Abstract
One of the aims of professional schools (law, business administration, medicine) is to teach their students in such a way that they will graduate with the knowledge and professional and interpersonal skills required for later practice. We suppose that our teaching and students’ learning will equip the graduates in such a way that they will be able to easily apply such knowledge and skills and stand out positively when compared with graduates of other kinds of schools or other faculties. Hearing that our graduates had to unlearn a great deal or came into practice with ‘two left hands’ is not what we hope for and not what we expect; also hearing that selection of our graduates by major business firms is hardly based on their success in school, but mainly on personality and the extra-curricular activities they have developed, does not convey the impression that a school is really training for the professions, or is training for expertise. Of course, remarks like these can be dismissed as chitchat, but let’s take them serious and let’s see whether economics students are trained for expertise or not. Therefore, we will first discuss features of expertise and expertise development. Next, we will argue whether students of economics and business administration develop along that line or whether they meet serious problems in learning the knowledge and skills that prepare them for later practice, and finally we will analyse the features of curricula that foster a undisturbed development and the conditions that might counteract the development and implementation of such a curriculum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). Hoe verwerven studenten wetenschappelijke expertise? (How do students acquire scientific expertise?). Invited address at the first Lustrum seminar ‘Wetenschappelijk opleiden voor beleid’ (scientific education for policy making) Faculteit der Bedrijfswetenschappen KUN. Nijmegen, May 14 1993.
Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1993, in press). The development of clinical reasoning expertise; Implications for teaching. In: J. Higgs & M. Jones (Eds.), Clinical reasoning skills. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Dahlgren, L. O., & Marton, F. (1978). Students’ conceptions of subject matter: An aspect of learning and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 3, 25–35.
Glazer, N. (1974). Schools in the minor professions. Minerva, 346.
Mandl, H., Grube, H., & Renkl, A. (1994, in press). Problems of knowledge utilization. In: W. J. Nijhof, & J. Streumer (Eds.). Flexibility and cognitive structure in vocational education. Utrecht: Lemma.
Mandl, H., Grube, H., & Renkl, A. (in press). Learning to apply: From “school garden instruction” to technology-based learning environments. In: S. Vosniadou, E. de Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives of the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Milter, R. G, & Stinson, J. E. (1994). Educating Leaders for the New Competitive Environment. In Gijselaers, W. H. et. al. (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Administration: the Case of Problem-based Learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic books.
Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On aquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 1–17.
Schreiber, A. T. H., Wielenga, W. J., & Breuker, J. A. (1993). KADS; a principled approach to knowledge-based system development. London: Academic Press
Vernooij, A. T. J., (1993a). Leren en destructie (learning and destruction). Paper presented at the Annual Educational Research Meeting. Maastricht, May 1993.
Vemooij, A. T. J., (1993b). Problem Solving Strategies In Gijselaers, W. H. et. al. (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Administration: the Case of Problem-based Learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vaatstra, R. F., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Expertise in auditing: case-representation differences between economy students, novice-auditors and experts. Presented at the Annual Conference of The American Educational Research Association. Atlanta, GA, 12–16 April 1993.
Voss, J. F., Blais, J., Means, M. L., Greene, T. R., & Ahwesh, E. (1986). Informal reasoning and subject matter knowledge in the solving of economics problems by naive and novice individuals. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 269–302.
Wilbrink, B. (1989). Arbeidsmarkt en curriculum economie. (SCO-rapport 198 ). Amsterdam: SCO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boshuizen, H.P.A. (1995). Teaching For Expertise. In: Gijselaers, W.H., Tempelaar, D.T., Keizer, P.K., Blommaert, J.M., Bernard, E.M., Kasper, H. (eds) Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Administration. Educational Innovation in Economics and Business, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8545-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8545-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4504-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8545-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive