Skip to main content

Role Theory in View of Postmodernism and the “Author Effect”

  • Chapter
Japanese and Western Phenomenology

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 12))

  • 133 Accesses

Abstract

Critics of postmodernism claim that this philosophy culminates in the destruction of culture and order, due to the epistemology that is advanced. The argument in this paper is that such a charge is inaccurate. Therefore, the image of knowledge and order promulgated by postmodems is discussed. Additionally, roles are illustrated to be compatible with postmodernism, as long as the traditional version of role theory is significantly altered. The social construction of order can be captured by roles, if these constructs are not portrayed in structural terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barthes, R. 1977. Image, Text, Music. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. 1984. The Nature of Social Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. 1977. “Nomad Thought.” In The New Nietzsche, ed. David B. Allison. New York: Delta. pp. 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. 1977. Anti-Oedipus. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. 1983. On the Line. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. 1976. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1983. Pragmatism and Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1979. “What is an Author?” In Textual Strategies. ed. Josué Harari. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. pp. 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebser, J. 1985. The Ever-Present Origin. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1987. Social Theory and Modem Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. A. 1985. “Writing the Body: Toward an Understanding of l’ Ecriture Féminine.” In The New Feminist Criticism. ed. Elaine Showalter. New York: Pantheon. pp. 361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. 1985. Feminine Sexuality. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1982. The Differentiation of Society. New York. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J-F. and J-L Thébaud. 1985. Just Gaming. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. H. 1976. “Steven’s Rock and Criticism as Cure.” Georgia Review. 30: 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. 1966. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjam in Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. and R. T. Serpe. 1982. “Commitment, Identity Salience, and Role Behavior: Theory and Research Example.” In Personality, Roles and Social Behavior. edd. William Ickes and Eric C. Knowles. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. 1982. The Structure of Sociological Theory. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. 1962. “Role Taking: Process versus Conformity.” In Human Behavior and Social Processes. ed. Arnold M. Rose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. 1976. “The Real Self: From Institution to Impulse.” American Journal of Sociology. 81: 898–1016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murphy, J.W. (1993). Role Theory in View of Postmodernism and the “Author Effect”. In: Blosser, P., Shimomissé, E., Embree, L., Kojima, H. (eds) Japanese and Western Phenomenology. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8218-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8218-6_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4227-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8218-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics