Abstract
In the previous two chapters, we covered problems related to the physical notion of time in (i) philosophy and (ii) Newtonian mechanics. Our contention is that a theoretical analysis of the concept of time in Newtonian theory is and was of greater relevance than the Michelson-Morley experiment in understanding the special theory of relativity. Here we argue in support of the latter part of the contention. The Michelson-Morley experiment, though relevant, was not intended to test the constancy of the speed of light. Rather, the experiment attempted to distinguish between the theories of Fresnel and Stokes, both of which used the aether hypothesis. Michelson concluded that the Stokes theory was valid, while Miller was awarded a prize for his claim to have detected an aether drift, which was widely disbelieved.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
H. A. Lorentz et al, The Principle of Relativity, Dover, 1952.
E. T. Whittaker, [ 1910 ], History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity Vol. I: The Classical Theories, Thomas Nelson and Sons, London, 1951.
J. C. Maxwell [1879], Nature, 29 Jan 1880, 315.
A. Fresnel, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 9, 57–66 (1818).
G. G. Stokes, Philosophical Magazine, 27, 9–15 (1845); 28, 76–81 (1846).
A. A. Michelson, Amer. J. Sci., 22, 120–9 (1881).
Jonathan Powers, Philosophy and the New Physics, Methuen, London, 1987.
A. A. Michelson and E. W. Morley, Philosophical Magazine, S.5, 24, 449–63 (1887), Amer. J. Sci. 3, 333–45 (1887); E. W. Morley and D. C. Miller, Philosophical Magazine S.6, 8, 753–4 (1904); Phil.Mag. 680–5 (1905) and Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci., 41, 321–7 (1905); D. C. Miller, Rev. Mod. Phys., 5, 203–42 (1933); see also Phys. Rev., 19 (4), 407–8 (1922).
Conference on the Michelson-Morley Experiments held at Mount Wilson Observatory, Pasadena, California, Feb. 4 and 5 1927, Ap.J., 68 (5), 341–402 (1928).
R. S. Shanidand, S. W. McCuskey, F. C. Leone, and G. Kuerti, Rev. Mod. Phys., 27, 167 (1955); J.L. Synge, The Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society, 26, 45–54 (1952–4).
W. Kaufmann, Ann. der Phys., 19, 487 (1906).
A. Pais, ‘Subtle is the Lord…’ ( Oxford: Univ. Press, 1982 ).
J. L. Synge, Relativity: the Special Theory, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1956, p 161–2.
Ref. 7.
R.S. Shankland, Amer. J. Phys., 31, 47 (1962);32, 16 (1964); 41, 895 (1973)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raju, C.K. (1994). The Michelson-Morley Experiment. In: Time: Towards a Consistent Theory. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8376-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8376-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4462-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8376-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive