Advertisement

Cosmological Time

  • C. K. Raju
Part of the Fundamental Theories of Physics book series (FTPH, volume 65)

Abstract

Our objective is to formulate questions about time in their true setting — cosmology. Even to formulate these questions one needs a theory. But, for cosmology, the available theories are unsatisfactory and the slender empirical evidence admits a diversity of interpretations.

We review the evidence for an expanding, finite-age cosmos, using general relativity and in relation to questions about the global structure of time. In interpreting the evidence we emphasize the implicit assumptions, which often go unstated.

We conclude by formulating a number of questions about time. Is there a proper clock? What is the exact relationship between the time asymmetries? Is time asymmetry imperfect? Could it be local? Is the notion of an asymmetry conceptually adequate to capture a sufficient variety of structures of time?

Keywords

Dark Matter Cosmological Time Closed Timelike Curve Time Asymmetry Foucault Pendulum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    D.W. Sciama, In: Early Evolution of the Universe and Its Present Structure, G.O. Abell and G. Chincarini (eds), IAU, 1983, pp 493–506.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    This paradox has a long history, dating back to centuries before Olbers. See, e.g. E. R. Harrison, Darkness at Night: A Riddle of the Universe (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1987 ). The name Olbers’ paradox seems to have been popularised by H. Bondi in his classic text on Cosmology, 2nd ed. ( Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1960 ).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. R. Harrison, in: Proc. JAU No. 139, Galactic and Extragalactic Background Radiation, S. Bowyer and Ch. Lienert (eds), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989, pp 3–17.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.C.W. Davies, The Physics of Time Asymmetry, Univ. of Surrey Press, London, 1974; H. Bondi and T. Gold, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 108, 252 (1948).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    For a clear exposition of the general relativistic redshift, see J.L. Synge, Relativity, the General Theory (Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1966 ). Briefly, every redshift, including the gravitational redshift, may be regarded as a Doppler shift.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. de Sitter, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 78, 3 (1917).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    One has to distinguish between an emission and absorption redshift. Both tend to be similar, though not identical. This is strange because one would expect the absorption redshift, due to absorption by intergalactic dust, to have a range of values all the way up to the emission redshift.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Arp, personal communication (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. K. Sachs and A. M. Wolfe, ‘Perturbations of model and angular variations of the microwave background’, Ap. J., 147, 73–90 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.R. Stoeger, G.F.R. Ellis and B.G. Schmidt, ‘Gauge-invariant variation in the redshift and cosmic background radiation anisotropies’, Gen.Rel. Gray., 23, 1169–94 (1991).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A 15±4µK (5 ppm) anisotropy in the CMBR was detected by COBE (Cosmic Background Explorer). G. I. Smoot, C.L. Bennett, A. Kogut et al, Ap. J., 316, Ll (1992). For the interpretation of this anisotropy as favouring cold dark matter, see C.L. Bennett et al, Ap.J., 316, L7 (1992); R.L. Davis, H.M. Hodges, G.I. Smoot et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 1856 (1992).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The surface r = 2m has area 4orr2, but has infinite volume; curvature coordinates may not be used while going across the surface r = 2m.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. W. Hawking and G.F.R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime (Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1974, 1987 ) pp 286–7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.D. Lax, Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws,American Mathematical Society Publications, Providence, Rhode Island, 1973. The example is that of the flow of a compressible fluid in a tube with the piston being pushed out with constant acceleration. This now-standard example may also be found in, e.g., R. D. Richtmyer, Principles of Advanced Mathematical Physics,Vol. I, Springer, Berlin, 1978, pp 388–90. The situation in GRT is analogous: a collapse, once initiated, must continuously accelerate, leading to a finite-time ‘blow up’ of smooth solutions.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    For a review of the techniques and pitfalls here, see C. K. Raju, ‘Distributional matter tensors in relativity’, Proceedings of the Fifth Marcel Grossman Meeting, D.G. Blair et al eds, Wiley Eastern, Singapore, 1989) p 421. The background may be found in J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 15, 381–96 (1982); 15, 1785–97 (1982).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vera C. Rubin, ‘What is the matter in spiral galaxies?’ In: Large-Scale Structure of the Universe, V. C. Rubin and G.V. Coyne (eds) ( Princeton: Univ. Press, 1980 ).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Gödel, Rev. Mod. Phys., 21, 447–50 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Chandrasekhar, in: The Nature of Time, (ed) T. Gold, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 1967, pp 68–74.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cited by S. Chandrasekhar, Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    As already noted by Gödel, on the speculation that galaxies may have formed due to inhomogeneities resulting from rotation, it is not essential that the axes of rotation should be preferentially oriented like those of the planets.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. K. Raju
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Advanced StudyRashtrapati NivasShimlaIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Development of Advanced ComputingNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations