Abstract
I start by looking at what is involved in moving from a snail in a ginger beer bottle, through sulphites in underpants and antimony sulphide in manganese, to a lift in a shaft. Lawyers from the Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions will recognise these facts as coming from cases in the law of delict or tort and they will recognise that I am starting with the famous case of Donoghue v. Stevenson. Here it was held that Mrs Donoghue, who was made ill by starting to drink, in a café, a bottle of ginger beer in which she claimed there had been a decomposing snail, had a remedy in negligence against the manufacturer with whom she had no contractual relation. Lord Atkin said:
A manufacturer of products, which he sells in such a form as to show that he intends them to reach the ultimate consumer in the form in which they left him with no reasonable possibility of intermediate examination, and with the knowledge that the absence of reasonable care in the preparation of putting up the products will result in an injury to the consumer’s life or property, owes a duty of care to the consumer to take reasonable care. ([1932] A.C. at 599)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bell, J. 1986. ‘The Acceptability of Legal Argument’ in The Legal Mind, (eds) MacCormick, D.N., and Birks, P., Oxford University Press, Oxford; pp. 44–65.
Detmold, M. J., 1984. The Unity of Law and Morality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Dworkin, R., 1986. Law’s Empire, Fontana, London.
Fisher, H. (ed) The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fried C, 1982. ‘The Artificial Reason of the Law, or: What Lawyers Know’, in Texas Law Review 60, 1982 pp. 35–58.
Golding, M., 1984. Legal Reasoning, Borzoi Books, New York.
Hart, H. L. A., 1961. The Concept of Law, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Hay, D., 1984. ‘The Criminal Prosecution in England and its Historians’, Modern Law Review 1984 pp. 1–29
Kafka, F., 1946. ‘Von den Gleichnissen’ in Brod, M. (ed), Beschreibung eines Kampfes, Novellen, Skizzen, Aphorismen aus dem Nachlaβ, Fischer Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
Kripke, S., 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Blackwell, Oxford
Krygier, M, 1986. ‘Law as Tradition’, in Journal of Law and Philosophy, 1986, pp. 237–262.
Popper, K., 1969. ‘Towards a Rational Theory of Tradition’ in Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Postema, G., 1987. ‘The Roots of Our Notion of Precedent’ in Goldstein, L. (ed) Precedent in Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Simmonds, N., 1984. The Decline of Juridical Reason, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bankowski, Z. (1995). Analogical Reasoning and Legal Institutions. In: Bankowski, Z., White, I., Hahn, U. (eds) Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8531-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8531-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4542-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8531-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive