Skip to main content

Metaphor as Change of Representation: An Interaction Theory of Cognition and Metaphor

  • Chapter
Aspects of Metaphor

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 238))

Abstract

Imagine a poet comparing hawthorn (a wild flower shrub) to water. What are the similarities between the two? Suppose someone tells you that the ocean is like a harp. What can she possibly mean? How can a harp be similar to the ocean? In each of these cases, there seem to be no similarities between the two objects. Yet, in the poem White Hawthorn in the West of Ireland, Eavan Boland boldly likens hawthorn to water: “I drove West// ... past splashes of coltsfoot,// I assumed// the hard shyness of Atlantic light// and the superstitious aura of hawthorn.// All I wanted then was to fill my arms with// sharp flowers,// to seem, from a distance, to be part of// that ivory downhill rush ...// ... So I left it// stirring on those hills// with a fluency// only water has. And, like water, able// to redefine land. ...”; and in his classic poem Seascape, Stephen Spender compares the ocean to a harp: “There are some days the happy ocean lies// Like an unfingered harp, below the land.// Afternoon gilds all the silent wires// into a burning music for the eyes.” Each of these metaphors is quite unconventional and strikes a jarring chord when we encounter it at first. But after the metaphor is assimilated, we are left with beautiful, fresh and vivid imagery. In fact much of the beauty of these two poems comes from the novelty of their metaphors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Andersen, M.: 1967, ‘An Impression’, in S. Rozental (ed.), Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by His Friends and Colleagues, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T.: 1966, Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in Sociology of Knowledge, Double Day and Co. Inc.; Anchor Book Edition 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.: 1962, ‘Metaphor’, in M. Black (ed.), Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.: 1979, ‘More about Metaphor’, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, E.: The Hawthorn in the West of Ireland, appeared in The New Yorker, March 27, 1989, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camac, M. K. and Glucksberg, S.: 1984, ‘Metaphors Do Not Use Associations Between Concepts, They are Used to Created Them’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13(6), 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1955, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Vol. 1–3, translated by R. Manheim, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. and Gentner, D.: 1987, ‘How People Construct Mental Models’, in D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; Chap. 10 (pp. 243–265).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. I.: 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fass, F.: 1989, ‘Met*: A Method for Discriminating Metonymy and Metaphor by Computer’, Technical Report CSS/LCCR TR 89–15, Center for Systems Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. and Stuart, P.: 1983, ‘Metaphor as Structure-Mapping: What Develops’, BBN Report No. 5479, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1976, Languages of Art, 2nd ed., Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1978, Ways of Worldmaking, Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, W. J. J.: 1961, Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity, Harper and Row, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E.: 1978, ‘Darwin’s “Tree of Nature” and Other Images of Wide Scope’, in J. Wechsler (ed.), On Aesthetics in Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, G. S. and Wilson, W. H.: 1980, ‘A Category Theory Approach to Cognitive Development’, Cognitive Psychology 12, 356–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, C. R.: 1983, ‘Metaphors, Referents, and Individuality’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 12, 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, C. R.: 1989, Metaphor and Art: Interactionism and Reference in Verbal and Nonverbal Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. B.: 1974, The Structure of Scientific Inferences, University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeller, S. A.: 1982, The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead, The Theosophical Publishing House, Wheaton, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. R.: 1985, ‘Analogies and Role in Human and Machine Thinking’, in D. R. Hofstadter, Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern, Basic Books, Inc., New York; Chap. 24 (pp. 547–603).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D. and Quinn, N. (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D. H.: 1988, Eye, Brain and Vision, Scientific American Library, W. H. Freeman, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indurkhya, B.: 1991a, ‘On the Role of Interpretive Analogy in Learning’, New Generation Computing 8, 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indurkhya, B.: 1991b, ‘Modes of Metaphor’, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 6(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indurkhya, B.: 1992, Metaphor and Cognition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.: 1987, The Body in the Mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. G. and Malgady, R. G.: 1980, ‘Towards a Perceptual Theory of Metaphoric Comprehension’, in R. P. Honeck and R. R. Hoffman (eds.), Cognition and Figurative Language, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 258–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G.: 1963, Memories, Dreams and Reflection, edited by Aniela Jaffe, translated by Richard and Clara Winston, Random House, Inc. (Vintage Books), New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1787, Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Norman Kemp Smith, unabridged edition, St. Martin’s Press (1965), New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. H. and Keil, F. C.: 1987, ‘Metaphor Comprehension and Knowledge of Semantic Domains’, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 2(1) , pp. 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E. F.: 1987, Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure, Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A.: 1964, The Act of Creation, Hutchinsons of London; 2nd Danube ed., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausser, P.: 1974, ‘Kant’s Theory of the Structure of Empirical Scientific Inquiry and Two Implied Postulates Regarding Things in Themselves’, in L. W. Beck (ed.), Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 159–165.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1957, The Copernican Revolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 2nd enlarged ed., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, edited by J. Worrall and E. Zahar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1987, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.: 1980, Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Turner, M.: 1989, More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormac, E. R.: 1985, A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malgady, R. G. and Johnson, M. G.: 1980, ‘Measurement of Figurative Language: Semantic Feature Models of Comprehension and Appreciation’, in R. P. Honeck and R. R. Hoffman (eds.), Cognition and Figurative Language, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 239–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. H.: 1988, A Computational Theory of Metaphor, Ph. D. Dissertation, Computer Science Department, University of Calif. at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A.: 1983, ‘Conceptual Similarity and the Quality of Metaphor in Isolated Sentences Versus Extended Contexts’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 12(1), 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. I.: 1978, ‘Visualization Lost and Regained: The Genesis of the Quantum Theory in the Period 1913–27’, in J. Wechsler (ed.), On Aesthetics in Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 73–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U.: 1976, Cognition and Reality, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A.: 1979, ‘The Role of Similarity in Similes and Metaphors’, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A.: 1980, ‘Some Psycholinguistic Aspects of Metaphor’, in R. P. Honeck and R. R. Hoffman (eds.), Cognition and Figurative Language, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H.: 1979, ‘Montague Grammar, Mental Representations, and Reality’, in P. A. French et al. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, H. G.: 1979, ‘Metaphor and Learning’, A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 438–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1936, The Origin of Intelligence in the Child, trans. by Margaret Cook (1953), Penguine (1977), New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1937, The Construction of Reality in the Child, trans. by Margaret Cook (1954), Ballantine Books (1971), New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1945, Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood, trans. by C. Gattegno and F. M. Hodgson (1951), W. W. Norton and Company (1962), New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1967, Biology and Knowledge, trans. by B. Walsh (1971), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1970, Genetic Epistemology, translated by E. Duckworth, Columbia University Press, New York, NY (W. W. Norton edition, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S.: 1985, ‘Visual Cognition: An Introduction’, in S. Pinker (ed.), Visual Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1962, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Basic Books, New York: 2nd ed. 1965; Harper and Row: 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P.: 1978, ‘The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling’, in M. Johnson (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, University of Minnesota Press (1981), Minneapolis, Minn., pp. 228–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E.: 1978, ‘Principles of Categorization’, in E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A.: 1963, Displacement of Concepts, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A.: 1979, ‘Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy’, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 154–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scientific American: 1986, The Mind’s Eye, readings from Scientific American, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, G. M.: 1897, ‘Vision without Inversion of Retinal Image’, Psychological Review IV(5), September 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R. and Rips, L.: 1991, ‘Interpreting and Evaluating Metaphors’, Journal of Memory and Language 30, 452–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R. and Sternberg, R. J.: 1982, ‘Understanding and Appreciating Metaphors’, Cognition 11(3), May 1982, 203–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turbayne, C. M.: 1962, The Myth of Metaphor, revised edition with an appendix by R. Eberle ‘Models, Metaphors, and Formal Interpretations’, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S.: 1985, ‘Visual Routines’, in S. Pinker (ed.), Visual Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, R. R.: 1980, ‘Transformations in Knowing: A Realist View of Metaphor’, in R. P. Honeck and R. R. Hoffman (eds.), Cognition and Figurative Language, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 87–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner, J. E.: 1990, ‘Interaction Theories of Metaphor: Psychological Perspectives’, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 5(2), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, E. J.: 1984, ‘A Knowledge Representation Approach to Understanding Metaphors’, Computational Linguistics 10(1), January–March 1984, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, P. E.: 1962, Metaphor and Reality, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Indurkhya, B. (1994). Metaphor as Change of Representation: An Interaction Theory of Cognition and Metaphor. In: Hintikka, J. (eds) Aspects of Metaphor. Synthese Library, vol 238. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8315-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8315-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4385-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8315-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics