Advertisement

Dynamic Aspect Trees

  • J. Seligman
  • A. Ter Meulen
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 247)

Abstract

It is well known, and notoriously problematic, that the meanings of noun phrases have both referential and descriptive aspects. The interplay between these elements is largely responsible for the intricacies of applications of logic to the semantics of single sentence.

Keywords

Current Node Static Content Narrative Text Dynamic Content Situation Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, J.: 1950, “Truth,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplement Vol. xxiv Google Scholar
  2. Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J.: 1987, The Liar: An Essay in Truth and Circularity. Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper, R.: 1986, “Tense and Discourse Location in Situation Semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy 9, pp. 17–36Google Scholar
  4. Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing CompanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galton, A.: 1984, The Logic of Aspect. An Axiomatic Approach. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M.: 1991, “Dynamic Predicate Logic,” Linguistics and Philosophy 14, pp. 39–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hinrichs, E.: 1985, A Compositional Semantics for Aktionsarten and NP Reference in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, Dept. of LinguisticsGoogle Scholar
  8. Hinrichs, E.: 1986, “Temporal Anaphora in Discourses of English,” Linguistics and Philosophy 9, pp. 63–82Google Scholar
  9. Kamp, H.: 1979, “Events, Instants and Temporal Reference,” in: R. Bauerle et al. (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 376–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kamp, H.: 1980, “Some Remarks on the Logic of Change,” in: Chr. Rohrer (ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers. Tubingen: Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 135–179Google Scholar
  11. Kamp, H. and Rohrer, Chr.: 1983, “Tense in Texts,” in: R. Bauerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 250–269Google Scholar
  12. Kamp, H. and Reyle, U.: 1993, From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PublishersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mourelatos, A.: 1978, “Events, States and Processes,” Linguistics and Philosophy 2/3, pp. 415–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Partee, B.: 1984, “Nominal and Temporal Anaphora,” Linguistics and Philosophy 7, pp. 243–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Seligman, J.: 1992, Situated Consequence in Elementary Situation Theory, Indiana University Logic Group, Preprint No. IULG-92–16Google Scholar
  16. Ter Meulen, A.: 1990, Aspectual Verbs as Generalized Quantifiers, WCCFL 9 Proceedings, CSLI Lecture Notes. Stanford. Distributed by the University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Ter Meulen, A.: 1992, “How to Preserve Information in a Dynamic Environment: Trees for Temporal Reasoning,” Proceedings from the Bonas workshop, IRIT, University of ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  18. Ter Meulen, A.: (forthcoming), Representing Time in Natural Language. The Dynamic Interpretation of Tense and Aspect. Cambridge: Bradford Books, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomason, S.: 1979, “Possible Worlds, Times and Tenure”,??Google Scholar
  20. Van Benthem, J.: 1988, A Manual of Intensional Logic. 2nd. edition. CSLI Lecture Notes 1. CSLI PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Vendler, Z.: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Verkuyl, H.: 1972, On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Foundations of Language, Supplementary Series 15. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Seligman
  • A. Ter Meulen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations