Skip to main content

Arguments, Assumptions and the Choice of Policy Instruments

The case of the debate on the CO2/energy tax in the European Community

  • Chapter
Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments

Part of the book series: Environment, Science and Society ((ENSS,volume 3))

Abstract

An analysis of the arguments and rationales given by the actors in the field of environmental policy may help us understand why certain policy instruments are or are not adopted, and why they are or are not effective in dealing with the problems at hand. Rather than being a study on the implementation process, the following pages will focus on the design and selection of policy instruments. The reason for this is that problems inherent in the formulation of instruments will influence their adoption and implementation. Research on the implementation of policy instruments is necessary to discern the difficulties to be faced when theories are put into practice and general concepts are put into a specific context; but more attention to the very development of policy instruments is needed to understand why certain instruments (among the many possible ones) are adopted and are successfully or unsuccessfully implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ash, P. (1988) Consumer Safety Regulation. Putting a Price on Life and Limb, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1982) Political participation as rational action, in B. Barry and R. Hardin (eds), Rational Man and Irrational Society?, Sage, Beverly Hills, London, New Dehly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, J. and Wade-Gery, W. (1995) Addressing Uncertainty: Law, Policy and the Precautionary principle,this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capros, P., Karadeloglu, P., Manztzos, L. and Mentzas, G. (1991) Impact of Energy and Carbon Tax on CO 2 Emissions, Report for DG XII of the E.C. Commission, Joule Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coherence, D. (1991) Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of CO 2 Reduction Options, Report for DG XII of the E.C. Commission, Joule Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRI (1992) Impact of a Package of E.C. Measures of Control CO 2 Emissions on European Industry, Final Report (draft report completed in November 1991), Prepared for DG XI of the European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K. (1987) Learning and the evolution of social systems. An epigenetic perspective, in M. Schmid, and F. Wuketis (eds), Evolutionary Theory in Social Science, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy in Europe (1990) Special Issue, Energy for a New Century: The European Perspective, E.C. Commission, DG X VII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilmot, J.F., McGlue, D., Valette, P. and Waeterloos, C. (1986) Energy 2000, published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the E.C. Commission, DG XIII, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. (1990) When Knowledge is Power. Three Models of Change in International Organizations, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Bacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1990) Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy-Making in Britain, Estudio/Working Paper 1990/4, Instituto Juan March, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1990) Policymakers’ Summary of the Report of Working Group 1 on scientific assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, S. (1981) What Price Incentives? Economists and the Environment, Auburn House Publ. Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klok, P.J. (1995) A Classification of Instruments for Environmental Policy, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppen, I. (1988) The European Community’s Environmental Policy: From the Summit in Paris, 1972, to the Single European Act, 1987. EUI Working Paper, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larme, C. (1995) Political (un)feasibility of environmental economic instruments,this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberatore, A. (1991) Problems of transnational policymaking: environmental policy in the European Community, European Journal for Political Research (19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1965) The Intelligence of Democracy. Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1989) Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. (1986) Kollektive Lernprozesse, Surkamp, Frankfurt/Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mors, M. (1991) The Economic of Policies to Stabilize or Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Case of CO 2, internal paper, E.C. Commission, DG I I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, E. and Clark, W. (1991) Learning to Management Global Environmental Change: A Review of Relevant Literature, Contribution n.8 to the project “Social Learning in the Management of Global Environment Risks”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D., Markandya, A. and Barbier, E. (1989) Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan Publications Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzorno, A. (1983) Sulla razionalità della scelta democratica, Stato e Mercato (7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. and Ordeshook, P. (1968) A theory of the calculus of voting, American Political Science Review (62).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (1990) Behavioral assumptions of policy tools, Journal of Politics (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, M. and Thompson, M. (1990), Divided We Stand. Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. (1986) Blind spots in policy analysis. What economics doesn’t say about energy use, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Task Force (1898) Report on the Environment and the Internal Market, Brussels, E.C. Commission, DG X I.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liberatore, A. (1995). Arguments, Assumptions and the Choice of Policy Instruments. In: Dente, B. (eds) Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments. Environment, Science and Society, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8504-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8504-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4428-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8504-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics