Skip to main content

Capacity as a Commitment Instrument in Multi-Market Competition

  • Chapter
Market Evolution

Part of the book series: Studies in Industrial Organization ((SIOR,volume 20))

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

In capital-intensive industries, investments in production capacity can be instruments in competition and, in particular, in entry deterrence. The incumbent firm’s strategy will take into account the identity of the entrant because new firms pose a different threat than established-firm entrants (e.g., importers). The chapter argues that the appropriate framework is multi-market competition, where firms compete in several — product and factor — markets. The framework integrates both recent game-theoretic modeling as well as an older industrial economics, associated with P.W.S. Andrews. An example of the U.S. steel market illustrates that capacity is a commitment instrument only in a special, historic, setting.

I thank Arjen van Witteloostuijn for comments and the audiences of the 19th annual EARIE conference in Stuttgart, September 1992, and the EEA Summer School on New Trade and Growth Theory in Florence, September 1992, for lively discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, S.P. and Fischer, R.D. (1989) ‘Multi-market Oligopoly with Production before Sales’, Journal of Industrial Economics 38, 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P.W.S. (1949) Manufacturing Business, London, MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J.S. (1962) Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and Singh, N. (1990) ‘Entry-deterrence in Stackelberg Perfect Equilibria’, International Economic Review 31, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C. and Willig, R.D. (1982) Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D. and Whinston, M.D. (1990) ‘Multimarket Contact and Collusive Behavior’, RAND Journal of Economics 21, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J. (1981) ‘Intra-industry Trade in Identical Commodities’, Journal of International Economics 11, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J. and Krugman, P. (1983) ‘A “Reciprocal Dumping” Model of International Trade’, Journal of International Economics 15, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, E. (1961) ‘A Note on Potential Competition’, Journal of Industrial Economics 9, 248–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J.I., Geanakoplos, J.D. and Klemperer, P.D. (1985a) ‘Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements’, Journal of Political Economy 93, 488–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J.I., Geanakoplos, J.D. and Klemperer, P.D. (1985b) ‘Holding Idle Capacity to Deter Entry’, Economic Journal 95, 178–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, R.D. and Mahabir, D. (1988) ‘Contestability: A Revisionist View’, Economica 55, 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calem, P.S. (1988) ‘Entry and Entry Deterrence in Penetrable Markets’, Economica 55, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E. (1971) ‘International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment’, Economica 38, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E. and Porter, M.E. (1977) ‘From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 91, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewatripont, M. (1987) ‘Entry Deterrence under Trade Unions’, European Economic Review 31, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1980) ‘The Role of Investment in Entry-deterrence’, Economic Journal 90, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1986) ‘Comparative Statics for Oligopoly’, International Economic Review 27, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, H. (1985) ‘Strategic Investment in an Industry with a Competitive Product Market’, Journal of Industrial Economics 33, 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B.C. and Lipsey, R.G. (1979) ‘The Theory of Market Pre-emption: The Persistence of Excess Capacity and Monopoly in Growing Spatial Markets’, Economica 46, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B.C. and Lipsey, R.G. (1980) ‘Exit Barriers are Entry Barriers: the Durability of Capital as a Barrier to Entry’, Bell Journal of Economics 10, 721–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B.C. and Lipsey, R.G. (1981) ‘Capital, Commitment, and Entry Equilibrium’, Bell Journal of Economics 12, 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbaum, B. (1983) ‘The Internalization of Labor Markets: Causes and Consequences’, American Economic Review 73, 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1984) ‘The Fat-Cat Effect, The Puppy-Dog Ploy, and the Lean and

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungry Look’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 74 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (1984) ‘Capacity Expansion in the Titanium Dioxide Industry’, Journal of Industrial Economics 33, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (1986) ‘Sustainable Advantage’, Harvard Business Review, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (1991) Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. and Caves, R.E. (1986) ‘Capital Commitment and profitability: An Empirical Investigation’, in Morris, D.J. et al. (eds), Strategic Behaviour and Industrial Competition, 1986, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, C. (1991) ‘Wage Differentials, the Insider-Outsider Dilemma, and Entry-Deterrence’, Oxford Economic Papers 43, 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.A. (1990) ‘An Analysis of Preemptive Behavior in the Titanium Dioxide Industry’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 8, 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, H.H. (1957) “Effectiveness of ‘Entry’ by Already Established Firms”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 71, 132–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krattenmaker, Th.G. and Salop, S.C. (1986) Anticompetitive Exclusion: Raising Rivals’ Costs to Achieve Power over Price, Yale Law Journal 96, 209–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M.B. (1987) ‘Excess Capacity as a Barrier to Entry: An Empirical Appraisal’, Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopatka, J.E. and Godek, P.E. (1992) Another Look at Alcoa: Raising Rivals’ Costs Does not Improve the View, Journal of Law and Economics 35, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydall, H.F. (1955) ‘Conditions of New Entry and the Theory of Price’, Oxford Economic Papers 7, 300–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsui, A. (1989) ‘Consumer-benefited Cartels under Strategic Capital Investment Competition’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 7, 451–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1982) ‘Limit Pricing and Entry under Incomplete Information: An Equilibrium Analysis’, Econometrica 50, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C. (1988) ‘Subequilibrium in the North American Steel Industries: A Study of Short Run Biases from Regulation and Utilisation Fluctuations’, Economic Journal 98, 390–41 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. (1957) Increased Rents from Increased Costs: A Paradox of Value Theory, Journal of Political Economy 65, 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinger, M.A. (1988) ‘Vertical Mergers and Market Foreclosure’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salop, S.C. and Scheffman, D.T. (1983) ‘Raising Rivals’ Costs’, American Economic Review 73, 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salop, S.C. and Scheffman, D.T. (1987) ‘Cost Raising Strategies’, Journal of Industrial Economics 36, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. (1980) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago, Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1981) ‘Economics of Scale and Barriers to Entry’, Journal of Political Economy 89, 1228–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, R. (1988) ‘Empirical Evidence on Strategic Entry Deterrence’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 6, 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A.M. (1977) ‘Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing’, Bell Journal of Economics 8, 534–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A.M. (1979) ‘Investment Strategy and Growth in a New Market’, Bell Journal of Economics 10, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, B.J. and Brander, J.A. (1993) ‘Pre-Commitment and Flexibility: Applications to Oligopoly Theory’, European Economic Review 36, 1601–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spulber, D.F. (1981) ‘Capacity, Output, and Sequential Entry’, American Economic Review 71 503–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H.R. (1984) Microeconomic Analysis, New York, W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables, A.J. (1990) ‘International Capacity Choice and National Market Games’, Journal of International Economics 29, 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C.M. (1982) ‘Counter-competition Abroad to Protect Home Markets’, Harvard Business Review, 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegberg, M. van, and Witteloostuijn, A. van (1993) ‘Credible Entry Threats into Contestable Markets: A Symmetric Multimarket Model of Contestability’, Economica 59, 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1968) ‘Wage Rates as a Barrier to Entry: The Pennington Case’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 82, 85–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witteloostuijn, A van, and Wegberg, M. van (1992) ‘Multimarket Competition: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18, 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, G.S. (1982) Barriers to Entry, Lexington, MA, Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Wegberg, M. (1995). Capacity as a Commitment Instrument in Multi-Market Competition. In: van Witteloostuijn, A. (eds) Market Evolution. Studies in Industrial Organization, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8428-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8428-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4523-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8428-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics