Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 71))

Abstract

This Workshop marks the thirtieth anniversary of the event which is normally regarded as the birth of modern design methodology and the design methods movement - the Conference on Design Methods held in London in 1962. The movement almost died in the 1970s, but seems now to have hung on to life and to have re-emerged and grown with some vigour in the last decade. This paper reviews this relatively short history of design methodology, maps out some of the major themes that have sustained it, and tries to establish some agreed understanding for the concepts of scientific design, design science and the science of design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, C. (1964), Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, Ma., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (1971), “The State of the Art in Design Methods.” DMG Newsletter 5 (3): 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altshuller, G. S. (1984), Creativity as an Exact Science. Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, M. M. (1991), “Design Methodology.” Journal of Engineering Design 2 (4): 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1965), Systematic Method for Designers. London, The Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1979), “Whatever Became of Design Methodology?” Design Studies 1 (1): 17–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1981), A View of the Nature of Design Research. In R. Jacques and J. Powell (ed.) Design:Science:Method. Guildford, UK, Westbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asimow, M. (1962), Introduction to Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ., Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1958), Thinking: an experimental and social study. London, UK, Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, G. (1973), Design in Architecture. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, G. (1979), “The Development of Design Methods.” Design Methods and Theories 13 (1): 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, G. and A. Ward, (ed.) (1969), Design Methods in Architecture. London, UK, Lund Humphries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1989), Declaration by Design: rhetoric, argument and demonstration in design practice. In V. Margolin (ed.) Design Discourse. Chicago, Ill., University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, R. and A. Snodgrass (1991), “Is Designing Mysterious? Challenging the dual knowledge thesis.” Design Studies 12 (3): 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, A. (1984), “Towards an Understanding of the Intrinsic Values of Design Education.” Design Studies 5 (1): 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, A. (1986), “Design Intelligence: the use of codes and language systems in design.” Design Studies 7 (1): 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1980), The Recent History of Post-industrial Design Methods. In N. Hamilton (ed.) Design and Industry. London, The Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N., (ed.) (1984), Developments in Design Methodology. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1989), Engineering Design Methods. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1990), “The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability.” Design Studies 11 (3): 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N., K. Dorst, N. Roozenburg, (ed.) (1992), Research in Design Thinking. Delft, Netherlands, Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N., J. Naughton, et al. (1981), Design Method and Scientific Method. In R. Jacques and J. Powell (ed.) Design:Science:Method. Guildford, UK, Westbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. and R. J. Talbot (1987), “Experiencing Ideas: identity, insight and the imago.” Design Studies 8 (1): 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. R. and S. Finger (1989), “Editorial.” Research in Engineering Design 1 (1): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, M. (1988), “The Form of Design Processes: a protocol analysis study.” Design Studies 9 (2): 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B., J. Powell, R. Talbot, (ed.) (1982), Changing Design. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, U. (1987), The Role of Shape Grammars in the Analysis and Creation of Designs. In Y. E. Kalay (ed.) Computability of Design. New York, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. J. (1985), Conceptual Design for Engineers. London, UK, The Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparski, W. (1990), “Editorial: Contributions to Design Science.” Design Methods and Theories 24 (2): 1186–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparski, W. (1990), “On the General Theory (Praxeology) of Design.” Design Methods and Theories 24 (2): 1195–1215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J., (ed.) (1991), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘81. Oxford, UK, Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. (1985), “Science and Perception as Design.” Design Studies 6 (3): 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, W. J. J. (1961), Synectics. New York, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D. P. (1979), “Design Methodology and Design Methods.” Design Methods and Theories 13 (1): 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. A., (ed.) (1966), The Design Method. London, Butterworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. A. (1966), Design Science. In S. A. Gregory (ed.) The Design Method. London, Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. D. (1962), A Methodology for Systems Engineering. Princeton, NJ, Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, F. (1974), Konstruktionswissenschaft. Munich, Germany, Carl Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, J. R. and D. Clausing (1988), “The House of Quality.” Harvard Business Review (May/June): 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., J. Musgrove, et al. (1972), Knowledge and Design. In W. J. Mitchell (ed.) Environmental Design: Research and Practice. Los Angeles, Ca., University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongo, K. and N. Nakajima (1991), “Relevant Features of the Decade 1981–1991 for Theories of Design in Japan.” Design Studies 12 (4): 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V. (1982), Principles of Engineering Design. Guildford, UK, Butterworth Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V. and W. E. Eder (1987), “A Scientific Approach to Engineering Design.” Design Studies 8 (3): 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, R. and J. Powell, (ed.) (1981), Design:Science:Method. Guildford, UK, Westbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. C. (1970), Design Methods. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. C. (1977), “How My Thoughts About Design methods Have Changed During the Years.” Design Methods and Theories 11 (1): 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. C. and D. G. Thornley, (ed.) (1963), Conference on Design Methods. Oxford, UK, Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Corbusier (1929), CIAM 2nd Congress, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, R. (1985), “Science, Technology and Design.” Design Studies 6 (2): 66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R. (1986), “Issue-Serve Systems: a descriptive theory of design.” Design Methods and Theories 20 (3): 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. T., (ed.) (1970), Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning. Cambridge, Ma., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F. (1963), Applied Imagination - Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. New York, Scribener’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R. (1990), “Prior Knowledge in Design.” Design Studies 11 (1): 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G. and W. Beitz (1984), Engineering Design. London, The Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, S. (1991), Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering. Wokingham, UK, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. (1973), “The State of the Art in Design Methods.” Design Research and Methods (Design Methods and Theories) 7 (2): 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. and M. Webber (1973), “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozenburg, N. (1992), On the Logic of Innovative Design. In N. Cross, C. Dorst and N. Roozenburg (ed.) Research in Design Thinking. Delft, NL, Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozenburg, N. and N. Cross (1991), “Models of the Design Process: integrating across the disciplines.” Design Studies 12 (4): 215–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P. J. (1988), Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, P. (1987), Design Thinking. Cambridge, Ma., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1984), “Problems, Frames and Perspectives on Designing.” Design Studies 5 (3): 132–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1988), “Designing: rules, types and worlds.” Design Studies 9 (3): 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1969), The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, Ma., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillers, W. R., (ed.) (1974), Basic Questions of Design Theory. Amsterdam/New York, North-Holland/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, L., D. Ullman, et al. (1987), Protocol Analysis of Mechanical Engineering Design. In W. E. Eder (ed.) Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, Boston. New York, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, L. A., (ed.) (1991), Design Theory and Methodology - DTM ‘81. New York, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G. (1980), “Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars ” Environment and Planning B 7: 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovey, M. (1986), “Thinking Styles and Modelling Systems.” Design Studies 7 (1): 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Doesberg, T. (1923), “Towards a Collective Construction.” De Stijl: Quoted

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, G. (1968) The Bauhaus, Studio Vista, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI) (1987), Systematic Approach to the Design of Technical Systems and Products: Guideline VDI 2221. Berlin, Germany, Beuth Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B. and K. J. Waldron (1988), “A Time Sequence Study of a Complex Mechanical System Design.” Design Studies 9 (2): 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, K. and C. Hales (1987), Detailed Analysis of an Engineering Design Project. In W. E. Eder (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Boston. New York, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willem, R. A. (1990), “Design and Science.” Design Studies 11 (1): 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y. and G. D. Cheng (1991), “On the Logic of Design.” Design Studies 12 (3): 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, F. (1948), The Morphological Method of Analysis and Construction. In Studies and Essays. New York, Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cross, N. (1993). A History of Design Methodology. In: de Vries, M.J., Cross, N., Grant, D.P. (eds) Design Methodology and Relationships with Science. NATO ASI Series, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8220-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8220-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4252-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8220-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics