Abstract
The tax reform that came into force in Italy in 1973–74 was the result of a consistent effort in order to realize a rational scheme founded on certain tax principles, i.e. effective income as a tax base, transparency and progressivity among others2. Even if its final outcome was somewhat less ambitious than expected, actually the reform led to a share of direct taxes above 50%, mostly due to the personal income tax (IRPEF), as opposed to the previous Italian fiscal system which was largely founded on the indirect taxes. Nevertheless, the tax reform was achieved in a time of changing ideologies and of upheaval in the economic and social system: after so much effort, it came about just when the principles which it was based upon were coming under discussion. In fact direct taxation was seriously questioned, and under the impulse of changed environmental conditions, opinion moved heavily in the opposite direction away from direct taxation. As far as IRPEF is concerned, its high revenue, paradoxily, was surely responsible for the most critical reflections. Among the specific factors, which contributed in reducing the limits of tolerance of the fiscal burden on those classes actually affected by the tax, one can note:
-
i)
the enormous reduction in the purchasing power of money, which led the real tax rates upwards;
-
ii)
heavy tax erosion and tax evasion, both of them negative features of IRPEF as far as equity is considered: one could perhaps wonder whether IRPEF is now a badly designed special tax rather than a general one;
-
iii)
the urgent need for yield, implied by the dynamics of public expenditure, which until recently prevented even partially recovering fiscal drag.
This work was undertaken under the auspices of grant number 89.051120.10 from C.N.R. We are grateful to Tom Rutherford for letting us use his MPS.GE algorithm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C.L. Ballard, D. Fullerton, J.B. Shoven andJ. Whalley, (1985). A General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation, NBER, Chicago University Press.
A. Biagioli, C. Chiesa, G. Gomel and F. Palmisani, (1983). Un Modello Operativo per l’Analisi a Breve Termine della Bilancia dei Pagamenti, in Ricerche sui Modelli per la Politica Economica, Banca d’Italia, Roma.
R. Boadway and J. Treddenick, (1978). A General Equilibrium Computation of the Effect of the Canadian Tariff Structure, Canadian Journal of Economics, van, pp.424–445.
C. Chiesa, R and Valcamonici, (1983). Uno Schema Previsivo della Bilancia Commerciale e del Sistema dei Prezzi Interni dell’Italia, in Ricerche sui modelli per la politica economica, Banca d’Italia, Roma.
R.L. Clarete and A.J. Roumasset, (1987). A Shoven-Whalley Model of a Small Open Economy. An Illustration with Philippine Tariffs, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 32, pp. 247–261.
R.R. Cornwall, (1984). Introduction to the Use of General Equilibrium Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
C. D’Adda et al., (1976). Un modello per l’economia italiana. Il Modello Econometrico dell’Università di Bologna: Struttura e Simulazioni, Il Mulino, Bologna.
A.V. Deardoff and R.M. Stern, (1981). A Disaggregated Model of World Production and Trade: An Estimate of the Impact of the Tokio Round, Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 3, pp. 127–152.
P. Dixon, B. Parmenter, J. Sutton and D. Vincent, (1982). ORANI: A Multisectoral Model of the Australian Economy, North Holland, Amsterdam.
M. Feldstein ed., (1983). Behavioral Simulation Methods in Tax Policy Analysis, NBER, University of Chicago Press.
A. Fossati ed., (1991). Equilibrio generale e simulazioni, Franco Angeli, Milano. G. Fuà, (1977). Il Modellaccio, Franco Angeli, Milano.
G. Gandolfo, (1981). Un Modello Macrodinamico dell’Economia Italiana: Aspetti Teorici e Risultati Empirici, Note Economiche, n. 1, pp. 11–61.
L.H. Goulder, J.B. Shoven and J. Whalley (1983). Domestic Tax Policy and the Foreign Sector: The Importance of Alternative Foreign Sector Formulations to Results from a General Equilibrium Tax Analysis Model, in Behavioral Simulation Methods in Tax Policy Analysis, ( M. Feldstein ed.), NBER, University of Chicago Press.
Ministero delle Finanze, (1983). Analisi delle dichiarazioni dei redditi delle persone fisiche,Roma.
C. Perron and T. Rutherford, (1989). A “Regularly Flexible” Nested CES Function for Applied General Equilibrium Analysis, Working Paper, Wilfrid Laurier University and University of Western Ontario.
J. Piggott and J. Whalley, (1977). General Equilibrium Investigation of the U.K. Tax-Subsidy Policy: A Progress Report,Studies in Modern Economic Analysis.
J. Piggott and J. Whalley eds., (1985). New Developments in Applied General Equilibrium Analysis,Cambridge University Press.
F. Ricotta, (1986). Rassegna critica delle stime econometriche delle elasticita’-prezzo e delle elasticita’-reddito delle esportazioni e delle importazioni italiane, Working Paper, progetto finalizzato C.N.R., Struttura ed evoluzione dell’economia italiana.
F. Ricotta, (1986). Scelta della specificazione appropriata per le funzioni di domanda di importazioni ed esportazioni: la metodologia di Thursby-Thursby applicata alla domanda di esportazioni italiane, Working Paper, progetto finalizzato C.N.R., Struttura ed evoluzione dell’economia italiana.
T. Rutherford, (1988). General equilibrium modeling with MPS/GE, Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario.
H.E. Scarf and J.B. Shoven eds., (1984). Applied General Equilibrium Analysis,Cambridge University Press.
H.E. Scarf, (1984). The Computation of Equilibrium Prices, in Applied General Equilibrium Analysis, (H.E. Scarf and J.B. Shoven eds. ), Cambridge University Press.
J.B. Shoven, (1974). A Proof of the Existence of a General Equilibrium with ad Valorem Commodity Taxes, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 8, pp. 1–25.
J.B. Shoven (1976). The Incidence and Efficiency Effects of Taxes on Income from Capital, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84, pp. 1261–1284.
J.B. Shoven, (1983). Applied General-Equilibrium Tax Modeling, I.M.F. Staff Papers, n. 30, pp. 394–419.
J.B. Shoven and J. Whalley, (1972). A General Equilibrium Calculation of the Effects of Differential Taxation of Income from Capital in the U.S., Journal of Public Economics, vol. 1, pp. 281–321.
J.B. Shoven and J. Whalley, (1973). General Equilibrium with Taxes: A computational Procedure and an Existence Proof, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 40, pp. 475–489.
J.B. Shoven and J. Whalley, (1977). Equal Yield Tax Alternatives: General Equilibrium Computational Techniques, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 8, pp. 211–224.
J.B. Shoven and J. Whalley, (1984). Applied General-Equilibrium Model of Taxation and International Trade: An Introduction and Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 22, pp. 1007–1051.
J. Whalley, (1975). A General Equilibrium Model of the 1973 UK Tax Reform, Economica, vol. 165, pp. 139–161.
J. Whalley and B. Yeung, (1984). External Sector ‘Closing’ Rules in Applied General Equilibrium Models, Journal of International Economics, vol. 16, pp. 123–138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fossati, A., Cavalletti, B., Pench, A. (1993). From Personal to Indirect Taxation: A General Equilibrium Approach. In: Galeotti, G., Marrelli, M. (eds) Design and Reform of Taxation Policy. Financial and Monetary Policy Studies, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7965-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7965-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4216-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7965-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive