Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 252))

Abstract

The aim of this Chapter is to introduce the basic semantic tools which will be used in our further considerations. The semantics which we are going to present is basically a version of model-theoretical semantics; some new concepts are introduced for the purposes of erotetic analysis. The semantic concepts defined below pertain to any of the formalized languages for which we defined in Chapter 3 the concept of question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf., e.g., Wójcicki (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The paper Wiśniewski (1987) is an abstract of the paper presented at the VIII International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Moscow 1987. For some mysterious reasons the organizers retyped the manuscript before printing without making any proof reading. As a result this paper presumably wins the world record for misprints.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Belnap & Steel (1976), p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  4. In Belnap’s terminology a prospective presupposition is a d-wff which expresses the presupposition of the question.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buszkowski, who in fact introduced this concept (cf. Buszkowski, 1989), uses here the term correct question.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The definition proposed above is similar to that given by Popper (cf. Popper, 1959, p. 120), who, however, uses the concept of derivability.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A similar idea was suggested by Belnap (cf. Belnap, 1963, Chapter 7.7, or Belnap & Steel, 1976, p. 73). Belnap, however, does not apply it in his general considerations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wiśniewski, A. (1995). Semantics. In: The Posing of Questions. Synthese Library, vol 252. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8406-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8406-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4595-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8406-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics