Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLA,volume 13))

Abstract

To understand uncertainty we must take a closer look at its various sources. These leave more uncertainty than we normally recognize. Indeed, our knowledge is always far less certain than the statistical measures lead us to believe. The basis for this claim will be a review of the mutual relationship of the three concepts that are fundamental for all prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. (1951), Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. Ross (1972), “Systems and Their Informational Measures,” in George J. Klir, ed., Trends in General Systems Theory, New York: John Wiley and Sons, ch. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, P., Pomeau, Y. and Vidal, Ch. (1986), Order Within Chaos, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, James O. (1980), Statistical Decision Theory, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, James O. and Berry, Donald A. (1988), “StatisticalAnalysis and the Illusion of Objectivity,” American Scientist, MarchApril, 76, pp. 159–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, Ludwig von (1968), General System Theory, New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels (1949), “Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics,” in Wheeler and Zurek, Quantum Theory, pp. 9–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth E. (1972), “Economics and General Systems,”in Erwin Laszlo ed., The Relevance of General Systems Theory, International Library of Systems Theory and Philosophy; New York: George Braziller, ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espagnat, Bernard (1983), In Search of Reality, New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • French, A.P. and Kennedy, P.J., eds. (1985), Niels Bohr, a Centenary Volume, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, Robert (1981), Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, M. D. (1965), “Certain Problems in the Application of Mathematical Economics,” in Jerome Fox, ed., System Theory, New York: Polytechnic Press of the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, pp. 315–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Michael (1976), The Twilight of Capitalism, New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, Werner (1927), “The Physical Content of Quantum Kinematics and Mechanics,” in Wheeler and Zurek, Quantum Theory, pp. 62–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, Sir Harold (1973), Scientific Inference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3rd Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2nd Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan, eds. (1970), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1963), “New Methodsin Statistical Economics,” Journal of Political Economy, October, 71, pp. 421–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Richard von (1957), Probability, Statistics and Truth, New York: Dover, 2nd English Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, Dugald (1987), Niels Bohr ’s Philosophy of Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peitgen, Heinz-Otto, and Saupe, Deitmar, eds. (1988), The Science of Fractal Images, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, T. and Stewart, I. (1978), Catastrophe T h eory and its Applications, London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, Ilya et. al. (1977), “The Evolution of Complexity andthe Laws of Nature,” in E. Laszlo and J. Bierman, eds., Goalsina Global Community, Report to the Club of Rome, Vol. 1, pp. 5–63, New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, Ilya (1980), Physique Temps et Devenir, Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schewe, Phillip F. and Gollub, Jerry (1985), Chaos, a Glossary, American Institute of Physics Pub R-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, René (1983a), Paraboles et Catastrophes, Entretiens surles Mathematiques, la Science et la Philosophie, Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, René (1983b), Mathematical Models of Morphogenesis,Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood Ltd. (in USA: Halsted Press--Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredennick, H., ed. (1933), Aristotle: Volume XVII. Metaphysics, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, John B. (1930), Behaviorism, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J.A. and Zurek, W.H., eds. (1983), Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, Eugene P. (1961), “Remarks on the Mind-Body Question,” in Wheeler and Zurek, Quantum Theory, pp. 168–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965), “Fuzzy Sets and Systems”, in Jerome Fox, ed.,System Theory, New York: Polytechnic Press of the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, pp. 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeeman, E. Christopher (1977), Catastrophe Theory, Reading, MA: Addison--Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winkler, G.M.R. (1990). Necessity, Chance, and Freedom. In: Acting under Uncertainty: Multidisciplinary Conceptions. Theory and Decision Library, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7873-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7873-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5785-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7873-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics