Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Nijhoff International Philosophy Series ((NIPS,volume 45))

  • 189 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter shows how ingredients of Brentano’s reformed logic (Chapter 3) can be used to provide the basis for a system of logic equivalent in strength to Lesniewski’s Ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brentano uses ‘existential proposition’ for both affirmations and denials of existence. Reducibility is not symmetric for Brentano: it is therefore stronger than logical equivalence. Brentano’s reasons have to do with his theory of judgement, which we here leave aside; we shall consider only the symmetric relation of logical equivalence.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brentano 1973, 210f.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Prior 1976, 115, where this is called “an answer to Brentano”. What follows is effectively an answer to Prior.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Chapter 9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Development’ and `growth’ can be understood either literally, or as referring to an abstract ordering. Leéniewski preferred the former reading, and with his aversion to ideal entities, Brentano would probably have sympathized.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For an indication as to how these conditions are stated in a nominalistically and finitistically acceptable way, cf. Luschei 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. n the relationship between Leéniewskian and classical quantifiers cf. Chapter 11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. An expression other than a sentence is propositive if its syntactic category in the usual quotient notation begins with an `S’. Predicates are propositive. The category index of names and nominative expressions begins with `N’.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Compare Lejewski 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. Simons 1982e.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cf. Lejewski 1958, 165ff., also Lejewski 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simons, P. (1992). A Brentanian Basis for Leśniewskian Logic. In: Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8094-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8094-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4129-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8094-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics