Abstract
Metaphor’s peculiar property to yield cognitive insight — often in otherwise false sentences — has been the focus of contemporary studies of metaphor. In Metaphor: Its Linguistic Structure and Cognitive Force, Kittay (1987) attempts to understand the cognitive force of metaphor by utilizing semantic field theory — a theory that assimilates conceptual structure to a semantic structure underlying the utterances we produce. According to semantic field theory, the meaning of a word is, in part, a function of its relation to words occupying the same conceptual terrain. For example, “red” takes its meaning, in part, from the other color terms in the language, terms with which it has the semantic relation of co-hyponym. Similarly, the meaning of “hot,” is determined, in part, in contrast to other terms in a gradable antonymy, that is, in contrast to “cold,” “warm,” and “cool.” The meaning of terms is also a function, in part, of the words with which they can collocate. For example, “fisherman” stands in the relation of AGENT to the verb “fish.” That is, at least part of what it means to be a fisherman is to be one who engages in the action of fishing. Furthermore, semantic field theory proposes that the lexicon is organized along conceptual affinities and contrasts reflected in the semantic relations that structure fields.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Anderson, J. R.: 1976, Language, Memory, and Thought, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hilisdale, NJ.
Arendt, H.: 1971, The Life of the Mind, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York.
Aristotle: 1987, Poetics. R. Janko (Trans.), Hackett, Indianapolis.
Barsalou, L.: 1992, ‘Frames, Concepts, and Conceptual Fields’, in Lehrer and Kittay (1992).
Black, M.: 1962, ‘Metaphor’, in M. Black (ed.), Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Black, M.: 1979, ‘More about Metaphor’, in Ortony (1979): 19–43.
Brooke-Rose, C.: 1970, A Grammar of Metaphor, Seeker and Warburg, London.
Carbonell, J. G. and Minton, S.: 1985, ‘Metaphor and Commonsense Reasoning’, in Hobbs and Moore (eds.), Formal Theories of the Commonsense World, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 405–426.
Cohen, T.: 1978, ‘Figurative Speech and Figurative Acts’, in M. Johnson (1981), pp. 182–199.
Collins, A. M. and Loftus, E. F.: 1975, ‘A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing’, Psychological Review 82, 407–428.
Croft, W.: 1991, Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Cruse, D. A.: 1986, Lexical Semantics, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Davidson, D.: 1978, ‘What Metaphors Mean’, in S. Sacks (ed.), On Metaphor, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 29–46.
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D. and Gentner, D.: 1989, ‘The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples’, Artificial Intelligence 41, 1–63.
Fillmore, C. and Atkins, B. T.: 1992, ‘Towards a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of risk and its Neighbors’, in Lehrer and Kittay (1992).
Gentner, D.: 1982, ‘Are Scientific Analogies Metaphors?’, in D. S. Miall (ed.), Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, The Humanities Press, New York, pp. 106–112.
Gentner, D.: 1983, ‘Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy’, Cognitive Science 7, 155–170.
Gentner, D.: 1989, ‘The Mechanisms of Analogical Learning’, in Vosniandou and Ortony (1989).
Gentner, D. and Gentner, D. R.: 1983, ‘Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity’, in D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (eds.), Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Gentner, D., Falkenhainer, and Skorstad, J.: 1988, ‘Viewing Metaphor as Analogy’, in Helman (1988), pp. 171–178.
Goodman, N.: 1976, Languages of Art, Hackett, Indianapolis.
Goodman, N.: 1978, ‘Metaphor as Moonlighting’, in S. Sacks (ed.), On Metaphor, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 175–180.
Hall, R. P.: 1989, ‘Computational Approaches to Analogical Reasoning: A Comparative Analysis’, Artificial Intelligence 39, 39–120.
Hebb, D. O.: 1949, The Organization of Behavior, John Wiley, New York.
Helman, D. H. (ed.): 1988, Analogical Reasoning: Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Hesse, M. B.: 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame.
Holyoak K. and Thagard, P.: 1990, ‘A Constraint-Satisfaction Approach to Analogue Retrieval and Mapping’, in K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. G. Keane, R. H. Logie and G. Erdos (eds.), Lines of Thinking (Vol. 1), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Holyoak, K. and Thagard P.: 1989a, ‘Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction’, Cognitive Science 13, 295–355.
Holyoak, K. and Thagard, P.: 1989b, ‘A Computational Model of Analogical Problem Solving’, in A Vosniandou and A Ortony (1989).
Indurkhya, B.: 1986, ‘Constrained Semantic Transference: A Formal Theory of Metaphors’, Synthese 68 (3), 515–552.
Indurkhya, B.: 1987, ‘Approximate Semantic Transference: A Computational Theory of Metaphors and Analogies’, Cognitive Science 11, 445–480.
Jackson, H.: 1990, Grammar and Meaning: A Semantic Approach to English Grammar, Longman, New York.
Johnson, M.: 1981, Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Johnson, M.: 1987, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kedar-Cabelli, S.: 1988, ‘Analogy — From a Unified Perspective’, in A Helman (1988).
Kintsch, W.: 1972, ‘Notes on the Structure of Semantic Memory’, in Tulving and Donaldson (1972).
Kittay, E. F.: 1987, Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kittay, E. F. and Steinhart, E.: 1991, ‘A Connectionist Interpretation of the Semantic Field Theory of Metaphor’, Symposium Presentation at the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.: 1980, Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lehrer, A. and Kittay, E. F.: 1992, Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, Erlbaum, New Jersey.
Lehrer, A.: 1974, Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure, American Elsevier, New York.
Levin, S. R.: 1977, The Semantics of Metaphor, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Lyons, J.: 1977, Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
MacCormac, E. R.: 1985, A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E.: 1981, ‘An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: Part 1. An Account of Basic Findings’, Psychological Review 88, 375–407.
McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E.: 1989, Explorations in Parallel Distributed Processing: A Handbook of Models, Programs, and Exercise, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.
Miller, G. A.: 1979, ‘Images and Models, Similes and Metaphors’, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 202–250.
Miller, G. A. and Johnson-Laird, P. N.: 1976, Language and Perception, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Miller, G. A., Fellbaum, C., Kegl, J. and Miller, K.: 1988, ‘WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Reference System Based on Theories of Lexical Memory’, Revue Quebecoise de Linguistique 17, 191–213.
Miller, G. A. (ed.): 1990, ‘WordNet: an On-Line Lexical Database’, International Journal of Lexicography 3(4) (Entire volume).
Norman, D. A. and Rumelhart, D. E.: 1975, Explorations in Cognition, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Novick, L. R.: 1988, ‘Analogical Transfer: Processes and Individual Differences’, in Helman (1988).
Plato: 1984, Theatetus. Seth Bernardete (Trans.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Rothbart, D.: 1984, ‘The Semantics of Metaphor and the Structure of Science’, Philosophy of Science 51, 595–615.
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. et al.: 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing (Vol. 1), MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Russell, S.: 1989, The Use of Knowledge in Analogy and Induction, Pitman, London.
Schank, R. and Abelson, R.: 1977, Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Thagard, P.: 1988, ‘Dimensions of Analogy’, in Helman (1988).
Thagard, P., Holyoak, K., Nelson, G. and Gochfeld, D.: 1990, ‘Analogue Retrieval by Constraint Satisfaction’, Artificial Intelligence 46, 259–310.
Tirrell, L.: 1991, ‘Reductive and Nonreductive Simile Theories of Metaphor’, Journal of Philosophy 88(7), 337–358.
Tulving, E.: 1972, ‘Episodic and Semantic Memory’, in Tulving and Donaldson (1972).
Tulving, E. and Donaldson, W. (eds.): 1972, Organization of Memory, Academic Press, New York.
Tversky, A.: 1977, ‘Features of Similarity’, Psychological Review 84, 327–352.
Vosniandou, S. and Ortony, A. (eds.): 1989, Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, London.
Woods, W. A.: 1975, ‘What’s in a Link: Foundations for Semantic Networks’, in D. G. Bobrow and A. Collins (eds.), Representation and Understanding, Academic Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinhart, E., Kittay, E. (1994). Generating Metaphors from Networks: A Formal Interpretation of the Semantic Field Theory of Metaphor. In: Hintikka, J. (eds) Aspects of Metaphor. Synthese Library, vol 238. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8315-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8315-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4385-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8315-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive