Abstract
Questions about Niels Bohr and philosophy quickly — perhaps too quickly — turn into questions about whether or not Bohr was an idealist, a positivist, a transcendentalist, a realist, an anti-realist, an objective anti-realist, an instrumentalist, a phenomenalist and so on. But are these the right quest ions to ask? Such questions arise out of a western philosophical tradition shaped by the deceptively simple verb ‘is’ (or equivalent copulas), a verb which ‘lies’ at the heart of all our propositions, separating and joining subject and object, posing distinction and equivalence at one and the same time. The copula suggests a correspondence between words and world, between subject and object, and the consequent possibility of truth and control, of capturing the present eternally.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Honner, J. (1994). Description and Deconstruction. In: Faye, J., Folse, H.J. (eds) Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 153. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8106-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8106-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4299-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8106-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive