Skip to main content

Policy Instruments, Public Deliberation and Evaluation Processes

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Environment, Science and Society ((ENSS,volume 3))

Abstract

Evaluation can not only serve as a means of measuring or appraising the performance of policy instruments but also to foster consensus building among the different actors involved. This is done through a social learning process that involves discussing the criteria used to evaluate how effective the measures adopted are in terms of the problem or problems a specific policy is intended to address. In this latter sense, evaluation is also a policy instrument, particularly in the case of policies that require a change in human behaviour or where there is little consensus about which variables should be used to measure the effectiveness of the policy adopted.

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

And God saw everything that He made. “Behold,” God said, “it is very good”.

And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

And on the seventh day God rested from all his work. His archangel came then unto Him asking, “God, how do you know that what you have created is ‘very good’? What are your criteria? On what data have you based your judgement? Aren’t you a little too close to the situation to make a fair and unbiased evaluation?” God thought about these questions all that day and His rest was greatly disturbed. On the eighth day God said: “Lucifer, go to hell”.

Thus was evaluation born in a blaze of glory. (Patton 1986, 1.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aguilar, S. (1992) Políticas Medioambientales y Disenos Institucionales en Espana y Alemania: La Comunidad Europea Como Escenario de Negociación de una Nueva Area Politica, PhD Thesis, Madrid (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballart, X. (1992) Evaluación de Programas y Servicios Públicos, INAP, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, C.J. (1987) Pesticide and Politics, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A. and Wildaysky, A. (1987) What should evaluation mean to implementation, in Palumbo (ed), The Politics of Program Evaluation, Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 146–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A.S. (1983) Stakeholder Based Evaluation, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. (1966) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Skokie, Ill., Rand-MacNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, C.J. (1980) Toward Reform of Program Evaluation, San Francisco CA, Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dente, B. (1989) Politiche Pubbliche e Pubblica Amministrazione, Rimini, Maggioli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez Orea, D. (1988) Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental, in Ciudad y Territorio, n. 75, pp. 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. and Lincoln Y.S. (1981) Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Trough Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. and Thomas, J.M. (1989) Making policies in regulatory bureaucracies, in Hawkins-Thomas(eds), Making Regulatory Policies, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellstern, G.M. (1985) Assessing evaluation research, in Kaufmann-Majone-Ostrom (eds), Guidance, Control and Evaluation in the Public Sector, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 279–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. (1982) Preface to Evaluation Studies, in Evaluation Review Annual 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (1992) Evaluation, in Harrop, M. (ed), Power and Policy in Liberal Democracies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, S. (1981) What Price Incentives?, Auburn House, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klok, P.J. A Classification of Instruments for Environmental Policy, ESF, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, L.I. (1980) Discovering Wether Programs Work: A Guide to Statistical Methods for Program Evaluation, Glenview, Ill, Scott-Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewansky, R. (1990) La politica ambientale, in Dente (ed), Le Politiche Pubbliche in Italia, Il Mulino, Bolonia, pp. 281–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E. (1990) Inquiry and Change, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G.D. (1989) Evidence, Argument and Persuasion, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G.D. (1991) Public policy beyond the headlines, EUI Working Papers in Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnier, E. (1987), Evaluation de l’Action des Pouvoirs Publics, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morehouse, T.A. (1972) Program evaluation social research versus public policy, in Public Administration Review, pp. 868–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, D.J. (1987) Politics and evaluation, in Palumbo (ed), The Politics of Program Evaluation, Newbury Park, Sage, pp. 12–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1986) Utilization focused Evaluation, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1987) Evaluations political inherency. Practical implications for design and use, in Palumbo (ed), The Politics of Program Evaluation, Newbury Park, Sage, pp. 100–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H. and Freeman, H.E. (1985) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. (1988) Managing environmental risk: The case of Asarco, Case Program. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E. (1975) Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach, Merrill, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolchin, S.J. (1987) The political uses of evaluation research: cost-benefit analysis and the cotton dust standard, in Palumbo (ed), The Politics of Program Evaluation, Newbury Park, Sage, pp. 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. (1972), Evaluation Research, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildaysky, A. (1979) The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Subirats, J. (1995). Policy Instruments, Public Deliberation and Evaluation Processes. In: Dente, B. (eds) Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments. Environment, Science and Society, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8504-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8504-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4428-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8504-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics