Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 31))

Abstract

In this article we discuss the anaphoric systems of four West-Germanic languages, focusing in particular on the properties of Frisian and German, as compared to English and Dutch. In line with the approach in Reinhart and Reuland (1993) it is argued that the binding conditions A and B govern the reflexive marking of predicates. In particular, condition B requires a reflexive predicate to be reflexive marked. A general definition of ‘being a reflexive marker’ is proposed, which includes the German stressed sich. The occurrence of bound pronouns versus simplex anaphors is governed by the chain condition, which requires that only the head of a chain be fully specified for grammatical features, including Case. It is shown that the differences in the distribution of bound pronouns in these languages follows from independent differences between their Case systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bach, Emmon and Barbara Partee: 1980, ‘Anaphora and Semantic Structure’, in J. Kreiman and A. Ojeda (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, Chicago Linguistic Society, The University of Chicago, Ill, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, Denis: 1984, On the Content of Empty Categories, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrall, William: 1974, View Point, Reflexives and the Nature of Noun Phrases, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1973, ‘Conditions on Transformations’, in Stephen Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 232–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1980, ‘On Binding’, Linguistics Inquiry 11, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986a, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986b, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1992, A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1, MITWPL, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everaert, Martin: 1986, The Syntax of Reflexivization, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everaert, Martin: 1990, ‘Nominative Anaphors in Icelandic: Morphology or Syntax?’, in Werner Abraham, Wim Kosmeijer and Eric J. Reuland (eds.), Issues in Germanic Syntax, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 277–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everaert, Martin: 1991, ‘Contextual Determination of the Anaphor/Pronominal Distinction’, in Jan Koster and Eric J. Reuland (eds.), Long Distance Anaphora, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 77–119.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Faltz, Leonard M.: 1977, Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax, doctoral diss., University of California at Berkeley, distributed by University Microfilm International, Ann Arbor, Mich. and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, Robert and Robert May: 1990, Anaphora and Ellipsis, Ms., CUNY and University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, Henry: 1965, Linguistics and English Grammar, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik and Robert May: 1991, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellan, Lars: 1988, Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellan, Lars: 1991, ‘Containment and Connectedness Anaphors’, in Jan Koster and Eric J. Reuland (eds.), Long Distance Anaphora, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 27–49.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hestvik, Arild: 1990, TF-movement of Pronouns and the Computation of Binding Domains’, doctoral diss., Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestvik, Arild: 1991, ‘Subjectless Binding Domains’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9.3, 455–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestvik, Arild: 1992, TF-Movement of Pronouns and Antisubject Orientation’, Linguistic Inquiry 23.4, 557–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Jarich: 1991, ‘Pronouns and Case: On the Distribution of harr(en) and se in Frisian’, ms. Fryske Akademy, Ljouwert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Teun and Ian Roberts: 1993, ‘Middle Constructions in Dutch and English’, in Eric J. Reuland and Werner Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and Language: Lexical and Conceptual Structure, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 183–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto: 1933/1983, Essentials of English Grammar,Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward: 1988, ‘On Semantics and the Binding Theory’, in John Hawkins (ed.), Explaining Language Universals, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R.E.: 1961, German Dialects: Phonology and Morphology, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R.E.: 1978, The German Language, Faber and Faber, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan: 1985, ‘Reflexives in Dutch’, in Jacqueline Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer and Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Grammatical Representation, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 141–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan and Eric Reuland (eds.): 1991, Long Distance Anaphora, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard: 1976, Howard: 1976, ‘Remark on Coreference’, Linguistic Analysis 2, 1–22 [Reprinted in Lasnik 1989 ].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard: 1981, ‘On Two Recent Treatments of Disjoint Reference’, Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 48–58 [Reprinted in Lasnik 1989].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard: 1989, Essay on Anaphora, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, David: 1983, ‘A Distributional Difference Between Reciprocals and Reflexives’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 723–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouhalla, Jamal: 1991, ‘Functional Categories and the Head Parameter’, paper presented at GLOW 1991, abstract in GLOW Newsletter 26, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica, Pierre: 1985, ‘Subject, Tense and Truth: Towards a Modular Approach to Binding’, in Jacqueline Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer and Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Grammatical Representation, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 259–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica, Pierre: 1987, ‘On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle’, Proceedings of NELS 17, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 483–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul: 1970, ‘On So-called Pronouns in English’, in R.A. Jacobs and P.S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn and Co., Waltham, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya and Eric J. Reuland: 1989, ‘Anaphoric Territories. Ms., Tel Aviv University and Groningen University’, in Werner Abraham (ed.), Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 34, 1991, Groningen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya and Reuland, Eric: 1991, ‘Anaphors and Logophors: An Argument Structure Perspective’, in Jan Koster and Eric J. Reuland (eds.), Long Distance Anaphora, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 283–321.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland: 1993, ‘Reflexivity’, Linguistic Inquiry 24.4, 657–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuland, Eric: 1981, `On Extraposition of Complement Clauses’, Proceedings of NELS XI, GLSA, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuland, Eric and Tanya Reinhart: 1992, ‘Binding Conditions and Chains’, in D. Bates (ed.), The Proceedings of the Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford Linguistics Association, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Leland Stanford Junior University, Stanford, pp. 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riad, Tomas: 1988, ‘Reflexivity and Predication’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1990, Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John Robert: 1970, ‘On Declarative Sentences’, in R. Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn and Co, Waltham, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saddy, Doug: 1987, ‘On the Notion Maximal Projection’, in Joyce McDonough and Bernadette Plunkett (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, pp. 539–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurösson, Halldór ekrmann: 1991, ‘Icelandic Case Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9.2, 327–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigriöur: 1992, Binding in Icelandic: Evidence from Language Acquisition, doctoral diss., UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truckenbrodt, Hubert: 1992, ‘Clitics and the Chain Condition’, unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikner, Sten: 1985, ‘Parameters of Binder and Binding Category in Danish’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyngaerd Vanden, Guido: 1989, ‘Object Shift as an A-movement Rule’, in P. Branigan, J. Gaulding, M. Kubo and K. Murasugi (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics Vol. 11, MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp. 256–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zribi-Hertz, Anne: 1989, ‘A-type Binding and Narrative Point of View’, Language 65.4, 695–727.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reuland, E., Reinhart, T. (1995). Pronouns, Anaphors and Case. In: Haider, H., Olsen, S., Vikner, S. (eds) Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4505-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8416-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics