Abstract
This paper presents the evidence for a rule of object shift in Middle and Early Modern English, and shows what the consequences of the existence of this rule are for (a) the English pronominal system, (b) the analysis of Scandinavian object shift, (c) the historical development of English. In Section 1 we present the basic facts about Scandinavian object shift, drawing on Holmberg (1986, 1991) and Vikner (1989, 1994). We sketch an analysis of this phenomenon which treats object shift as A-movement of the pronoun. This approach makes the right connection between object shift and verb movement in terms of the theory of locality in Chomsky (1993). Section 2 discusses Early Modern English and shows that, modulo independent differences concerning verb movement, object shift here exactly parallels MSc. Section 3 gives a more detailed version of the analysis. Here we also give several arguments against a head-movement approach to object shift.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnes, Michael: 1992, `Faroese Syntax — Achievements, Goals, Problems’, in Jonna Louis-Jensen and Milan Hendrik W. Poulsen (eds.), The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 7, Foroya FrOBskaparfelag, Tórshavn, pp. 17–37.
Chomsky, Noam: 1991, `Some Notes on Economy of Derivations and Representations’, in R. Friedin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridges, MA, pp. 417–454.
Chomsky, Noam: 1993, `A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View From Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.
Corver, Norbert and Henk van Riemsdijk: 1994, Scrambling, Foris/de Gruyter, Berlin.
Denison, David: 1985, `The Origins of Periphrastic Do: Ellegàrd and Visser Reconsidered’, in R. Eaton et al. (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, April 10–13, 1985, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 45–60.
Denison, David: 1993, English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions, Longmans, London.
Deprez, Vivienne: 1990, `Parameters of Object Movement’, talk given at the Scrambling Workshop, University of Tilburg, October 1990.
Dikken, den Marcel: 1990, `Particles and the Dative Alternation’, in Proceedings of the Second Leiden Conference for Junior Linguistics, pp. 71–86.
Ellegàrd, Alvar: 1953, The Auxiliary do: The Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English, edited by Fred Behre, Gothenburg Studies in English, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.
Emonds, Joe: 1976, A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving and Local Transformations, Academic Press, New York.
Emonds, Joe: 1978, `The Complex V—V’ in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 151–175.
Haegeman, Liliane: 1993, `Some Speculations on Argument Shift, Clitics and Crossing in West Flemish’, ms. University of Geneva, to appear in Studia Linguistica.
Holmberg Anders: 1986, Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages, Dept of General Linguistics, University of Stockholm.
Holmberg, Anders: 1989, `What is Wrong with SOV Word Order in SVO Language?’, ms. University of Uppsala.
Holmberg, Anders: 1991, `The Distribution of Scandinavian Weak Pronouns’, in Henk van Riemsdijk and Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Clitics and Their Hosts, EUROTYP Working Papers 8.1, European Science Foundation, Strasbourg, pp. 155–174.
Jespersen, Otto: 1990–49, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles,George Allen and Unwin, London.
Johnson, Kyle: 1991, `Object Positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 577636.
Jonas, Dianne and Jonathan Bobaljik: 1993, `Specs for Subjects’, in Jonathan Bobaljik and Colin Phillips (eds.), Papers on Case and Agreement I, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18, 59–98.
Josefsson, Gunlög: 1992, `Object Shift and Weak Pronominals in Swedish’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 49, 59–94.
Kayne, Richard: 1985, `Principles of Particle Constructions’, in Jacqueline Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer and Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Levels of Syntactic Representation, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 101–140.
Kayne, Richard: 1989, `Facets of Romance Past Participle Agreement’, in Paola Benincà (ed.), Dialect Variation on the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85–104.
Kayne, Richard: 1991, `Romance Clitics, Verb Movement and PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 648–686.
Kayne, Richard: 1993, `The Antisymmetry of Syntax’, ms. CUNY.
van Kemenade, Ans: 1987, Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English, Foris, Dordrecht.
Kroch, Anthony: 1989, `Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change’, Journal of Language Variation and Change 1, 199–244.
Lightfoot, David: 1979, Principles of Diachronic Syntax, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lightfoot, David: 1994, `Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement’, in Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause Structure and Language Change, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford, pp. 31–52.
Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1989, `Verb Movement, UG and the Structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.
Rizzi, Luigi: 1990, Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Roberts, Ian: 1983, `The Syntax of English Modals’, in Dan Flickinger et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford, pp. 227–246.
Roberts, Ian: 1985, `Agreement Parameters and the Development of English Modal Auxiliaries’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 21–58.
Roberts, Ian: 1991, `Excorporation and Minimality’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 209–218.
Roberts, Ian: 1992, Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Roberts, Ian: 1993, `Restructuring, Pronoun Movement and Head Movement in Old French’, ms. University of Wales.
Spevack, Michael: 1970, A Complete and Systematic Concordance to the Works of Shakespeare, Volume V: Hildings — Severing, Olms, Hildersheim.
Sportiche, D.: 1992, ‘Clitic Constructions’, ms. UCLA.
Vikner, Sten: 1988, `Modals in Danish and Event Expressions’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 39.
Vikner, Sten: 1989, `Object Shift and Double Objects in Danish’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44, 141–155.
Vikner, Sten: 1994, `Scandinavian Object Shift and West Germanic Scrambling’, in Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemdijk (eds.), Scrambling, Foris/de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 487–517.
Vikner, Sten: to appear, Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.
Vikner, Sten and Rex Sprouse: 1988, `Have/Be Selection as an A-Chain Membership Requirement’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 38.
Watanabe, Akira: 1993, `The Role of Triggers in the Extended Split INFL Hypothesis: Unlearnable Parameter Setting’, ms. University of Tokyo.
Zwicky, Arnold and Geoff Pullum: 1983, ‘Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n’t’, Language 59, 502–513.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, I. (1995). Object Movement and Verb Movement in Early Modern English. In: Haider, H., Olsen, S., Vikner, S. (eds) Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4505-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8416-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive