Abstract
Two things have obscured an understanding of Hegelian philosophy more than anything else. One is the claim that Hegel’s dialectic constitutes a violation of the laws of contradiction and excluded middle; the other is the verdict that Hegel is fundamentally a metaphysician. Klaus Hartmann has argued succinctly and convincingly that the dialectic is to be viewed as a procedure for the systematic construal and concatenation of categorial concepts, for which the principle of avoiding contradiction is absolutely essential ([4], p. 229; [5], p. 7). Above all, however, he was the first to have demonstrated that not only is a non-metaphysical reading of Hegel possible but that it makes more sense of, and is more consonant with, the spirit of Hegel’s writings than a metaphysical interpretation.1 According to this view, Hegelian theory is primarily a reconstructive hermeneutics of categorial concepts, i.e., an ontology ([6], p. 40f). Its greatest merits consist in the rationality of its procedure and its power to make thought intelligible to itself. The following may be seen, among other things, as a corroboration of this view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bennett, J.: 1974, Kant’s Dialectic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hartmann, K.: 1972, `The “Analogies” and After’, in L.W. Beck (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 47–62.
Hartmann, K.: 1972, `Hegel: A Non-Metaphysical View’, in A. Maclntyre (ed.), Hegel. A Collection of Critical Essays, Anchor Books, New York, pp. 101–124.
Hartmann, K.: 1973, `Zur Neusten Dialektik — Kritik’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 55, pp. 220–242.
Hartmann, K.: 1976, `Die ontologische Option’, in K. Hartmann (ed.), Die ontologische Option, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 1–30.
Hartmann, K.: 1984, `Transzendentale Argumentation. Eine Abwägung der verschiedenen Ansätze’, in E. Schaper and W. Vossenkuhl (eds.), Bedingungen der Möglichkeit, “Transcendental Arguments” und transzendentales Denken, Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, pp. 17–41.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1959, Enzyklopaedie der philosophischen Wissenschaften, F. Nicolin and O. Poeggeler, Felix Meiner, Hamburg.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1965, Sämtliche Werke, H. Glockner (ed.), Bad Canstatt, Stuttgart.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1969, Hegel’s Science of Logic,A.V. Miller (tr.), Allen and Unwin, London.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1975, Hegel’s Logic, W. Wallace (tr. ), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1978, Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit, vol. 3, M.J. Petry (ed. and tr.), Reidel, Dordrecht — Boston.
Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time, J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson (trs.), Harper and Row, New York.
Horstmann, R.-P.: 1984, Ontologie und Relationen. Hegel, Bradley, Russell und die Kontroverse über interne und externe Beziehungen, Athenaeum-Main, Königstein/Ts.
Kant, I.: 1933, Critique of Pure Reason, N.K. Smith (tr. ), Macmillan, London.
Kant, I.: 1950, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, L.W. Beck (ed. and tr.), BobbsMerrill, Indianapolis.
Locke, J.: 1961, Essay, J.W. Yolton (ed.), Dent, Everyman’s Library, London.
Schelling, F.W.J.: 1966, Ausgewählte Werke, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brinkmann, K. (1994). Hegel’s Critique of Kant and Pre-Kantian Metaphysics. In: Engelhardt, H.T., Pinkard, T. (eds) Hegel Reconsidered. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8378-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8378-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4349-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8378-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive