Skip to main content

The Philosophical Framework of Sartre’s Theory of the Theater

  • Chapter
The Prism of the Self

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 19))

  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

Both in his life and in his thought Jean-Paul Sartre was frequently theatrical, as exaggerated as his prose. He really believed that “the chief source of great tragedy is human freedom.” In this spirit he rewrote several ancient myths and was not at all bothered by the ironic incongruity of asserting that “Oedipus is free; Antigone and Prometheus are free. The fate we think we find in ancient drama is only the other side of freedom. Passions themselves are freedom caught in their own trap.”1 Sartre’s continual invocation of freedom and his own experience of being free pervade all his writings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jean-Paul Sartre, Sartre on Theater (New York: Random House, 1976), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Konstantin Stanislavski, My Life in Art, (New York: Meridian, 1956), 466.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness, trans. Hazel Barnes (New York: Philosophical Library, 1956), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., 39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See James M. Edie, “Sartre as Phenomenologist and as Existential Psychoanalyst,” Phenomenology and Existentialism, ed. Lee and Mandelbaum (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967), 139–178, and Edie, “The Question of the Transcendental Ego: Sartre’s Critique of Husserl,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol. 24, no. 2 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jean-Paul Sartre, The Psychology of the Imagination (New York: Philosophical Books, 1948), 273. Translation corrected.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iris Murdoch, Sartre: Romantic Rationalist (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959), 42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frederick A. Olafson, Principles and Persons (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1967), 19ff, gives a good historical disquisition on “medieval Franciscan voluntarism” and shows its affinity with Sartre’s theory of freedom.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jean-Paul Sartre, L’Existentialisme est un humanisme (Paris: Nagel, 1957), 84ff.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jean-Paul Sartre, Saint Genet: Actor and Martyr, trans. Bernard Frechtman (New York: Braziller, 1963). This is certainly the most successful of Sartre’s attempts at the existential psychoanalysis of a particular life’s project and it apparently hit home. Genet said that reading the book filled him with “a kind of disgust because I saw myself stripped naked.” He needed six years to get over the analysis, during which time he ceased writing; when he did begin again it was not to continue with the short novels and short stories or the early one act plays of the kind Sartre had studied (along with other evidence), but to write a new kind of theater, much more symbolic, much larger in scope and in a completely new style. So it seems that Sartre’s subject, in this case, recognized himself in the analysis, which is certainly not to say it “cured” him of anything. Both Sartre and he would have scoffed at such a suggestion. See James Edie, “Sartre as Existentialist and as Existential Psychoanalyst,” op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bertolt Brecht, “On Experimental Theater,” in Theater in the Twentieth Century, ed. Robert W. Corrigan (New York: Grove Press, 1963), 107.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., 96ff.

    Google Scholar 

  13. This is presented in Centeno y Rilova and D. Sutherland, The Blue Clown, Dialogues, (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1971). Though I take these dialogues as my inspiration for applying these distinctions to Sartre’s work, I have considerably “interpreted” Centeno’s original presentation.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlin Barton, The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), 60ff.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Francis Jeanson, Sartre par lui-méme, (Paris: Seuil, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edie, J.M. (1995). The Philosophical Framework of Sartre’s Theory of the Theater. In: Crowell, S.G. (eds) The Prism of the Self. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8408-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8408-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4570-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8408-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics