Abstract
Now a terminology shall be “reconstructed” step-by-step, according to the principle of methodical order, with the goal of providing reliable knowledge about the three-dimensionality of space. The word “reconstruct” is supposed to suggest that it is not a matter of inventing an artificial language here, but merely a matter of explicitly reenacting distinctions which are already known. In so doing, ordinary language must be taken into consideration, as well as the usual distinctions of the relevant branches of science. One must certainly pay heed, for example, to logical or methodical incompatibilities in the familiar ways of speaking. Thus, the greater exactitude of an explicit regulation of language often requires a deviation from accustomed language usage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Janich, P. (1992). The Construction of the Terminology. In: Euclid’s Heritage: Is Space Three-Dimensional?. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 52. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8096-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8096-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4217-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8096-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive