Abstract
It is self-evident that the three-dimensionality of space must, in the end be grasped as a description of spatial states of affairs (Sachverhalte). 14 It is, in any case, open as to which “things” (Sachen) “behave” (verhalten) spatially in three-dimensions, and which reasons suggest (or even compel) their three-dimensional description. The purely spatial approaches seek reasons in geometry or in the description of bodies, their form, magnitude or position. The supplementation of motion (of bodies or of geometrical forms) assumes that the triad cannot be proven purely spatially. Finally, in the approach which deduces three-dimensionality from physical laws, the addition of the effects of force is taken as an argument for three-dimensionality for the first time. These are the three groups of approaches that have been discussed up to now.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Janich, P. (1992). Causalistic Explanations and Three-Dimensionality. In: Euclid’s Heritage: Is Space Three-Dimensional?. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 52. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8096-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8096-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4217-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8096-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive