Skip to main content

Analogical Reasoning and Legal Institutions

  • Chapter
  • 226 Accesses

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 21))

Abstract

I start by looking at what is involved in moving from a snail in a ginger beer bottle, through sulphites in underpants and antimony sulphide in manganese, to a lift in a shaft. Lawyers from the Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions will recognise these facts as coming from cases in the law of delict or tort and they will recognise that I am starting with the famous case of Donoghue v. Stevenson. Here it was held that Mrs Donoghue, who was made ill by starting to drink, in a café, a bottle of ginger beer in which she claimed there had been a decomposing snail, had a remedy in negligence against the manufacturer with whom she had no contractual relation. Lord Atkin said:

A manufacturer of products, which he sells in such a form as to show that he intends them to reach the ultimate consumer in the form in which they left him with no reasonable possibility of intermediate examination, and with the knowledge that the absence of reasonable care in the preparation of putting up the products will result in an injury to the consumer’s life or property, owes a duty of care to the consumer to take reasonable care. ([1932] A.C. at 599)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bell, J. 1986. ‘The Acceptability of Legal Argument’ in The Legal Mind, (eds) MacCormick, D.N., and Birks, P., Oxford University Press, Oxford; pp. 44–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detmold, M. J., 1984. The Unity of Law and Morality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., 1986. Law’s Empire, Fontana, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. (ed) The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried C, 1982. ‘The Artificial Reason of the Law, or: What Lawyers Know’, in Texas Law Review 60, 1982 pp. 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, M., 1984. Legal Reasoning, Borzoi Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A., 1961. The Concept of Law, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D., 1984. ‘The Criminal Prosecution in England and its Historians’, Modern Law Review 1984 pp. 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, F., 1946. ‘Von den Gleichnissen’ in Brod, M. (ed), Beschreibung eines Kampfes, Novellen, Skizzen, Aphorismen aus dem Nachlaβ, Fischer Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S., 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Krygier, M, 1986. ‘Law as Tradition’, in Journal of Law and Philosophy, 1986, pp. 237–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K., 1969. ‘Towards a Rational Theory of Tradition’ in Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Postema, G., 1987. ‘The Roots of Our Notion of Precedent’ in Goldstein, L. (ed) Precedent in Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, N., 1984. The Decline of Juridical Reason, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bankowski, Z. (1995). Analogical Reasoning and Legal Institutions. In: Bankowski, Z., White, I., Hahn, U. (eds) Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8531-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8531-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4542-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8531-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics