Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

EC Regional Policy and the Evolution of the Structural Funds

  • Chapter
Book cover The Construction of Europe

Abstract

It might be expected that the reliance on the market system upon which the European Community is based would allow little scope for implementation of regional policy. In a strict market system, economic advantages or disadvantages resulting from geographical factors and natural resource endowments would be regarded as given, factors upon which private competition and public policy were to be based, not as targets for policy action. Consistent with this viewpoint is the argument thatl

the provisions of the [EC] Treaty forbidding discrimination are concerned with discrimination artificially brought about by measures taken by Governments or other persons in positions of power. Those provisions are not designed to suppress competitive advantages enjoyed by particular undertakings owing to their geographical location or other natural factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Advocate General Warner in Case 52/79, Procureur du Roi v. Debauve [19801 ECR 833 at 869.

    Google Scholar 

  2. EC Commission, Guide to the Reform of the Community ‘s Structural Funds (Brussels-Luxembourg 1989), pp. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, generally, T. Heller and J. Pelkmans, “The Federal Economy: Law and Economic Integration and the Positive State-The U.S.A. and Europe Compared in an Economic Perspective” in M. Cappelletti et al. (eds.), Integration Through Law (Berlin 1986), Vol. 1, 245–412, p. 320. As regards EC constraints on State aid, see A. Evans and S. Martin, “Socially Acceptable Distortion of Competition: EC Policy on State Aid,” (1991) European Law Review 79–111.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See D. Collins, The Operation of the European Social Fund. (London, 1983) or EC Commission, Directorate—General for Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, “The European Social Fund,” Social Europe 2/91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rapport des Chefs de Délégation aux Ministres des Affaires Etrangres, Comité Intergouvermental créé par la Conférence de Messine, Bruxelles, 21 avril 1956, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Article 1, Council Decision 71/66/EEC of 1 February 1971 (JO 1971, L 28/15) on the reform of the European Social Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Council Decision 72/428 of 19 December 1972 (JO 1972 L291/158) on assistance from the European Social Fund for persons leaving agriculture to pursue non—agricultural activities.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Council Decision 76/206 of 9 February 1976 (OJ 1976 L39/39) on intervention by the European Social Fund in favour of persons occupied in the textile and clothing industries. See also Council Decision 72/429 of 19 December 1972 (JO 1972 L291/160) on intervention by the European Social Fund in favour of persons occupied in the textile industry.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Council Decision 74/327 of 27 June 1974 (OJ 1974 L185/20) on action by the European Social Fund for migrant workers; Council Decision 77/803/EEC of 20 December 1977 on action by the European Social Fund for migrant workers (OJ 1977 L 337/12).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Council Decision 75/459 of 22 July 1975 (OJ 1975 L199/36) on action by the European Social Fund for persons affected by employment difficulties. See later Council Regulation 3039/78 of 18 December 1978 (OJ 1978 L361/3) on the creation of two new types of aid for young people from the European Social Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Council Decision 77/704 of 20 December 1977 (OJ 1977 L337/14) on action by the European Social Fund for women.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Regulation 2396/71 of the Council of 8 November 1971 (JO 1971 L244/54) implementing the Council Decision of 1 February 1971 on the reform of the European Social Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Regulation 2397/71 of the Council of 8 November 1971 (JO 1971 L249/58) on aid which may qualify for assistance from the European Social Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Council Regulation 2895/77 of 20 December 1977 (OJ 1977 L337/7) concerning operations qualifying for a higher rate of intervention by the European Social Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Council Decision 83/516 of 17 October 1983 (OJ 1983 L289/38) on the tasks of the European Social Fund, Article 1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See also Council Decision 85/568 of 20 December 1985 (OJ 1985 L 370/40) amending, on account of the accession of Spain and Portugal, Decision 83/516 on the tasks of the European Social Fund and Commission Decisions 83/673 (OJ L 377/1), 85/261 (OJ L 133/26) and 87/329 (OJ L 167/56) on guidelines for management of the ESF.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Harr, “Thirty years of ESF assistance,” EC Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, “The European Social Fund,” Social Europe 2/91, p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Council Regulation 17/64 of 5 February 1964 (JO 1964, 586) on the conditions for granting aid from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See, regarding the regional significance of such action, the First EC General Report (EC Commission Brussels 1968), p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Council Regulation 729/70 of 21 April 1970 (JO 1970 L94/13) relatif au financement de la politique commune agricole.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For example, Regulation 1402/86 of 6 May 1986 (OJ 1986 L128/9) introducing a common action for the encouragement of agriculture in the Scottish islands off the Northern and Western coasts with the exception of the Western Isles was adopted under Article 18 of Regulation 797/85 of 12 March 1985 (OJ 1985 L43/1) on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures, which amended Regulation 729/70. See generally Proposals on Policy with Regard to Agricultural Structures, COM(79) 122. Only financial participation by the EAGGF, Guidance Section was involved.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Council Directive 78/627 of 19 June 1978 (OJ 1978 L206/1) on the programme to accelerate the restructuring and conversion of vineyards in certain Mediterranean regions in France.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Council Regulation 1362/78 of 19 June 1978 (OJ 1978 L166/11) on the programme for the acceleration and guidance of collective irrigation works in the Mezzogiorno. 29 Council Directive 78/628 of 19 June 1978 (OJ 1978 L206/5) on a programme to accelerate drainage operations in the less-favoured areas of the West of Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Council Regulation 1400/86 of 6 May 1986 (OJ 1986 L128/1) introducing a common measure for the encouragement of agriculture by improving the rearing of beef cattle in certain less favoured areas of France.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Council Regulation 1401/86 of 6 May 1986 (OJ 1986 L128/5) introducing a common action for the encouragement of agriculture in certain less-favoured areas of Northern Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Council Regulation 1402/86 of 6 May 1986 (OJ 1986 L128/9) introducing a common action for the encouragement of agriculture in the Scottish islands of the northern and western coasts with the exception of the Western Isles (Outer Hebrides).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Council Regulation 1118/88 of 25 April 1988 (OJ 1988 L107/3) on a specific common measure to encourage the development of agriculture in certain regions of Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Regulation 1939/81 of 30 June 1981 (OJ 1981 L197/6) establishing an Integrated Development Programme for the Western Isles (Outer Hebrides).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Regulation 1820/80 of 24 June 1980 (OJ L180/1) for the stimulation of agricultural development in the less-favoured areas of the west of Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Regulations 1940/81 of 30 June 1981 (OJ 1981 L127/9) on an integrated development programme for the Department of Lozére.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Regulation 1941/81 of 30 June 1981 (OJ 1982 L197/13) on an integrated development programme for the less-favoured areas of Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Article 2 of Council Regulation 1939/81 of 30 June 1981 (OJ 1981 L197/6) on an integrated development programme for the Western Isles of Scotland (Outer Hebrides).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Regarding tensions between agricultural structural policy and regional policy, see the Opinion of the European Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture on aspects of the Community’s regional policy to be developed in the future, EP Doc. 35/77/Annex.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Council Regulation 1760/78 of 25 July 1978 (OJ 1978 L204/1) on a common measure to improve public amenities in certain rural areas.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Of 28 April 1975 (OJ 1975 L128/1) on mountain and hill farming and farming in less favoured areas, as last amended by Regulation 797/85 (OJ 1985 L93/1). New designations of beneficiary regions in Germany (Decision 91/26, OJ 1991 L16/27) and the United Kingdom (Decision 91/25, OJ 1991 L16/25) have been made. Regulation 3013/89 of 25 September 1989 (OJ 1989 L289/1) on the common organization of the market in sheepmeat and goatmeat provides for income compensation for producers of sheepmeat (in areas defined in the Annex to Regulation 872/84, OJ 1984 L90/40, as last amended by Regulation 1970/87, OJ 1987 L184/23) and goatmeat (in areas defined by Annex I to Regulation 1065/86, OJ 1986 L97/25, as last amended by Regulation 3519/86, OJ 1986 L325/17).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Council Regulation 1938/81 of 30 June 1981 (OJ 1981 L197/1) on a common measure to improve public amenities in certain less-favoured agricultural areas of the Federal Republic of Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Of 24 June 1980 (OJ 1980 L180/1) for the stimulation of agricultural development in the less-favoured areas of the west of Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Council Regulation 1942/81 of 30 June 1981 (OJ 1981 L197/17) for the stimulation of agricultural development in the less-favoured areas of Northern Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Council Regulation 1975/82 of 19 July 1982 (OJ 1982 L214/1) on the acceleration of agricultural development in certain regions of Greece

    Google Scholar 

  40. See the Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee of 24 October 1979 (OJ 1980 C53/22) on the proposals on the policy with regard to agricultural assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  41. OJ 1975, L73/1. See generally P. Romus, ‘La Creation du Feder: Debut de la Politique Regionale Européenne’ (1975) RMC 149–157; J. Elizade, ‘La Reforma del FEDER: Principios de una Autentica Politica Regional Comunitaria’ (1985) Revista de Istitucciones Europeas 93–107; J. Van Doom, ’European Regional Policy: an Evaluation of Recent Development’ (1975) JCMS 391–401; J.A. Winter, ’The ERDF and the Principle of Originality’ in In Orde, Liber Amicorum Pieter Verloren van Themaat (Deventer 1982 ) 365–80.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Commission of the European Communities, Second general report on the activities of the Communities,1968, Brussels-Luxembourg, February 1969, Para 47.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Commission of the European Communities, Fourth general report on the activities of the Communities,1970, Brussels—Luxembourg, February 1971, Para 300; JO 1969 C 152/6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Commission of the European Communities, Fifth general report on the activities of the Communities,1971, Brussels—Luxembourg, February 1972, Para. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Commission proposal of 31 July 1973 (OJ 1973 C86/7) for a Council Regulation establishing a Regional Development Fund. See also Report on the regional problems of the enlarged Community, Bull. EC 1973, Supp. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Commission of the European Communities, Seventh general report on the activities of the Communities,1973, Brussels— Luxembourg, February 1974, Para. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Resolution of 15 November 1973 (OJ 1973 C108/51) on the Commission proposals; see also the Resolution of 5 July 1973 (OJ 1973 C62/33) on Community regional policy.

    Google Scholar 

  48. n the same day that it established the ERDF, the Council set up a Regional Policy Committee, as an advisory body to the Council and the Commission. Council Decision 75/185 of 18 March 1975 (OJ 1975 L 74/47) setting up a Regional Policy Committee. Regulation 724/75 of the Council of 18 March 1975 (OJ 1975 L 73/1) establishing a European Regional Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Commission of the European Communities, Eleventh general report on the activities of the Communities,1977, Brussels— Luxembourg, February 1978, Para. 269–270 and OJ 1977 C 161/10.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Council Regulation 214/79 of 6 February 1979 (OJ 1979 L 35/1) amending Regulation 724/79 establishing a European Regional Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Commission of the European Communities, Thirteenth general report on the activities of the Communities,1979, Brussels—Luxembourg, February 1980, Paras 255–6. 66Resolution of the European Parliament of 19 June 1981 (OJ 1981 C172/117) on the Fifth Annual Report (1979) of the Commission of the European Communities on the European Regional Development Fund. For methodological criticisms, see Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee of 30 June 1982 (OJ 1982 C252/20) on the regions of Europe—first periodic report on the social and economic situation of the regions of the Community.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Resolution of 19 June 1981 (OJ 1981 C 172/117) on the Fifth Annual Report of the Commission of the European Communities on the European Regional Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Council Decision 85/595 of 29 (OJ 1983 L 340/24) November 1983 enabling the European Regional Development Fund to exceed the 70% for infrastructure investment projects for the period 1981 to 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation 724/75 establishing a European Regional Development Fund (COM(81) 589).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee of 29 April 1982 (OJ 1982 L178/38) on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation 724/75 establishing a European Regional Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  56. EC Seventeenth Genera! Report (EC Commission Brussels—Luxembourg, 1984), para. 362. The Commission had originally favoured replacement of national quotas with regional quotas. See Article 4 of the Proposal of 29 October 1981 (OJ 1981 C336/60). On the distribution of Fund resources according to indicative ranges, see also the Commission proposal of 18 November 1983 (OJ 1983 C360/1) for a Council Regulation amending Regulation 724/75 establishing a European Regional Development Fund. The third enlargement of the Community required modifications to these figures so as to accommodate Portugal and Spain. See the Declaration by the European Community on the participation of Spain and Portugal in the benefits derived from the resources of the European Regional Development Fund, annexed to the Spanish and Portuguese Accession Treaty (OJ 1985 L302/493). The modifications were made by Council Regulation 3641/85 of 20 December 1985 (OJ 1985 L350/40) amending Regulation 1787/84 on the European Regional Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Council Regulation 1787/84 of 19 June 1984 (OJ 1984 L169/1) on the European Regional Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  58. The Commission had envisaged a figure of 16.84%. See Article 4(3) of the Proposal of 18 November 1983 (OJ 1983 C360/1) for a Council Regulation amending Regulation 724/75 establishing a European Regional Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  59. See also the earlier Resolution of the Council of Ministers and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 22 March 1971 on Economic and Monetary Union (JO 1971 C28/1). See generally E. Faure and G. Gelee, ‘L’Union économique et monétaire et les desequilibres régionaux’ (1979) RMC 481–86 and T. Buck, ’Regional Policy and European Integration’ (1975) JCMS 368–78.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Council Regulation 2088/85 of 23 July 1985 (OJ 1985 L 197/1) concerning the integrated Mediterranean programmes.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Council Regulation 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 (OJ 1988 L 185/9) on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments. See also Council Regulation 4253/88 of 19 December 1988 (OJ 1988 L 374/1) laying down provisions for implementing Regulation 2052/88 of 19 December 1988 as regards coordination of the activities of the different Structural Funds between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Article 3(2) Council Regulation 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 (OJ 1988 L185/4) on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Council Regulation 4255/88 of 19 December 1988 (OJ 1988 L374/21) laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards the European Social Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  64. See The Community Structural Funds 1994–1999,COM(93) 67.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Article 2.2 Council Regulation 4256/88 of 19 December 1988 (OJ 1988 L 374/25) laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052 as regards the EAGGF Guidance Section.

    Google Scholar 

  66. See, for example, the EEC Eighth General Report (EEC Commission Brussels 1965), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  67. f 19 December 1988 (OJ 1988 L374/15) laying down provisions for implementing Regulation 2052/88 as regards the European Regional Development Find.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Third Periodic Report on the Social and Economic Situation and Development of the Regions of the European Community (EC Commissions Brussels 1987), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Of 25 January 1989 (OJ 1989 L101/41) fixing an indicative allowance between Member States of 85% of the commitment appropriations of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Objective 1 as defined by Council Regulation 2052/88. 106 See the Resolution of the European Parliament of 15 November 1985 (OJ 1985, C345/407) closing the procedure for consultation of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council for a Regulation amending Regulation 1787/84 on the European Regional Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Industrial employment is taken to refer to mining and quarrying and utilities, manufacturing and building and civil engineering. Service industries are not taken into account. See Commission Reply to Written Question 2955/90 by Lord Inglewood (OJ 1991 C195/21).

    Google Scholar 

  71. The 1973 Report on the Regional Problems in the Enlarged Community (Bull EC 1973 Supp. 8) defined disadvantaged regions as including those where unemployment was persistently over 3.5% and more than 20% above the national average or where annual emigration exceeded 1% over a long period.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Less flexibility was also entailed by the original Commission proposal of 31 July 1973 (OJ 1973, C86/7) for a Council Regulation establishing a European Regional Development Fund. According to Article 3(2) of this proposal, the Fund would only have been able to assist regions with a per capita GDP below the Community average.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Of 21 March 1989 (OJ 1989 L112/19) establishing an initial list of declining industrial areas concerned by Objective 2 as defined by Council Regulation 2052/88.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Fourth Periodic Report on the Social and Economic Situation and the Development of the Regions of the Community COM(90) 609, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Of 8 March 1989 (OJ 1989 L113/29) fixing an indicative allocation between Member States of 85% of the commitment appropriations of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Objective 2 as defined by Council Regulation 2052/88.

    Google Scholar 

  76. EC Twenty-Third General Report (EC Commission Brussels 1990), pp. 211–212. Infrastructure developments as well as promotion of small and medium-sized enterprises are also emphasised in the Integrated Mediterranean Programmes introduced by Regulation 2088/85 (OJ 1985 L197/1).

    Google Scholar 

  77. The European Parliament had proposed addition of Objective 5(c), which would have been concerned with conservation of the environment and continuation of farming in certain mountain and less-favoured regions. See EP Doc. A2–58/88.

    Google Scholar 

  78. OJ 1975 L128/1, as last amended by Regulation 797/85 (OJ 1985, L93/1). New designations of beneficiary regions in Germany (Decision 91/26 OJ 1991 L16/27) and the United Kingdom (Decision 91/25 OJ 1991 L16/25) have been made. See also Council Regulation 1760/78 (OJ 1978 L204/1) of 25 July 1978 on a common measure to improve public amenities in certain rural areas. Regulation 3013/89 (OJ 1989 L289/1) provides for income compensation for producers of sheepmeat (in areas defined in the Annex to Regulation 872/84, OJ 1984 L90/40, as last amended by Regulation 1970/87, OJ 1987 L184/23) and goatmeat (in areas defined by Annex I to Regulation 1065/86, OJ 1986 L97/25, as last amended by Regulation 3519/86, OJ 1986 L325/17).

    Google Scholar 

  79. See Commission Decision 89/426 of 10 May 1989 (OJ 1989 L189/1) selecting rural areas eligible to receive Community assistance under Objective 5(b) as defined by Council Regulation 2052/88.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Notice to Member States (91/C73/14) laying down guidelines for integrated global grants for which Member States are invited to submit proposals in the framework of a Community initiative for rural development (OJ 1991 C73/33; SEC(90) 1602). 126Notice C(90)1562/1 (OJ 1990 C196/15) to Member States laying down guidelines

    Google Scholar 

  81. Council Decision 89/687 of 22 December 1989 (OJ 1989 L399/39) establishing a programme of options specific to the remote and insular nature of the French overseas departments (Poseidom). This measure was adopted under Article 235 of the EC Treaty. 130 An amendment had to be made to the list of declining industrial areas eligible under Objective 2 to include certain parts of the coal—mining areas concerned in the Federal Republic of Germany, France and the United Kingdom. See Commission Decision 90/400 of 3 May 1990 (OJ 1990 L206/26) amending Commission Decision 89/288 establishing an initial list of declining industrial areas concerned by Objective 2 as defined by Council Regulation 2052 /88.

    Google Scholar 

  82. See the criticism in The Future of Rural Society, Fourteenth Report of the House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities, HL (1990) 80-I.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Andrew Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, European University Institute, Italy

    Stephen Martin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, A., Martin, S. (1994). EC Regional Policy and the Evolution of the Structural Funds. In: Martin, S. (eds) The Construction of Europe. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8368-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8368-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4433-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8368-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation