Abstract
Though often used interchangeably, the terms, medical “self-care” and “holistic medicine” are not at all synonymous. Self-care is an attempt by ordinary people to learn and use medical techniques for themselves. It is a reaction to the systematic disempowerment of patients within contemporary medical institutions. But self-care does not necessarily involve a critique of contemporary medical science itself. Holistic medicine, by contrast, does begin with a critique of medical science, and proposes an alternative direction. Holistic medicine rejects not so much a certain social role, I will argue, as a certain metaphysics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A note about terms. The old, familiar medical model is being challenged from so many different directions these days that what to call that model is itself in question. Each alternative medicine describes the prevailing medicine as the opposite of itself. Some of the literature in holistic medicine calls it “scientific” medicine, to contrast it with a less detached and mechanical view of the body [20]. But homeopaths argue that orthodox medicine is not truly scientific; only an alternative medicine, their own, is really science [5]. Their term, “allopathy”, makes the contrast in terms of medicine’s approach to the presumed causal agents of disease. Others see the dominant medical institutions much more as institutions: thus they use more sociological labels, like “institutional” or “conventional” medicine. Phyllis Mattson calls it “cosmopolitan” medicine [14]. I choose “orthodox” mainly because it seems more neutral than most of the other terms. Probably only once the prevailing model has been bracketed and put in its place in a more pluralistic system — or once we have moved past the present orthodoxy entirely — are we likely to see it clearly enough as a whole to have any adequate label.
Often the term “self-help” is used to distinguish feminist self-care from medically-sponsored self-care ([3], pp. 575-576).
I owe this point and the one that follows to Dorian Gregory.
The debate over the homeopaths’ use of enormously diluted drugs also comes back to homeopathy’s looser commitment to materialism. Some tests appear to confirm the efficacy of solutions so dilute that no atom of the diluted substance is likely to remain in the patient’s dosage. Explanations are not easy to come by, but homeopaths have been known to suggest that, as Brian Inglis puts it, “the process of attenuation makes a drug more potent by reducing the material substance to a point where only the energy remains” ([12], pp. 82-84).
Bibliography
Comment: ‘Foetal Biophysic Monitoring: Its Effects on the Cesarean Section and Perinatal Mortality Frequency’, Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 37, 179-180.
The Boston Women’s Health Book Collective: 1971, Our Bodies, Ourselves, 1st ed., Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
The Boston Women’s Health Book Collective: 1984, Our Bodies, Ourselves, 3rd ed., Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
Corea, G.: 1985, The Hidden Malpractice, Colophon, New York, NY.
Coulter, H.: 1972, Homeopathic Medicine, American Foundation for Homeopathy, Washington, DC.
Ehrenreich, B. and English, D.: 1979, For Her Own Good, Anchor/Doubleday, New York, NY.
Ehrenreich, B. and English, D.: 1973, Witches, Midwives, and Nurses: A History of Women Healers, Feminist Press, Old Westbury, CT.
Gordon, J. and Fadiman, J.: 1984, Toward an Integral Medicine’, in J. Gordon, D. Jaffe and D. Bresler, (eds.), Mind, Body, and Health: Toward an Integral Medicine, Human Sciences Press, New York, NY.
Griffin, D. R.: 1988, The Reenchantment of Science, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
Hillman, J.: 1988,’ sex Talk: Imagining a New Male Sexuality’, talk at the Mendocino Men’s Conference, reprinted in Utne Reader, September/October 1988, 76.
Hunter, J. R. and Shearer, G.: 1987, Testimony before the Sub-committee on Health and Long-Term Care of the House Select Committee on Aging, 17 February and 27 January 1987, respectively’, The Congressional Digest 66 (4), 111, 123.
Inglis, B.: 1964, Fringe Medicine, Faber and Faber, London, U.K.
Kopelman, L., and Moskop, J.: 1981, ‘The Holistic Health Movement: A Survey and Critique’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6, 209–235.
Mattson, P: 1982, Holistic Health in Perspective, Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.
McKinlay, J. and McKinlay, S.: 1986, ‘Medical Measures and the Decline of Mortality’, in P. Conrad and R. Kern (eds.), The Sociology of Health and Illness, 2nd ed., St Martin’s, New York, NY, pp. 10–23.
McKnight, J.: 1986, ‘Politicizing Health Care’, in P. Conrad and R. Kern (eds.), The Sociology of Health and Illness, 2nd ed., St Martin’s, New York, NY, pp. 412–415.
McLamb, J. T. and Huntley, R. R.: 1967, ‘The Hazards of Hospitalization’, Southern Medical Journal 60, 469–472.
Mitchell, J. R. A.: 1979, ‘First We Debilitate, Then We Rehabilitate’, British Medical Journal, 3 November 1979, 1132–33.
Payer, L.: 1988, Medicine and Culture, Holt and Co., New York, NY.
Salmon, J. W.: 1984, Alternative Medicines: Popular and Policy Perspectives, Tavistock, New York, NY.
Sehnert, K.: 1980, ‘The Self-Care Concept’, in T. Ferguson (ed.), Medical Self-Care: Access to Health Tools, Summit, New York, NY.
Shapiro, M.: 1987, Getting Doctored, New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, PA.
Steel, K. et al.: 1981, ‘Iatrogenic Illness on a General Medical Service at a University Hospital’, New England Journal of Medicine 304, 638–642.
Zaner, R.: 1988, Ethics and the Clinical Encounter, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Zola, I. K.: 1986, ‘Medicine as an Institution of Social Control’, in P. Conrad and R. Kern (eds.), The Sociology of Health and Illness, 2nd ed., St. Martin’s, New York, NY, pp. 379–390.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weston, A. (1992). On the Body in Medical Self-Care and Holistic Medicine. In: Leder, D. (eds) The Body in Medical Thought and Practice. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7924-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7924-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4140-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7924-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive