, ‘How CPR Can Threaten the Desperately Ill’, Wall Street Journal, March 9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quill, T. and Bennett, N.: 1995, ‘The Effects of a Hospital Policy and State Legislation on Resuscitation. Orders for Geriatric Patients’, this volume, pp. 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Report of the Special January Third Additional 1983 Grand Jury concerning “Do not resuscitate procedures at a certain hospital in Queens” (Sup. Ct., Queens Co., Feb. 8, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosner, F.: 1988, ‘Must We Always Offer the Option of CPR: The Law in New York’, Journal of the American Medical Association 260, 3129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schneiderman, L., Jecker, N., and Jonsen, A.: 1990, ‘Medical Futility: Its Meaning and Ethical Implications’, Annals of Internal Medicine 112, 949–54.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schonwether, R., Tesdale, T. et al.: 1991, ‘Educating the Elderly Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decisions Before and After Intervention’, Journal of the American Geriatric Society 39, 372–377.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shmerling, R., Bedell, S. et al.: 1988, ‘Discussing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Study of Elderly Outpatients’, Journal of General Internal Medicine 3, 317–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Spritz, N.: 1994, ‘The New York State DNR Law: Views of the members of the New York Chapter of the American College of Physicians’, this volume, pp. 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Steinberg, A. Fitter, J. et al.: 1986, ‘Patient Participation in Treatment Decision-Making in the Nursing Home: The Issue of Competence’, Gerontologist 26, 362–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Swender, P.: 1989, ‘Reflections on the New York Do-Not-Resuscitate Law’, New York State Journal of Medicine 89, 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Swidler, R.: 1989, ‘The Presumption of Consent in New York State’s Do-Not-Resuscitate Law’, New York State Journal of Medicine 89, 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Testimony at Public Hearings before the New York State Senate amd Assembly Health Committees, February, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tomlinson, T., and Brody, H.: 1990, ‘Futility and the Ethics of Resuscitation’, Journal of the American Medical Association 264, 1276–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Uhlmann, R., Pearlman R. and Cain, K.: 1988, “Physicians’ and Spouses’ Predictions of Elderly Patients’ Resuscitation Preferences,” Journal of Gerontology, 43, M115–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wetle, T., Levkoff, S. et al.: 1988 ‘Nursing Home Resident Participation in Medical Decisions: Perceptions and Preferences’ Gerontologist 28, Suppl.: 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Youngner, S.: 1988, ‘Who Defines Futility?’, Journal of the American Medical Association 260, 2094–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zweibel, N. and Cassel, C.: 1989, ‘Treatment Choices at the End of Life: A Comparison of Decisions by Older Patients and Their Physician Selected Proxies’, Gerontologist 29, 615–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Tracy E. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Philosophy, Union College, Schenectady, NY, USA

    Robert Baker

  2. Graduate Management Institute, Union College, Schenectady, NY, USA

    Martin A. Strosberg

  3. Dept. of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Jonathan Bynum

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, T.E. (1995). Taking Stock of Policies for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Perception and Practice. In: Baker, R., Strosberg, M.A., Bynum, J. (eds) Legislating Medical Ethics. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 48. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8593-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8593-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4438-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8593-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation