Skip to main content

Complex Predicates in Dutch and English

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 31))

Abstract

Binary branching allows two analyses for strings of three elements: left-branching and right-branching. Dutch VPs consisting of an DP-object, a nonverbal predicate and a verb are usually taken to be left-branching: the DP and the nonverbal predicate form a small clause (SC) complement. I will argue for an alternative analysis in which such strings are right-branching: the VP is headed by a complex predicate (CPr) consisting of the nonverbal predicate and the verb. Following the argumentation for CPrs in Dutch, I will consider the consequences of the CPr analysis for English.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, Mark: 1988, Incorporation; A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, Jill and Janet Randall: 1992, `The Argument Structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 173–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1955, The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, ms., MIT, Plenum Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1977, `On WH-Movement’, in P. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1991, `Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 417–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1993, `A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, in K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane and Arnim Mester: 1988, `Light Verbs and Theta-Marking’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 205–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack: 1991, `Complex Predicates and Liberation in Dutch and English’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 661–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Teun: 1984, Transitivity. Grammatical Relations in GB-Theory, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Teun: 1986, `Deverbalization and Inheritance’, Linguistics 24, 549–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Teun: 1988, `Small Clause Results’, Lingua 74, 101–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1977, X-Bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1984, Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1991, `Romance Clitics, Verb Movement and PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 647–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan: 1978, Locality Principles in Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan: 1992, `Scrambling’, talk given at Groningen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, Susumo: 1973, `Constraints on Internal Clauses and Sentential Subjects’, Linguistic Inquiry 4, 368–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longobardi, Giuseppe: 1985, The Theoretical Status of the Adjunct Condition’, ms., Scola Normale, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, Ad: 1994a, Complex Predicates, Ph.D. Diss., Utrecht University/OTS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, Ad: 1994b, `Scrambling as a D-structure Phenomenon’, in N. Corver and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Studies on Scrambling; Movement and Non-Movement Approaches to Free Word-Order Phenomena, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, Ad and Fred Weerman: 1993, `The Balance between Syntax and Morphology:

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutch Particles and Resultatives’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11 433–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1982, Paths and Categories, Ph.D. Diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemsdijk, Henk van: 1978, A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness. The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases in Dutch, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemsdijk, Henk van: 1989, `Movement and Regeneration’, in P. Benincà (ed.), Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar; Proceedings of the GLOW Workshop in Venice, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 105–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth: 1982, The Syntax of Words, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, Arie and Johan Kerstens: 1978, `Over verklaren in de taalkunde’, in P. van der Putte and H. Verkuyl (eds.), Nieuwe tegenstellingen op het Nederlands taalgebied, Ruygh-bewerp VIII, Utrecht University, pp. 130–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerman, Fred: 1989, The V2 Conspiracy; A Syntactic and A Diachronic Analysis, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, Ken and Peter Culicover: 1980, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1989, `The Anaphoric Nature of 0-Roles’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 425–456.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neeleman, A. (1995). Complex Predicates in Dutch and English. In: Haider, H., Olsen, S., Vikner, S. (eds) Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4505-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8416-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics