Abstract
I begin, once again, autobiographically. Before and even for a while after I met Karl Mannheim, I thought of myself as a poet; in fact, it was more a practical consideration that made me obtain an academic degree after leaving Germany, and I came to be identified as a sociologist (at least of sorts) only in the United States. Before 1933, when I went to Italy, and during the first years there, I also wrote some speculative essays that would be classified as philosophical and that show a continuity with the much later ideas on surrender which surprised (and pleased) me as I reread them, after decades before they were finally published1 But even in Italy, where I taught in boarding schools whatever was demanded (except for the one year of study and writing my dissertation — on the sociology of knowledge!), I hardly paid attention to the question of what profession I should pursue; then, too, I thought of myself above all as a poet. As I look back at those last years in Germany and the years in Italy, more than half a century ago, I feel, probably distorted by longing, as if I then was in a continuous state of surrender: love, music, poetry, nature. The single person who for a few years before I went away inspired and supported me most in my writing efforts was himself a poet, and like Karl Wolfskehl,2 a fellow Darmstädter: Hans Schiebelhuth. Both his and Wolfskehl’s photographs have hung over my desk, at which I am typing these words, for decades.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Along with writing of other genres, including poetry, in Das Unumgängliche: Gedichte, Prosa, Theater, Essays (Darmstadt: Gesellschaft Hessischer Literaturfreunde, 1988), pp. 118–149. See also Chap. I above.
Cf. Chap. I above.
Cf. Chap. V, Sec. 8, and Looking Backward and Forward (4), above.
CE. Surrender-and-Catch and Sociology, in The Renascense of Sociological Theory (See Chap. VI, n.2), p. 208, and SC,esp. Part One.
J.P. Ward, Poetry and the Sociological Idea ( Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1981 ).
Albert Salomon, “Prophets, Priests, and Social Scientists” (1949), in In Praise of Enlightenment (Cleveland and New York: Meridian Books [World], 1963), pp. 387398. Cf. Kurt H. Wolff, “Sociology and Meaning,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 19, 3 (1993): 287–292.
Cf. Chap. V, Sec 1, above.
Ward, op. cit.,p. 10.
Wolff, Vorgang (1935), in Vorgang and immerwährende Revolution ( Wiesbaden: Heymann, 1978 ).
SC,p. 180.
Ibid.,Chap. 2.
Ibid.,p. 184.
Ibid.,p. 185.
Ibid.,p. 13.
Hannah Arendt, letter to Kurt H. Wolff, 8 April 1957, in Wolff, Vorgang,p. 50.
Vorgang,p. 46.
Cf. Hans-Georg Gadamer, e.g., Truth and Method (1960), trans. Garrett Barden and John Cumming (New York: Continuum, 1975); Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. David E. Linge ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976 ).
Cf. Chap. III, Sec. 8, above, and SC, pp. 58, 79.
Cf. SC,p. 24.
Ibib.
See end of Sec. 3 above.
See beginning of Sec. 4 above.
SC,p. 21.
SC,p. 52.
SC,p. 96.
Cf. Sec. 2 above.
Cf. Sec 4 above and Wolff, “Surrender-and-Catch and Phenomenology,” Human Studies,7, 2 (1984), esp. 196–204, and Chap. VIII below.
Cf. SC,pp. 126–132.
Georg Simmel, “The Transcendental Character of Life” (1918), trans. Donald N. Levine, in Levine, ed., On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings [by Georg Simmel], (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), pp. 368–369, 370, 365 (translation slightly modified).
SC,consult Index under “gatheredness.”
Ward, Poetry and the Sociological Idea,pp. 144–145.
32. SC,Chap 2.
SC,Chap. 18.
Alfred Schutz, “On Multiple Realities,” pp. 245–259; Wolff, “Surrender-and-Catch and Phenomenology,” 202–203, and Chap. VIII, below.
Ward, Poetry and the Sociological Idea,p. 171.
36. SC,p. 217.
Cf. Looking Forward and Backward (1).
SC,p. 25.
Cf. SC,Chap. 15.
F.R. Leavis in 1932, quoted in Ward, Poetry and the Sociological Idea,p. 8.
Cf. Chap. V, Sec. 3, above.
Cf. Chap. V, end, and Looking Backward and Forward (4).
Wolff, Trying Sociology,pp. 450–451.
Karl Mannheim, “The Ideological and the Sociological Interpretation of Intellectual Phenomena,” in From Karl Mannheim,1971, pp. 116–131; 1993, pp. 244–252.
I well remember that when I first ventured ideas about surrender (in the early 1950s), my friend David Bakan, a most knowledgeable and sensitive thinker, voiced pessimism about the possibility or at least likelihood of surrender today and thus of the chances of successfully conveying its idea.
Ward, Poetry and the Sociological Idea,p. 16.
Ibid.,p. 205. Cf. the quotation from Simmel and comment in Sec. 5 above.
Cf. Chap. IX below.
Liliane Frey-Rohn, “Evil from the Psychological Point of View,” in The Curatorium of the C.G. Jung Institute Zurich, ed., Evil ( Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967 ), p. 193.
50. Hymn to Beauty,from Les Fleurs du Mal. In English prose, which if read back into French, may just possibly resuscitate its corpse: Do you come out of high heaven or emerge from the abyss, O beauty? Your glance, hellish and divine, Sheds confusedly benefits and crime… Do you rise from the black pit or come down from the stars?… You randomly sow joy and disasters, And you govern all and are responsible to nothing… Of course, the worst feature of such prosaicness of “translation” is that the rigorous and severe classical form of the poem, thus its devilish mastery, is entirely lost.
Paul Zweig, Review of Baudelaire, The Flowers of Evil, trans. Richard Howard (Boston: Godine, 1982), New York Times Book Review, 25 July 1982.
Cf. “`Surrender-and-Catch’ and Sociology,” in The Renascence of Sociological Theory (see Chap. VI, n.2), pp. 207–208.
Cf. Chap. VI, Sec. 3B, above.
SC,p. 94.
See Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method,esp. pp. 274–278.
Chapter VII through part of the last section is based on “Exploring Relations between Surrender-and-Catch and Poetry, Sociology, Evil,” Human Studies,9, 4 (1986): 347364.
The last pages of the last section (10) of Chapter VII make use of “Surrender to Morality as the Morality of Surrender,” in Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka and Calvin
O. Schrag, eds., Foundations of Morality, Human Rights, and the Human Sciences (Analecta Husserliana, XV),(Dordrecht, Boston, London: D. Reidel, 1983), pp. 495499.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wolff, K.H. (1995). Surrender-and-Catch, Poetry, Sociology, Morality. In: Transformation in the Writing. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 166. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8412-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8412-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4478-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8412-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive