Skip to main content

Micromechanics of Fracture

  • Chapter
  • 527 Accesses

Part of the book series: Solid Mechanics and Its Applications ((SMIA,volume 14))

Abstract

The phenomenon of fracture of solids may be approached from different viewpoints depending on the scale of observation. At one extreme is the atomic approach where the phenomena take place in the material within distances of the order of 10−7 cm; at the other extreme is the continuum approach which models material behavior at distances greater than 10−2 cm. In the atomic approach, the problem is studied using the concepts of quantum mechanics; the continuum approach uses the theories of continuum mechanics and classical thermodynamics. A different approach should be used to explain the phenomena that take place in the material between these two extreme scales: movement of dislocations; formation of subgrain boundary precipitates, slip bands, grain inclusions and voids. The complex nature of the phenomenon of fracture prohibits a unified treatment of the problem, and the existing theories deal with the subject either from the microscopic or the macroscopic point of view. Attempts have been made to bridge the gap between these two approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Knott, J.F. (1981) Fundamentals of Fracture Mechanics,Butterworths, pp. 188–203.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, E. (1966) ‘The nucleation and growth of cleavage microcracks in mild steel’, Proc. Conference on Physical Basis of Yield and Fracture, Institute of Physics and Physical Society, Oxford, pp. 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argon, A.S., Im, J., and Safogly, R. (1975) ‘Cavity formation from inclusions in ductile fracture’, Metallurgical Transactions 6A, 825–837.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beremin, F.M. (1981) ‘Cavity formation from inclusions in ductile fracture of A 508 steel’, Metallurgical Transactions 12A, 723–731.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goods, S.H. and Brown, L.M. (1979) ‘The nucleation of cavities by plastic deformation’, Acta Mechanica 27, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McClintock, F.A. (1968) ‘Ductile rupture by the growth of holes’, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Trans. ASME 35, 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rice, J.R. and Tracey, D.M. (1969) ‘On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields’, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 17, 201–217.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurson, A.L. (1977) ‘Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part 1 — Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media’, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 99, 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tvergaard, V. (1982) ‘On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids’, International Journal of Fracture 18, 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McGonnagle, W.J. (1971) ‘Nondestructive testing’, in Fracture — An Advanced Treatise, Vol. III, Engineering Fundamentals and Environment Effects (ed. H. Liebowitz ), Academic Press, pp. 371–430.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coffey, J.M. and Whittle, M.J. (1981) Non-destructive testing: its relation to fracture mechanics and component design’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A299, 93–110.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coffey, J.M. (1980) ‘Ultrasonic measurement of crack dimensions in laboratory specimens’, in The Measurement of Crack Length and Shape During Fracture and Fatigue (ed. C.J. Beevers ), EMAS, pp. 345–385.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Catou, M.M., Flavenot, J.F., Flambard, C., Madelaine, A., and Anton, F. (1980) ‘Automatic measurement of crack length during fatigue. Testing using ultrasonic surface waves’, in The Measurement of Crack Length and Shape During Fracture and Fatigue (ed. C.J. Beevers ), EMAS, pp. 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richard, C.E. (1980) ‘Some guidelines to the selection of techniques’, in The Measurement of Crack Length and Shape During Fracture and Fatigue (ed. C.J. Beevers), EMAS, pp. 461–468. 10.15. Krautkramer, J. and Krautkramer, H. (1977) Ultrasonic Testing of Materials (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krautkramer, J. and Krautkramer, H. (1977) Ultrasonic Testing of Materials (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gdoutos, E.E. (1993). Micromechanics of Fracture. In: Fracture Mechanics. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8158-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8158-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-8160-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8158-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics