Abstract
A popular notion or common picture of applied science sees it as putting basic science to work in solving the world’s problems. In this view, while the basic sciences enjoy considerable independence in pursuing research goals that come from the scientist’s own discipline and research interests, the ultimate research goals of applied science come from outside of science and the applied scientist can only choose which of those problems to work on and what means of solution to apply to them. • .
Revised from “The Vicissitudes of the Technological Neutrality Thesis in Agriculture,” a paper presented at the Sixth Biennial Meetings of the Society for Philosophy and Technology (1991) and published in a preliminary version in Pitt and Lugo 1991
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beus, Curtis E. and Riley E. Dunlap (1990). “Conventional versus Alternative Agriculture: The Paradigmatic Roots of the Debate.” Rural Sociology 55:590–616.
Busch, Lawrence and William B. Lacy (1983). Science, Agriculture, and the Politics of Research. Boulder: Westview.
Dickson, David (1974). The Politics of Alternative Technology. New York: Universe Books.
Doyle, Jack (1985). Altered Harvest. New York: Penguin.
Dundon, Stanislaus J. (1982). “Hidden Obstacles to Creativity in Agricultural Science.” pp. 836–869 in Haynes and Lanier (below).
Dundon, Stanislaus J. (1986). “The Moral Factor in Innovative Research.” pp. 39–51 in The Agricultural Scientific Enterprise, edited by L. Busch and W. Lacy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Haynes, Richard and Ray Lanier, eds. (1982). Agriculture, Change and Human Values: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Conference, 2 vols. Gainesville: Humanities and Agriculture Program, University of Florida.
Hill, S. B. (1979a). “Ecology, Ethics and Feelings.” Pp. 593–607 in The ReEvaluation of Existing Values and the Search for Absolute Values. New York: International Cultural Foundation.
Hill, S. B. (1979b). “Eco-agriculture: the Way Ahead?” Agrologist 8(4):9–11.
Horsfall, James G., et al. (1972). Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.
Jeffrey, Richard C. (1956). “Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses.” Philosophy of Science 23:237–46.
Johnson, Glenn L. (1986). Research Methodology for Economists: Philosophy and Practice. New York: Macmillan.
Johnson, Glenn L.(1990). “Ethical Dilemmas Posed by Recent and Prospective Developments with Respect to Agricultural Research.” Agriculture and Human Values 7(3–4, Summer-Fall):23–35.
Johnson, Glenn L. and Sylvan H. Wittwer (1984). “Agricultural Technology until 2030: Prospects, Priorities, and Policies.” East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Special Report #12.
Kunkel, H. O. (1988). “Issues of Academic Disciplines in Agricultural Research.” Agriculture and Human Values 5(4):16–25.
Levi, Isaac (1960). “Must the Scientist Make Value Judgments?” Journal of Philosophy 57(11).
Pitt, Joseph C. and Elena Lugo, eds. (1991). The Technology of Discovery and the Discovery of Technology. Blacksburg, VA: Society for Philosophy & Technology.
Rudner, Richard S. (1953). “The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.” Philosophy of Science 20:1–6.
Thompson, Paul (1995). “Technological Values in the Applied Science Laboratory.” This volume, pp. 137–149.
Shepard, Philip T. and Christopher Hamlin (1993). Deep Disagreement in U.S. Agriculture: Making Sense of Policy Conflict. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Stout, Bill Alvin, and C.A. Myers (1979). Energy for Agriculture, 7th ed. East Lansing, MI.
Stout, Bill Alvin with Jes Asmussen, et al. (1984). Energy Use and Management in Agriculture. North Scituate, MA: Breton.
U.S. Congress, House Committee on Agriculture (1980). Hearings before the Subcommittee on Department Investigations, Oversight and Research, Ninety-Sixth Congress, on H.R. 999, a Bill to Amend the Plant Variety Protection Act. Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O.
U.S. Congress, Senate (1980). Hearings on the Plant Variety Protection Act, June 17 and 18. Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and General Legislation. Washington D.C.: U.S.G.P.O.
Walters, Charles, Jr. (1975). The Case for Eco-Agriculture. Raytown, MO: Acres U.S.A.
Weaver, Richard M. (1970). “Humanism in an Age of Science and Technology.” Intercollegiate Review (ed. R. Hamlin) 1–2. Reprinted in Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, edited by Carl Mitcham and Robert Mackey. New York: The Free Press, 1972.
Winner, Langdon (1977). Autonomous Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Winner, Langdon (1981). “The Political Philosophy of Alternative Technology.” In Technology and Man’s Future (3rd or 4th ed.), edited by Albert H. Teich. New York: St. Martins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shepard, P.T. (1995). Technological Neutrality and the Changing Normative Context of Applied Science Research. In: Pitt, J.C. (eds) New Directions in the Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy and Technology, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8418-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8418-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4603-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8418-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive