Skip to main content

New Institutional Arrangements for the Next Generation of Environmental Policy Instruments: Intra- and Interpolicy-Cooperation

  • Chapter
Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments

Part of the book series: Environment, Science and Society ((ENSS,volume 3))

Abstract

It is hardly surprising that the European Science Foundation chose environmental policy instruments as the topic of one if its task forces on ‘environmental policy’. All contributions to this volume testify that environmental policy lacks the confidence that it can achieve its goals with the classical environmental policy instruments. After twenty years of hard work of implementation many policymakers arrived at the conclusion that its instruments have to be supplemented by new, more efficient tools. It seems that after a swift booming phase in the late 1970s and 1980s environmental policy, in the light of its current overarching political importance, has already for some time considerably transgressed the simple frame of ordinary policing in the field of health or industrial supervision. More recently, in the search for new instruments, theory and praxis environmental policy has borrowed increasingly from fiscal and tax policy.1 Moreover, the slowly adopted practice of environmental impact assessments had led to first attempts to build a bridge with industrial, land use and infrastructure policy.2 The EIS requires the application of environmental law in the planning and realization of new projects of all governmental policies of environmental relevance. The postulate has always been included in all the relevant laws and at least since the Single European Act of Luxembourg (1987) it figured in the pertinent body of primary law of the European Community (Art. 130 R, Para. 2). In the Maastricht Treaties it received an additional normative reinforcement.3

We would like to thank Dr. Stefan Kuks and Dagmar Kollande for the translation of parts of this text from German to English as well as Enzo Matafora and Dr. Giorgio Sailer for their assistance in Chapter 4 (scenarios).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Amongst others D. Helm, Economic Policy Toward the Environment, Oxford (Basil-Blackwell Inc.) 1991; Th. Tietenberg, Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 6, 1990; for Switzerland: R. Mauch/R. Iten/E.U. von Weizsäcker/J. Jesinghaus, Oekologische Steuerreform — Europäische Ebene und Fallbeispiele Schweiz, Chur and Zurich, 1992 and X. Oberson, Les taxes d’orientation, diss., Genève 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. P. Knoepfel, Zum Stand des Umweltrechts in der Schweiz/A Survey on Current Environmental Law in Switzerland, Cahiers de l’IDHEAP no 65, octobre 1989, p. 25 f., 57f.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. A. Epiney, H. Furrer, Umweltschutz nach Maastricht — Ein Europa der drei Geschwindigkeiten?, EuR 1992, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See P. Knoepfel, W. Zimmermann, in cooperation with G. Sailer, E. Matafora, Evaluation des BUWAL. Expertenbericht zur Evaluation der Luftreinhaltung, des landlichen Gewasserschutzes und der UVP des Bundes. EDMZ, Bern, 1991 and Rapport de la Commission de gestion du Conseil national du 18 mai 1992, FF vol. 3, no. 29 du 28 juillet 1991, p. 1422 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  5. This list is drawn from the Report on the State of Land Use from 1987: Conseil fédéral: Rapport sur l’Etat et l’évolution de l’utilisatiobn du sol et de l’urbanisation en Suisse (Rapport sur l’aménagement du territoire, 1987) du 14 déc. 1987, 87.074, p. 76 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Rapport de la Commission Popp sur `les paiements directs dans la politique agricole suisse’, Berne, 1990 and the 7th Report on the State of Agriculture, Berne, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See P.Knoepfel, L’agriculture et la gestion de l’environnement: Les instruments de gestion en Suisse, Cahiers de l’IDHEAP no. 60, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See D. Baroni, Brunner, P. Knoepfel, P. Moor, 1992: Strassenverkehrsrecht im Lichte des Umweltrechts — Le droit de la circulation routière face à la législation de l’environnement, Bale (Helbing & Lichtenhahn), Reihe Oekologie & Gesellschaft, vol. 5, 334 p.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See R. Imhof, W. Zimmermann, `Massnahmenplanung’ in Switzerland: The strategic air purification plan as an instrument of environmental policy in the field of urban traffic (International Congress: Implementing environmental policies by means of interpolicy cooperation, in Crans-Montana); D. Sperling, Marketable credits for vehicle emissions in California, ibid.; this question is in the center of the COST-Action no 618 concerning “Institution Building and Information Policies” with regard to air pollution control policies in big cities in Europe (programme “CITAIR”), decided by the COST-Council in May 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See P. Knoepfel, U. Müller, W. Zimmermann, Vorschlag für eine Programmatik sozialwissenschaftlicher Umweltforschung in der Schweiz, BUWAL-Schriftenreihe, Bern, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See P. Knoepfel, La protection de l’environnement en proie aux problèmes d’acceptation et aux déficits de mise en oeuvre. Mise en oeuvre de la législation environnementale: situation actuelle à la lumière des secteurs Industrie et Artisanat, Agriculture et Politique infrastructurelle de l’Etat, Cahiers de l’IDHEAP no. 70a, novembre 1991 (version française du Cahiers de l’IDHEAP no. 70), Lausanne, 40 p.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Report 1991 `Evaluation des BUWAL…’, op. cit., note 4, p. 57 ff. (direct translation).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid. p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid. p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid. p. 96 f.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See `Rapport de la Commission de gestion…’, op. cit., note 4, p. xy.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See ibid., p. 1449.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Report `Evaluation des BUWAL…’, op. cit. note 4, p. 132 ff. (direct translation).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 149 f. (direct translation).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cf. Ordinance on the Protection from Radioactive Radiation of June 30, 1976, SR 814.50.

    Google Scholar 

  21. SR 700.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sec. 46, par. 3, VwOG = Act on the Organization of Federal Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  23. SR 172.010.15.

    Google Scholar 

  24. According to sec. 60, par. 2, VwOG.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See P. Knoepfel, La protection de l’environnement en proie aux problèmes d’acceptation et aux déficits de mise en oeuvre. Mise en oeuvre de la législation environnementale: situation actuelle à la lumière des secteurs Industrie et Artisanat, Agriculture et Politique infrastructurelle de l’Etat, Cahiers de l’IDHEAP no. 70a, novembre 1991, Lausanne, pp. 12, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  26. On the basis of sec. 55, VwOG.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Institutionalized by sec. 55, VwOG.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See the article by J. Klok, A Classification of Instruments for Environmental Policies, in this book.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See P. Saladin, Probleme des langfristigen Umweltschutzes, in: Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft, 1989, pp. 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See P. Knoepfel, M. Descloux, Valeurs limites d’immissions: choix politiques ou déterminations scientifiques?, Cahiers de l’IDHEAP no. 48, Lausanne, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Theoretically already required: See Office fédéral pour la protection de l’environnement, Etude de l’impact Sui l’environnement, Manuel EIE, Berne 1990, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See F. Ramade, L’écologie et le décideur. Les limites de la prise en compte des données scientifiques dans les politiques de l’environnement, in: J. Theys (assisté de V. Liber et M.-P. Palacios) (ed.), Environnement, science et politique, publication réalisée avec le concours financier du Service de la rechercher du Ministère de l’environnement (SRETIE), Cahier de GERMES, no 13, Paris, 1991, p. 381 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See R. Czada, Administrative Interessenvermittlung… am Beispiel der kerntechnischen Sicherheitsregulierung in den Vereinigten Grosstaaten und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Habilitationsschrift zur Erlangung einer Venia legendi in Politischer Wissenschaft und Verwaltungswissenschaft, Universität Konstanz, March 1992, p. 120 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See art. 3 B within the Treaty of Maastricht as well as art. 130 R, Para 2 of the EC-Treaties. (See A. Epiney, H. Furre, op. cit., N. 3)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Definition of emission quotas per zone-unit (ha) as already applied in the field of agriculture (dung units per hectare).

    Google Scholar 

  36. The only case of such an absolute priority in the Swiss environmental law is the (constitutional) obligation to protect moorelands (popular initiative introducing Sec. 24 sexies accepted in the votation of Dec. 6, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  37. The history of the French Environmental Agency, which changed its status since its creation in 1972 at least six times shows that the policy contents largely influenced by the `Corps des ingénieurs des mines’ hardly ever changed.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Widely applied for instance in Switzerland and Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See e.g. M. Glantz (ed.), Societal Responses to Regional Climatic Change: Forecasting by Analogy, Boulder (West View Press), 1988 and C. Jaeger, Innovative Milieus and Environmental Awareness, in: Sociologia Internationalis, vol. 28, 2, pp. 205–216; D. Nir, Region as Social-Environmental System: An Introduction to a Systemic Regional Geography, Dordecht (Kluwer), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  40. In the US the waste treatment industry occupies already 3% of the active population. In France, the closing of the frontier against solid waste importation, proposed by the Minister of the Environment at the end of August 1992, provoked serious opposition from the Ministry of Economy aiming at protecting the economically increasingly important waste disposal industry.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knoepfel, P. (1995). New Institutional Arrangements for the Next Generation of Environmental Policy Instruments: Intra- and Interpolicy-Cooperation. In: Dente, B. (eds) Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments. Environment, Science and Society, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8504-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8504-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4428-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8504-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics