Abstract
The modest aim of this discussion of Hegel’s metaphysics is to indicate what the view is and to say something about its interest today. It has been claimed that metaphysics is the main problem in comprehending and evaluating Hegel’s theory ([3], p. 3). Yet it has been widely rumored for some time that, if not philosophy, at least metaphysics has now come to the end, or perhaps even the end of the end, which is not to be confused with a new beginning. Certainly, metaphysics has lately been an unpopular theme. In our time, numerous writers from all sides of the discussion have suggested that metaphysics cannot be defended. So it is important to take stock, at least as concerns Hegel, of where things stand, in particular to determine whether, since Hegel is obviously committed to metaphysics, it makes sense to defend anything like a Hegelian view of metaphysics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Ayer, A.J.: n.d., Language, Truth and Logic, Dover, New York.
Beiser, F.C.: 1987, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Beiser, F.C.: 1993, `Hegel and the Problem of Metaphysics’, in F.C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 270–300.
Derrida, J.: 1967, De la Grammatologie, Editions de Minuit, Paris.
Derrida, J.: 1967, La Voix et le phénomène, Presses universitaires de France, Paris.
Derrida, J.: 1981, Glas, Denoel/Gonthier, Paris.
Ewing, A.C.: 1967, A Short Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Groos, K.: 1901, `Hat Kant Hume’s Treatise gelesen?’, Kant-Studien, 177–181.
Habermas, J.: 1987, `Metaphysik nach Kant’, in Cramer et al. (eds.), Theorie der Subjektivität. Festschrift für Dieter Henrich, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., pp. 425–443.
Hartmann, K.: 1972, `Hegel: A Non-Metaphysical View’, in A. Maclntyre (ed.), Hegel. A Collection of Critical Essays, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y., pp. 101–24.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1970, G.W.F. Hegel. Werke in zwanzig Bänden, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt a.M.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1977, Difference Between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy, H.S. Harris and W. Cerf (trans. ), SUNY Press, Albany.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1977, Phenomenology of Spirit, A. V. Miller (trans.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time, J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson (trans.), Harper and Row, Evanston.
Heidegger, M.: 1977, On Time and Being, J. Stambaugh (trans.), Harper and Row, New York.
Heidegger, M.: 1981, Nietzsche, Neske, Pfullingen.
Heidegger, M.: 1982, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, A. Hofstadter (trans.), Indiana University Press, Indiana.
Henrich, D.: 1987, `Was ist Metaphysik — was Moderne? Zwölf Thesen gegen Jürgen Habermas’, in Konzepte. Essays zur Philosophie in der Zeit, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt a.M.
Hume, D.: 1955, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, C.W. Hendel (ed.), LLA, Indianapolis.
Kant, I.: 1950, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, L.W. Beck (trans.), LLA, Indianapolis.
Kant, I.: 1961, Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, N.K. Smith (trans. ), Macmillan, London.
Kant, I.: 1985, `Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’, in J.W. Ellington (trans.), Philosophy of Material Nature, Hackett, Indianapolis, pp. 3–134.
Koerner, S.: 1970, Categorial Frameworks, Blackwell, Oxford.
Marx, K.: 1973, Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, M. Nicolaus (trans.), Penguin, Baltimore.
Popper, K.: 1965, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Harper and Row, New York.
Putnam, H.: 1990, Realism with a Human Face, J. Conant (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Rockmore, T.: 1986, Hegel’s Circular Epistemology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and London.
Rosenkranz, K.: 1846, `Die Metaphysik in Deutschland seit 1831’ in Jahrbuch für spekulative Philosophie.
Taylor, R.: 1963, Metaphysics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Vollrath, E.: 1969, Die These der Metaphysik. Zur Gestalt der Metaphysik bei Aristoteles, Kant und Hegel, Alois Henn Verlag, Wuppertal/Ratingen.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rockmore, T. (1994). Hegel’s Metaphysics, or the Categorial Approach to Knowledge of Experience. In: Engelhardt, H.T., Pinkard, T. (eds) Hegel Reconsidered. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8378-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8378-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4349-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8378-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive