Abstract
It does not seem inappropriate to apply Darwin’s concept of natural selection to our beliefs. Yet it would be wrong to infer that all those beliefs which have promoted habits of action congenial to survival are for that reason to be regarded as true. The “happy” stress-reducing lie is sometimes preferable to truth. Survival results from many natural adaptations; the bird that runs and kicks cannot fly. Natural selection allows our biologically evolved brains to be associated with thinking that is sometimes less than rational.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Leibniz, G [1966] On True Method in Philosophy and Theology. In: Richard H. Popkin (ed.), The Philosophy of the 16th and 17th Centuries. New York: The Free Press.
Lewin, Roger [1988] Chance and Repetition. In: Science, 240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Werth, L.F. (1994). Evolutionary Epistemology and Pragmatism. In: Debrock, G., Hulswit, M. (eds) Living Doubt. Synthese Library, vol 243. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8252-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8252-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4414-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8252-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive