Abstract
Evidence from preference studies suggests that infants can discriminate face and non-face patterns and usually prefer to look longer at face-like patterns. This face preference is present at birth. Recognition memory studies demonstrate that the learning curve for face and non-face patterns differ. On the basis of this and other evidence, some have suggested that faces represent an ecologically privileged class of stimuli and that there is a qualitative difference between the recognition and identification of face and non-face patterns.
Others note that the recognition of faces requires many generalized abilities and suggest it is not qualitatively different from the perception of non-face patterns. For example, the very young infant’s preference for face-like patterns is reduced when face and non-face patterns are equated for visibility (based on amplitude spectra). Most neonates treat faces as abstract patterns and base their preferences for patterns on visibility. Categorization of abstracts and faces uses the same mechanism and processes. Increased experience with faces leads to different categorizations for faces than for abstracts, based on different cues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atkinson, J., Braddick, O., and Wattam-Bell, J. (1986). ‘Development of the discrimination of spatial phase in infancy’, Vision Research 26, 1223–1239.
Banks, M. S., and Ginsburg, A. P. (1985). ‘Early visual preferences: A review and new theoretical treatment’, in H. W. Reese (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 19), New York: Academic.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1 Attachment, Basic Books, New York.
Dannemiller, J. L., and Stephens, B. R. (1987). ‘A critical test of infant preference models’, Child Development 13, 1109–1120.
Fantz, R. L. (1961). ‘The origin of form perception’, Scientific American, 204(5), 66–72.
Fantz, R. L. and Nevis, S. (1967). ‘Perceptual preferences and perceptual-cognitive development in early infancy’, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 13, 77–108.
Goren, C. C., Sarty, M. and Wu, P. Y. K. (1975). Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics, 56, 544–549.
Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H. D., and Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1–19.
Kleiner, K. A. (1987). ‘Amplitude and phase spectra as indices of infants’ pattern preferences’, Infant Behavior and Development 10, 49–59.
Kleiner, K. A. and Banks, M. S. (1987). ‘Stimulus energy does not account for 2-month-olds’ face preferences’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13(4), 594–600.
Morton, J. and Johnson, M. H. (1991). Conspec and Conlern: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kleiner, K.A. (1993). Specific VS. Non-Specific Face Recognition Device. In: de Boysson-Bardies, B., de Schonen, S., Jusczyk, P., McNeilage, P., Morton, J. (eds) Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life. NATO ASI Series, vol 69. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8234-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8234-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4251-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8234-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive